NFS appears to use d_obtain_alias() to create the root dentry rather than
d_make_root. This can cause 'prepend_path()' to complain that the root
has a weird name if an NFS filesystem is lazily unmounted. e.g. if
"/mnt" is an NFS mount then
{ cd /mnt; umount -l /mnt ; ls -l /proc/self/cwd; }
will cause a WARN message like
WARNING: at /home/git/linux/fs/dcache.c:2624 prepend_path+0x1d7/0x1e0()
...
Root dentry has weird name <>
to appear in kernel logs.
So change d_obtain_alias() to use "/" rather than "" as the anonymous
name.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Commit 8e22cc88d6 removes the (un)lock_super
function definitions but forgets to remove their prototypes.
Signed-off-by: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Removed vmtruncate
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Anton Altaparmakov <anton@tuxera.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Mark as cancelled an operation that is in progress rather than pending at the
time it is cancelled, and call fscache_complete_op() to cancel an operation so
that blocked ops can be started.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In fscache_write_op(), if the object is determined to have become inactive or
to have lost its cookie, we don't move the operation state from in-progress,
and so an assertion in fscache_put_operation() fails with an assertion (see
below).
Instrumenting fscache_op_work_func() indicates that it called
fscache_write_op() before calling fscache_put_operation() - where the assertion
failed. The assertion at line 433 indicates that the operation state is
IN_PROGRESS rather than being COMPLETE or CANCELLED.
Instrumenting fscache_write_op() showed that it was being called on an object
that had had its cookie removed and that this was due to relinquishment of the
cookie by the netfs. At this point fscache no longer has access to the pages
of netfs data that were requested to be written, and so simply cancelling the
operation is the thing to do.
FS-Cache: Assertion failed
3 == 5 is false
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/fscache/operation.c:433!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
Modules linked in: cachefiles(F) nfsv4(F) nfsv3(F) nfsv2(F) nfs(F) fscache(F) auth_rpcgss(F) nfs_acl(F) lockd(F) sunrpc(F)
CPU 0
Pid: 1035, comm: kworker/u:3 Tainted: GF 3.7.0-rc8-fsdevel+ #411 /DG965RY
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa007db22>] [<ffffffffa007db22>] fscache_put_operation+0x11a/0x2ed [fscache]
RSP: 0018:ffff88003e32bcf8 EFLAGS: 00010296
RAX: 000000000000000f RBX: ffff88001818eb78 RCX: ffffffff6c102000
RDX: ffffffff8102d1ad RSI: ffffffff6c102000 RDI: ffffffff8102d1d6
RBP: ffff88003e32bd18 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffa00811da
R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000100625d26 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00007fff7dd31c68 CR3: 000000003d730000 CR4: 00000000000007f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process kworker/u:3 (pid: 1035, threadinfo ffff88003e32a000, task ffff88003bb38080)
Stack:
ffffffff8102d1ad ffff88001818eb78 ffffffffa00811da 0000000000000001
ffff88003e32bd48 ffffffffa007f0ad ffff88001818eb78 ffffffff819583c0
ffff88003df24e00 ffff88003882c3e0 ffff88003e32bde8 ffffffff81042de0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8102d1ad>] ? vprintk_emit+0x3c6/0x41a
[<ffffffffa00811da>] ? __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages+0x4bc/0x4bc [fscache]
[<ffffffffa007f0ad>] fscache_op_work_func+0xec/0x123 [fscache]
[<ffffffff81042de0>] process_one_work+0x21c/0x3b0
[<ffffffff81042d82>] ? process_one_work+0x1be/0x3b0
[<ffffffffa007efc1>] ? fscache_operation_gc+0x23e/0x23e [fscache]
[<ffffffff8104332e>] worker_thread+0x202/0x2df
[<ffffffff8104312c>] ? rescuer_thread+0x18e/0x18e
[<ffffffff81047c1c>] kthread+0xd0/0xd8
[<ffffffff81421bfa>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x3e
[<ffffffff81047b4c>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55
[<ffffffff814227ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[<ffffffff81047b4c>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Add a missing transition to the FS-Cache object state machine to handle an
invalidation event occuring between the back end completing the object lookup
by calling fscache_obtained_object() (which moves to state OBJECT_AVAILABLE)
and the backend returning to fscache_lookup_object() and thence to
fscache_object_state_machine() which then does a goto lookup_transit to handle
the transition - but lookup_transit doesn't handle EV_INVALIDATE.
