neovim/test/functional/options/shortmess_spec.lua
bfredl e61228a214 fix(tests): needing two calls to setup a screen is cringe
Before calling "attach" a screen object is just a dummy container for
(row, col) values whose purpose is to be sent as part of the "attach"
function call anyway.

Just create the screen in an attached state directly. Keep the complete
(row, col, options) config together. It is still completely valid to
later detach and re-attach as needed, including to another session.
2024-11-14 12:40:57 +01:00

84 lines
2.5 KiB
Lua

local t = require('test.testutil')
local n = require('test.functional.testnvim')()
local Screen = require('test.functional.ui.screen')
local clear = n.clear
local command = n.command
local eq = t.eq
local eval = n.eval
local feed = n.feed
describe("'shortmess'", function()
local screen
before_each(function()
clear()
screen = Screen.new(42, 5)
end)
describe('"F" flag', function()
it('hides :edit fileinfo messages', function()
command('set hidden')
command('set shortmess-=F')
feed(':edit foo<CR>')
screen:expect([[
^ |
{1:~ }|*3
"foo" [New] |
]])
eq(1, eval('bufnr("%")'))
command('set shortmess+=F')
feed(':edit bar<CR>')
screen:expect([[
^ |
{1:~ }|*3
:edit bar |
]])
eq(2, eval('bufnr("%")'))
end)
it('hides :bnext, :bprevious fileinfo messages', function()
command('set hidden')
command('set shortmess-=F')
feed(':edit foo<CR>')
screen:expect([[
^ |
{1:~ }|*3
"foo" [New] |
]])
eq(1, eval('bufnr("%")'))
feed(':edit bar<CR>')
screen:expect([[
^ |
{1:~ }|*3
"bar" [New] |
]])
eq(2, eval('bufnr("%")'))
feed(':bprevious<CR>')
screen:expect([[
^ |
{1:~ }|*3
"foo" [New] --No lines in buffer-- |
]])
eq(1, eval('bufnr("%")'))
command('set shortmess+=F')
feed(':bnext<CR>')
screen:expect([[
^ |
{1:~ }|*3
:bnext |
]])
eq(2, eval('bufnr("%")'))
feed(':bprevious<CR>')
screen:expect([[
^ |
{1:~ }|*3
:bprevious |
]])
eq(1, eval('bufnr("%")'))
end)
end)
end)