mirror of
https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
synced 2024-12-26 06:05:06 -07:00
78223bc97f
Update runtime files.
b4d6c3ea4a
720 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
720 lines
28 KiB
Plaintext
*usr_44.txt* Nvim
|
|
|
|
VIM USER MANUAL - by Bram Moolenaar
|
|
|
|
Your own syntax highlighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vim comes with highlighting for a couple of hundred different file types. If
|
|
the file you are editing isn't included, read this chapter to find out how to
|
|
get this type of file highlighted. Also see |:syn-define| in the reference
|
|
manual.
|
|
|
|
|44.1| Basic syntax commands
|
|
|44.2| Keywords
|
|
|44.3| Matches
|
|
|44.4| Regions
|
|
|44.5| Nested items
|
|
|44.6| Following groups
|
|
|44.7| Other arguments
|
|
|44.8| Clusters
|
|
|44.9| Including another syntax file
|
|
|44.10| Synchronizing
|
|
|44.11| Installing a syntax file
|
|
|44.12| Portable syntax file layout
|
|
|
|
Next chapter: |usr_45.txt| Select your language
|
|
Previous chapter: |usr_43.txt| Using filetypes
|
|
Table of contents: |usr_toc.txt|
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.1* Basic syntax commands
|
|
|
|
Using an existing syntax file to start with will save you a lot of time. Try
|
|
finding a syntax file in $VIMRUNTIME/syntax for a language that is similar.
|
|
These files will also show you the normal layout of a syntax file. To
|
|
understand it, you need to read the following.
|
|
|
|
Let's start with the basic arguments. Before we start defining any new
|
|
syntax, we need to clear out any old definitions: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax clear
|
|
|
|
This isn't required in the final syntax file, but very useful when
|
|
experimenting.
|
|
|
|
There are more simplifications in this chapter. If you are writing a syntax
|
|
file to be used by others, read all the way through the end to find out the
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LISTING DEFINED ITEMS
|
|
|
|
To check which syntax items are currently defined, use this command: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax
|
|
|
|
You can use this to check which items have actually been defined. Quite
|
|
useful when you are experimenting with a new syntax file. It also shows the
|
|
colors used for each item, which helps to find out what is what.
|
|
To list the items in a specific syntax group use: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax list {group-name}
|
|
|
|
This also can be used to list clusters (explained in |44.8|). Just include
|
|
the @ in the name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MATCHING CASE
|
|
|
|
Some languages are not case sensitive, such as Pascal. Others, such as C, are
|
|
case sensitive. You need to tell which type you have with the following
|
|
commands: >
|
|
:syntax case match
|
|
:syntax case ignore
|
|
|
|
The "match" argument means that Vim will match the case of syntax elements.
|
|
Therefore, "int" differs from "Int" and "INT". If the "ignore" argument is
|
|
used, the following are equivalent: "Procedure", "PROCEDURE" and "procedure".
|
|
The ":syntax case" commands can appear anywhere in a syntax file and affect
|
|
the syntax definitions that follow. In most cases, you have only one ":syntax
|
|
case" command in your syntax file; if you work with an unusual language that
|
|
contains both case-sensitive and non-case-sensitive elements, however, you can
|
|
scatter the ":syntax case" command throughout the file.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.2* Keywords
|
|
|
|
The most basic syntax elements are keywords. To define a keyword, use the
|
|
following form: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax keyword {group} {keyword} ...
|
|
|
|
The {group} is the name of a syntax group. With the ":highlight" command you
|
|
can assign colors to a {group}. The {keyword} argument is an actual keyword.
|
|
Here are a few examples: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax keyword xType int long char
|
|
:syntax keyword xStatement if then else endif
|
|
|
|
This example uses the group names "xType" and "xStatement". By convention,
|
|
each group name is prefixed by the filetype for the language being defined.
|
|
This example defines syntax for the x language (eXample language without an
|
|
interesting name). In a syntax file for "csh" scripts the name "cshType"
|
|
would be used. Thus the prefix is equal to the value of 'filetype'.
|
|
These commands cause the words "int", "long" and "char" to be highlighted
|
|
one way and the words "if", "then", "else" and "endif" to be highlighted
|
|
another way. Now you need to connect the x group names to standard Vim
|
|
names. You do this with the following commands: >
|
|
|
|
:highlight link xType Type
|
|
:highlight link xStatement Statement
|
|
|
|
This tells Vim to highlight "xType" like "Type" and "xStatement" like
|
|
"Statement". See |group-name| for the standard names.