Without this, the following BUG can be logged:
FS-Cache: Unsupported event 2 [5/f7] in state OBJECT_AVAILABLE
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/fscache/object.c:357!
Where event 2 is EV_INVALIDATE.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
nfs_migrate_page() does not wait for FS-Cache to finish with a page, probably
leading to the following bad-page-state:
BUG: Bad page state in process python-bin pfn:17d39b
page:ffffea00053649e8 flags:004000000000100c count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:(null)
index:38686 (Tainted: G B ---------------- )
Pid: 31053, comm: python-bin Tainted: G B ----------------
2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8111bfe7>] bad_page+0x107/0x160
[<ffffffff8111ee69>] free_hot_cold_page+0x1c9/0x220
[<ffffffff8111ef19>] __pagevec_free+0x59/0xb0
[<ffffffff8104b988>] ? flush_tlb_others_ipi+0x128/0x130
[<ffffffff8112230c>] release_pages+0x21c/0x250
[<ffffffff8115b92a>] ? remove_migration_pte+0x28a/0x2b0
[<ffffffff8115f3f8>] ? mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page+0x18/0x70
[<ffffffff81122687>] ____pagevec_lru_add+0x167/0x180
[<ffffffff811226f8>] __lru_cache_add+0x58/0x70
[<ffffffff81122731>] lru_cache_add_lru+0x21/0x40
[<ffffffff81123f49>] putback_lru_page+0x69/0x100
[<ffffffff8115c0bd>] migrate_pages+0x13d/0x5d0
[<ffffffff81122687>] ? ____pagevec_lru_add+0x167/0x180
[<ffffffff81152ab0>] ? compaction_alloc+0x0/0x370
[<ffffffff8115255c>] compact_zone+0x4cc/0x600
[<ffffffff8111cfac>] ? get_page_from_freelist+0x15c/0x820
[<ffffffff810672f4>] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x1c4/0x3c0
[<ffffffff8115290e>] compact_zone_order+0x7e/0xb0
[<ffffffff81152a49>] try_to_compact_pages+0x109/0x170
[<ffffffff8111e94d>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5ed/0x850
[<ffffffff814c9136>] ? thread_return+0x4e/0x778
[<ffffffff81150d43>] alloc_pages_vma+0x93/0x150
[<ffffffff81167ea5>] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x135/0x340
[<ffffffff814cb6f6>] ? rwsem_down_read_failed+0x26/0x30
[<ffffffff81136755>] handle_mm_fault+0x245/0x2b0
[<ffffffff814ce383>] do_page_fault+0x123/0x3a0
[<ffffffff814cbdf5>] page_fault+0x25/0x30
nfs_migrate_page() calls nfs_fscache_release_page() which doesn't actually wait
- even if __GFP_WAIT is set. The reason that doesn't wait is that
fscache_maybe_release_page() might deadlock the allocator as the work threads
writing to the cache may all end up sleeping on memory allocation.
However, I wonder if that is actually a problem. There are a number of things
I can do to deal with this:
(1) Make nfs_migrate_page() wait.
(2) Make fscache_maybe_release_page() honour the __GFP_WAIT flag.
(3) Set a timeout around the wait.
(4) Make nfs_migrate_page() return an error if the page is still busy.
For the moment, I'll select (2) and (4).
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
The function to submit an exclusive op (fscache_submit_exclusive_op()) can BUG
if there's been an I/O error because it may see the parent cache object in an
unexpected state. It should only BUG if there hasn't been an I/O error.
In this case the problem was produced by remounting the cache partition to be
R/O. The EROFS state was detected and the cache was aborted, but not
everything handled the aborting correctly.
