If you Google for this phrase found in the Vim documentation you'll find
almost exclusively hits from the Vim documentation. I think changing
"halfway a line" to "halfway through a line" makes more sense.
There seems to be an pervasive odd use of the word 'halfway' in the
original docs which I'm updating everywhere.
Problem: Setting the local value of 'backupcopy' empty gives an error.
(Peter Mattern)
Solution: When using an empty value set the flags to zero. (Hirohito
Higashi)
https://code.google.com/p/vim/source/detail?r=v7-4-462
Problem: In some situations, when setting up an environment to trigger an
autocommand, the environment is not properly restored.
Solution: Check the return value of switch_win() and call restore_win()
always. (Daniel Hahler)
https://code.google.com/p/vim/source/detail?r=v7-4-446
Problem: In Insert mode, after inserting a newline that inserts a comment
leader, CTRL-O moves to the right. (ZyX) Issue 57.
Solution: Correct the condition for moving the cursor back to the NUL.
(Christian Brabandt)
https://code.google.com/p/vim/source/detail?r=v7-4-492
The primitive C canonicalizer we use to strip out duplicate header
declarations and keep luajit's ffi happy, didn't work properly in this case.
What happened is this (in /usr/include/ctype.h):
__DARWIN_CTYPE_TOP_inline int
isspecial(int _c)
{
return (__istype(_c, _CTYPE_T));
}
Gets preprocessed to something like:
__inline int
isspecial(int _c)
{
return (__istype(_c, _CTYPE_T));
}
On OSX/gcc. The formatter wasn't recognizing this entire function as
something to put on a single line because it naively just checks for
"static" or "inline" for that, but not "__inline".
This error doesn't occur on OSX/clang. Without looking further into it, I
guess that __DARWIN_CTYPE_TOP_inline gets defined to inline on clang, but
__inline on gcc, for some reason.
This helps issue #1572 along.
The second argument to lfs.attributes() serves only to select a specific
part of the normally returned table. It's not a file open flag (e.g.: as for
fopen() in C). Also made the (n)eq checks a bit more idiomatic.
Fixes#1831
Problem : Operands don't affect results (CONSTANT_EXPRESSION_RESULT).
Diagnostic : Harmless issue.
Rationale : n >= LONG_MIN, n being intmax_t, is always true for
architectures where sizeof(intmax_t) == sizeof(long).
Resolution : Add sizes check.