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNUSUAL KEYWORDS
|
|
|
|
The characters used in a keyword must be in the 'iskeyword' option. If you
|
|
use another character, the word will never match. Vim doesn't give a warning
|
|
message for this.
|
|
The x language uses the '-' character in keywords. This is how it's done:
|
|
>
|
|
:setlocal iskeyword+=-
|
|
:syntax keyword xStatement when-not
|
|
|
|
The ":setlocal" command is used to change 'iskeyword' only for the current
|
|
buffer. Still it does change the behavior of commands like "w" and "*". If
|
|
that is not wanted, don't define a keyword but use a match (explained in the
|
|
next section).
|
|
|
|
The x language allows for abbreviations. For example, "next" can be
|
|
abbreviated to "n", "ne" or "nex". You can define them by using this command:
|
|
>
|
|
:syntax keyword xStatement n[ext]
|
|
|
|
This doesn't match "nextone", keywords always match whole words only.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.3* Matches
|
|
|
|
Consider defining something a bit more complex. You want to match ordinary
|
|
identifiers. To do this, you define a match syntax item. This one matches
|
|
any word consisting of only lowercase letters: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax match xIdentifier /\<\l\+\>/
|
|
<
|
|
Note:
|
|
Keywords overrule any other syntax item. Thus the keywords "if",
|
|
"then", etc., will be keywords, as defined with the ":syntax keyword"
|
|
commands above, even though they also match the pattern for
|
|
xIdentifier.
|
|
|
|
The part at the end is a pattern, like it's used for searching. The // is
|
|
used to surround the pattern (like how it's done in a ":substitute" command).
|
|
You can use any other character, like a plus or a quote.
|
|
|
|
Now define a match for a comment. In the x language it is anything from # to
|
|
the end of a line: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax match xComment /#.*/
|
|
|
|
Since you can use any search pattern, you can highlight very complex things
|
|
with a match item. See |pattern| for help on search patterns.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.4* Regions
|
|
|
|
In the example x language, strings are enclosed in double quotation marks (").
|
|
To highlight strings you define a region. You need a region start (double
|
|
quote) and a region end (double quote). The definition is as follows: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xString start=/"/ end=/"/
|
|
|
|
The "start" and "end" directives define the patterns used to find the start
|
|
and end of the region. But what about strings that look like this?
|
|
|
|
"A string with a double quote (\") in it" ~
|
|
|
|
This creates a problem: The double quotation marks in the middle of the string
|
|
will end the region. You need to tell Vim to skip over any escaped double
|
|
quotes in the string. Do this with the skip keyword: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xString start=/"/ skip=/\\"/ end=/"/
|
|
|
|
The double backslash matches a single backslash, since the backslash is a
|
|
special character in search patterns.
|
|
|
|
When to use a region instead of a match? The main difference is that a match
|
|
item is a single pattern, which must match as a whole. A region starts as
|
|
soon as the "start" pattern matches. Whether the "end" pattern is found or
|
|
not doesn't matter. Thus when the item depends on the "end" pattern to match,
|
|
you cannot use a region. Otherwise, regions are often simpler to define. And
|
|
it is easier to use nested items, as is explained in the next section.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.5* Nested items
|
|
|
|
Take a look at this comment:
|
|
|
|
%Get input TODO: Skip white space ~
|
|
|
|
You want to highlight TODO in big yellow letters, even though it is in a
|
|
comment that is highlighted blue. To let Vim know about this, you define the
|
|
following syntax groups: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax keyword xTodo TODO contained
|
|
:syntax match xComment /%.*/ contains=xTodo
|
|
|
|
In the first line, the "contained" argument tells Vim that this keyword can
|
|
exist only inside another syntax item. The next line has "contains=xTodo".
|
|
This indicates that the xTodo syntax element is inside it. The result is that
|
|
the comment line as a whole is matched with "xComment" and made blue. The
|
|
word TODO inside it is matched by xTodo and highlighted yellow (highlighting
|
|
for xTodo was setup for this).
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECURSIVE NESTING
|
|
|
|
The x language defines code blocks in curly braces. And a code block may
|
|
contain other code blocks. This can be defined this way: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xBlock start=/{/ end=/}/ contains=xBlock
|
|
|
|
Suppose you have this text:
|
|
|
|
while i < b { ~
|
|
if a { ~
|
|
b = c; ~
|
|
} ~
|
|
} ~
|
|
|
|
First a xBlock starts at the { in the first line. In the second line another
|
|
{ is found. Since we are inside a xBlock item, and it contains itself, a
|
|
nested xBlock item will start here. Thus the "b = c" line is inside the
|
|
second level xBlock region. Then a } is found in the next line, which matches
|
|
with the end pattern of the region. This ends the nested xBlock. Because the
|
|
} is included in the nested region, it is hidden from the first xBlock region.
|
|
Then at the last } the first xBlock region ends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEEPING THE END
|
|
|
|
Consider the following two syntax items: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xComment start=/%/ end=/$/ contained
|
|
:syntax region xPreProc start=/#/ end=/$/ contains=xComment
|
|
|
|
You define a comment as anything from % to the end of the line. A
|
|
preprocessor directive is anything from # to the end of the line. Because you
|
|
can have a comment on a preprocessor line, the preprocessor definition
|
|
includes a "contains=xComment" argument. Now look what happens with this
|
|
text:
|
|
|
|
#define X = Y % Comment text ~
|
|
int foo = 1; ~
|
|
|
|
What you see is that the second line is also highlighted as xPreProc. The
|
|
preprocessor directive should end at the end of the line. That is why
|
|
you have used "end=/$/". So what is going wrong?