SysRq : Emergency Remount R/O
EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
Emergency Remount complete
CacheFiles: I/O Error: Failed to update xattr with error -30
FS-Cache: Cache cachefiles stopped due to I/O error
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/fscache/operation.c:128!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU 0
Modules linked in: cachefiles nfs fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd sunrpc
Pid: 6612, comm: kworker/u:2 Not tainted 3.1.0-rc8-fsdevel+ #1093 /DG965RY
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00739c0>] [<ffffffffa00739c0>] fscache_submit_exclusive_op+0x2ad/0x2c2 [fscache]
RSP: 0018:ffff880000853d40 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: ffff880038ac72a8 RBX: ffff8800181f2260 RCX: ffffffff81f2b2b0
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff8179a478 RDI: ffff8800181f2280
RBP: ffff880000853d60 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff880038ac7268
R13: ffff8800181f2280 R14: ffff88003a359190 R15: 000000010122b162
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00000034cc4a77f0 CR3: 0000000010e96000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process kworker/u:2 (pid: 6612, threadinfo ffff880000852000, task ffff880014c3c040)
Stack:
ffff8800181f2260 ffff8800181f2310 ffff880038ac7268 ffff8800181f2260
ffff880000853dc0 ffffffffa0072375 ffff880037ecfe00 ffff88003a359198
ffff880000853dc0 0000000000000246 0000000000000000 ffff88000a91d308
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa0072375>] fscache_object_work_func+0x792/0xe65 [fscache]
[<ffffffff81047e44>] process_one_work+0x1eb/0x37f
[<ffffffff81047de6>] ? process_one_work+0x18d/0x37f
[<ffffffffa0071be3>] ? fscache_enqueue_dependents+0xd8/0xd8 [fscache]
[<ffffffff810482e4>] worker_thread+0x15a/0x21a
[<ffffffff8104818a>] ? rescuer_thread+0x188/0x188
[<ffffffff8104bf96>] kthread+0x7f/0x87
[<ffffffff813ad6f4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff81026b98>] ? finish_task_switch+0x45/0xc0
[<ffffffff813abd1d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[<ffffffff8104bf17>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x53/0x53
[<ffffffff813ad6f0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Limit the number of I/O error reports for a cache to 1 to prevent massive
amounts of noise. After the first I/O error the cache is taken off line
automatically, so must be restarted to resume caching.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Don't mask off the object event mask when printing it. That way it can be seen
if threre are bits set that shouldn't be.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Initialise the object event mask with the calculated mask rather than unmasking
undefined events also.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Convert the fscache_object event IDs from #defines into an enum. Also add an
extra label to the enum to carry the event count and redefine the event mask
in terms of that.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Use the new FS-Cache invalidation facility from NFS to deal with foreign
changes being detected on the server rather than attempting to retire the old
cookie and get a new one.
The problem with the old method was that NFS did not wait for all outstanding
storage and retrieval ops on the cache to complete. There was no automatic
wait between the calls to ->readpages() and calls to invalidate_inode_pages2()
as the latter can only wait on locked pages that have been added to the
pagecache (which they haven't yet on entry to ->readpages()).
This was leading to oopses like the one below when an outstanding read got cut
off from its cookie by a premature release.
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000000a8
IP: [<ffffffffa0075118>] __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages+0x1dd/0x315 [fscache]
PGD 15889067 PUD 15890067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU 0
Modules linked in: cachefiles nfs fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd sunrpc
Pid: 4544, comm: tar Not tainted 3.1.0-rc4-fsdevel+ #1064 /DG965RY
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa0075118>] [<ffffffffa0075118>] __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages+0x1dd/0x315 [fscache]
RSP: 0018:ffff8800158799e8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8800070d41e0 RCX: ffff8800083dc1b0
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff880015879960 RDI: ffff88003e627b90
RBP: ffff880015879a28 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000002
R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffff880015879950 R12: ffff880015879aa4
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8800083dc158 R15: ffff880015879be8
FS: 00007f671e9d87c0(0000) GS:ffff88003bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00000000000000a8 CR3: 000000001587f000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process tar (pid: 4544, threadinfo ffff880015878000, task ffff880015875040)
Stack:
ffffffffa00b1759 ffff8800070dc158 ffff8800000213da ffff88002a286508
ffff880015879aa4 ffff880015879be8 0000000000000001 ffff88002a2866e8
ffff880015879a88 ffffffffa00b20be 00000000000200da ffff880015875040
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa00b1759>] ? nfs_fscache_wait_bit+0xd/0xd [nfs]
[<ffffffffa00b20be>] __nfs_readpages_from_fscache+0x7e/0x13f [nfs]
[<ffffffff81095fe7>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x156/0x662
[<ffffffffa0098763>] nfs_readpages+0xee/0x187 [nfs]
[<ffffffff81098a5e>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x1be/0x267
[<ffffffff81098942>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0xa2/0x267
[<ffffffff81098d7b>] ra_submit+0x1c/0x20
[<ffffffff8109900a>] ondemand_readahead+0x28b/0x29a
[<ffffffff810990ce>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x38/0x3a
[<ffffffff81091d8a>] generic_file_aio_read+0x2ab/0x67e
[<ffffffffa008cfbe>] nfs_file_read+0xa4/0xc9 [nfs]
[<ffffffff810c22c4>] do_sync_read+0xba/0xfa
[<ffffffff810a62c9>] ? might_fault+0x4e/0x9e
[<ffffffff81177a47>] ? security_file_permission+0x7b/0x84
[<ffffffff810c25dd>] ? rw_verify_area+0xab/0xc8
[<ffffffff810c29a4>] vfs_read+0xaa/0x13a
[<ffffffff810c2a79>] sys_read+0x45/0x6c
[<ffffffff813ac37b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Reported-by: Mark Moseley <moseleymark@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Implement invalidation for CacheFiles. This is in two parts:
(1) Provide an invalidation method (which just truncates the backing file).
(2) Abort attempts to copy anything read from the backing file whilst
invalidation is in progress.
Question: CacheFiles uses truncation in a couple of places. It has been using
notify_change() rather than sys_truncate() or something similar. This means
it bypasses a bunch of checks and suchlike that it possibly should be making
(security, file locking, lease breaking, vfsmount write). Should it be using
vfs_truncate() as added by a preceding patch or should it use notify_write()
and assume that anyone poking around in the cache files on disk gets
everything they deserve?
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Make a more complete truncate operation available to CacheFiles (including
security checks and suchlike) so that it can use this to clear invalidated
cache files.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Provide a proper invalidation method rather than relying on the netfs retiring
the cookie it has and getting a new one. The problem with this is that isn't
easy for the netfs to make sure that it has completed/cancelled all its
outstanding storage and retrieval operations on the cookie it is retiring.
Instead, have the cache provide an invalidation method that will cancel or wait
for all currently outstanding operations before invalidating the cache, and
will cause new operations to queue up behind that. Whilst invalidation is in
progress, some requests will be rejected until the cache can stack a barrier on
the operation queue to cause new operations to be deferred behind it.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Fix the state management of internal fscache operations and the accounting of
what operations are in what states.
This is done by:
(1) Give struct fscache_operation a enum variable that directly represents the
state it's currently in, rather than spreading this knowledge over a bunch
of flags, who's processing the operation at the moment and whether it is
queued or not.
This makes it easier to write assertions to check the state at various
points and to prevent invalid state transitions.
(2) Add an 'operation complete' state and supply a function to indicate the
completion of an operation (fscache_op_complete()) and make things call
it. The final call to fscache_put_operation() can then check that an op
in the appropriate state (complete or cancelled).
(3) Adjust the use of object->n_ops, ->n_in_progress, ->n_exclusive to better
govern the state of an object:
(a) The ->n_ops is now the number of extant operations on the object
and is now decremented by fscache_put_operation() only.
(b) The ->n_in_progress is simply the number of objects that have been
taken off of the object's pending queue for the purposes of being
run. This is decremented by fscache_op_complete() only.
(c) The ->n_exclusive is the number of exclusive ops that have been
submitted and queued or are in progress. It is decremented by
fscache_op_complete() and by fscache_cancel_op().
fscache_put_operation() and fscache_operation_gc() now no longer try to
clean up ->n_exclusive and ->n_in_progress. That was leading to double
decrements against fscache_cancel_op().
fscache_cancel_op() now no longer decrements ->n_ops. That was leading to
double decrements against fscache_put_operation().
fscache_submit_exclusive_op() now decides whether it has to queue an op
based on ->n_in_progress being > 0 rather than ->n_ops > 0 as the latter
will persist in being true even after all preceding operations have been
cancelled or completed. Furthermore, if an object is active and there are
runnable ops against it, there must be at least one op running.
(4) Add a remaining-pages counter (n_pages) to struct fscache_retrieval and
provide a function to record completion of the pages as they complete.
When n_pages reaches 0, the operation is deemed to be complete and
fscache_op_complete() is called.
Add calls to fscache_retrieval_complete() anywhere we've finished with a
page we've been given to read or allocate for. This includes places where
we just return pages to the netfs for reading from the server and where
accessing the cache fails and we discard the proposed netfs page.
The bugs in the unfixed state management manifest themselves as oopses like the
following where the operation completion gets out of sync with return of the
cookie by the netfs. This is possible because the cache unlocks and returns
all the netfs pages before recording its completion - which means that there's
nothing to stop the netfs discarding them and returning the cookie.
FS-Cache: Cookie 'NFS.fh' still has outstanding reads
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/fscache/cookie.c:519!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU 1
Modules linked in: cachefiles nfs fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd sunrpc
Pid: 400, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.1.0-rc7-fsdevel+ #1090 /DG965RY
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa007050a>] [<ffffffffa007050a>] __fscache_relinquish_cookie+0x170/0x343 [fscache]
RSP: 0018:ffff8800368cfb00 EFLAGS: 00010282
RAX: 000000000000003c RBX: ffff880023cc8790 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000002f2e RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff813ab86c
RBP: ffff8800368cfb50 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff88003a1b7890 R11: ffff88001df6e488 R12: ffff880023d8ed98
R13: ffff880023cc8798 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: ffff88003b8bf370
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00000000008ba008 CR3: 0000000023d93000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process kswapd0 (pid: 400, threadinfo ffff8800368ce000, task ffff88003b8bf040)
Stack:
ffff88003b8bf040 ffff88001df6e528 ffff88001df6e528 ffffffffa00b46b0
ffff88003b8bf040 ffff88001df6e488 ffff88001df6e620 ffffffffa00b46b0
ffff88001ebd04c8 0000000000000004 ffff8800368cfb70 ffffffffa00b2c91
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa00b2c91>] nfs_fscache_release_inode_cookie+0x3b/0x47 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa008f25f>] nfs_clear_inode+0x3c/0x41 [nfs]
[<ffffffffa0090df1>] nfs4_evict_inode+0x2f/0x33 [nfs]
[<ffffffff810d8d47>] evict+0xa1/0x15c
[<ffffffff810d8e2e>] dispose_list+0x2c/0x38
[<ffffffff810d9ebd>] prune_icache_sb+0x28c/0x29b
[<ffffffff810c56b7>] prune_super+0xd5/0x140
[<ffffffff8109b615>] shrink_slab+0x102/0x1ab
[<ffffffff8109d690>] balance_pgdat+0x2f2/0x595
[<ffffffff8103e009>] ? process_timeout+0xb/0xb
[<ffffffff8109dba3>] kswapd+0x270/0x289
[<ffffffff8104c5ea>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x46/0x46
[<ffffffff8109d933>] ? balance_pgdat+0x595/0x595
[<ffffffff8104bf7a>] kthread+0x7f/0x87
[<ffffffff813ad6b4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff81026b98>] ? finish_task_switch+0x45/0xc0
[<ffffffff813abcdd>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[<ffffffff8104befb>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x53/0x53
[<ffffffff813ad6b0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Make fscache_relinquish_cookie() log a warning and wait if there are any
outstanding reads left on the cookie it was given.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Downgrade some debugging statements to not unconditionally print stuff, but
rather be conditional on the appropriate module parameter setting.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Check that the netfs isn't trying to relinquish a cookie that still has read
operations in progress upon it. If there are, then give log a warning and BUG.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Downgrade the requirements passed to the allocator in the gfp flags parameter.
FS-Cache/CacheFiles can handle OOM conditions simply by aborting the attempt to
store an object or a page in the cache.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Under some circumstances CacheFiles defers the marking of pages with PG_fscache
so that it can take advantage of pagevecs to reduce the number of calls to
fscache_mark_pages_cached() and the netfs's hook to keep track of this.
There are, however, two problems with this:
(1) It can lead to the PG_fscache mark being applied _after_ the page is set
PG_uptodate and unlocked (by the call to fscache_end_io()).
(2) CacheFiles's ref on the page is dropped immediately following
fscache_end_io() - and so may not still be held when the mark is applied.
This can lead to the page being passed back to the allocator before the
mark is applied.
Fix this by, where appropriate, marking the page before calling
fscache_end_io() and releasing the page. This means that we can't take
advantage of pagevecs and have to make a separate call for each page to the
marking routines.
The symptoms of this are Bad Page state errors cropping up under memory
pressure, for example:
BUG: Bad page state in process tar pfn:002da
page:ffffea0000009fb0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x1447
page flags: 0x1000(private_2)
Pid: 4574, comm: tar Tainted: G W 3.1.0-rc4-fsdevel+ #1064
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8109583c>] ? dump_page+0xb9/0xbe
[<ffffffff81095916>] bad_page+0xd5/0xea
[<ffffffff81095d82>] get_page_from_freelist+0x35b/0x46a
[<ffffffff810961f3>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x362/0x662
[<ffffffff810989da>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x13a/0x267
[<ffffffff81098942>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0xa2/0x267
[<ffffffff81098d7b>] ra_submit+0x1c/0x20
[<ffffffff8109900a>] ondemand_readahead+0x28b/0x29a
[<ffffffff81098ee2>] ? ondemand_readahead+0x163/0x29a
[<ffffffff810990ce>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x38/0x3a
[<ffffffff81091d8a>] generic_file_aio_read+0x2ab/0x67e
[<ffffffffa008cfbe>] nfs_file_read+0xa4/0xc9 [nfs]
[<ffffffff810c22c4>] do_sync_read+0xba/0xfa
[<ffffffff81177a47>] ? security_file_permission+0x7b/0x84
[<ffffffff810c25dd>] ? rw_verify_area+0xab/0xc8
[<ffffffff810c29a4>] vfs_read+0xaa/0x13a
[<ffffffff810c2a79>] sys_read+0x45/0x6c
[<ffffffff813ac37b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
As can be seen, PG_private_2 (== PG_fscache) is set in the page flags.
Instrumenting fscache_mark_pages_cached() to verify whether page->mapping was
set appropriately showed that sometimes it wasn't. This led to the discovery
that sometimes the page has apparently been reclaimed by the time the marker
got to see it.
Reported-by: M. Stevens <m@tippett.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Removed vmtruncate
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Removed vmtruncate
Signed-off-by: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
File descriptors (even those for writing) do not hold freeze protection.
Thus mark_files_ro() must call __mnt_drop_write() to only drop protection
against remount read-only. Calling mnt_drop_write_file() as we do now
results in:
[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
3.7.0-rc6-00028-g88e75b6 #101 Not tainted
-------------------------------------
kworker/1:2/79 is trying to release lock (sb_writers) at:
[<ffffffff811b33b4>] mnt_drop_write+0x24/0x30
but there are no more locks to release!
Reported-by: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
The code that relied on that flag was ripped out of btrfs quite some
time ago, and never added back. Josef indicated that he was going to
take a different approach to the problem in btrfs, and that we
could just eliminate this flag.
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