|
|
The problem is the contained comment. The comment starts with % and ends
|
|
at the end of the line. After the comment ends, the preprocessor syntax
|
|
continues. This is after the end of the line has been seen, so the next
|
|
line is included as well.
|
|
To avoid this problem and to avoid a contained syntax item eating a needed
|
|
end of line, use the "keepend" argument. This takes care of
|
|
the double end-of-line matching: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xComment start=/%/ end=/$/ contained
|
|
:syntax region xPreProc start=/#/ end=/$/ contains=xComment keepend
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTAINING MANY ITEMS
|
|
|
|
You can use the contains argument to specify that everything can be contained.
|
|
For example: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xList start=/\[/ end=/\]/ contains=ALL
|
|
|
|
All syntax items will be contained in this one. It also contains itself, but
|
|
not at the same position (that would cause an endless loop).
|
|
You can specify that some groups are not contained. Thus contain all
|
|
groups but the ones that are listed:
|
|
>
|
|
:syntax region xList start=/\[/ end=/\]/ contains=ALLBUT,xString
|
|
|
|
With the "TOP" item you can include all items that don't have a "contained"
|
|
argument. "CONTAINED" is used to only include items with a "contained"
|
|
argument. See |:syn-contains| for the details.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.6* Following groups
|
|
|
|
The x language has statements in this form:
|
|
|
|
if (condition) then ~
|
|
|
|
You want to highlight the three items differently. But "(condition)" and
|
|
"then" might also appear in other places, where they get different
|
|
highlighting. This is how you can do this: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax match xIf /if/ nextgroup=xIfCondition skipwhite
|
|
:syntax match xIfCondition /([^)]*)/ contained nextgroup=xThen skipwhite
|
|
:syntax match xThen /then/ contained
|
|
|
|
The "nextgroup" argument specifies which item can come next. This is not
|
|
required. If none of the items that are specified are found, nothing happens.
|
|
For example, in this text:
|
|
|
|
if not (condition) then ~
|
|
|
|
The "if" is matched by xIf. "not" doesn't match the specified nextgroup
|
|
xIfCondition, thus only the "if" is highlighted.
|
|
|
|
The "skipwhite" argument tells Vim that white space (spaces and tabs) may
|
|
appear in between the items. Similar arguments are "skipnl", which allows a
|
|
line break in between the items, and "skipempty", which allows empty lines.
|
|
Notice that "skipnl" doesn't skip an empty line, something must match after
|
|
the line break.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.7* Other arguments
|
|
|
|
MATCHGROUP
|
|
|
|
When you define a region, the entire region is highlighted according to the
|
|
group name specified. To highlight the text enclosed in parentheses () with
|
|
the group xInside, for example, use the following command: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xInside start=/(/ end=/)/
|
|
|
|
Suppose, that you want to highlight the parentheses differently. You can do
|
|
this with a lot of convoluted region statements, or you can use the
|
|
"matchgroup" argument. This tells Vim to highlight the start and end of a
|
|
region with a different highlight group (in this case, the xParen group): >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xInside matchgroup=xParen start=/(/ end=/)/
|
|
|
|
The "matchgroup" argument applies to the start or end match that comes after
|
|
it. In the previous example both start and end are highlighted with xParen.
|
|
To highlight the end with xParenEnd: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xInside matchgroup=xParen start=/(/
|
|
\ matchgroup=xParenEnd end=/)/
|
|
|
|
A side effect of using "matchgroup" is that contained items will not match in
|
|
the start or end of the region. The example for "transparent" uses this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSPARENT
|
|
|
|
In a C language file you would like to highlight the () text after a "while"
|
|
differently from the () text after a "for". In both of these there can be
|
|
nested () items, which should be highlighted in the same way. You must make
|
|
sure the () highlighting stops at the matching ). This is one way to do this:
|
|
>
|
|
:syntax region cWhile matchgroup=cWhile start=/while\s*(/ end=/)/
|
|
\ contains=cCondNest
|
|
:syntax region cFor matchgroup=cFor start=/for\s*(/ end=/)/
|
|
\ contains=cCondNest
|
|
:syntax region cCondNest start=/(/ end=/)/ contained transparent
|
|
|
|
Now you can give cWhile and cFor different highlighting. The cCondNest item
|
|
can appear in either of them, but take over the highlighting of the item it is
|
|
contained in. The "transparent" argument causes this.
|
|
Notice that the "matchgroup" argument has the same group as the item
|
|
itself. Why define it then? Well, the side effect of using a matchgroup is
|
|
that contained items are not found in the match with the start item then.
|
|
This avoids that the cCondNest group matches the ( just after the "while" or
|
|
"for". If this would happen, it would span the whole text until the matching
|
|
) and the region would continue after it. Now cCondNest only matches after
|
|
the match with the start pattern, thus after the first (.
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFFSETS
|
|
|
|
Suppose you want to define a region for the text between ( and ) after an
|
|
"if". But you don't want to include the "if" or the ( and ). You can do this
|
|
by specifying offsets for the patterns. Example: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xCond start=/if\s*(/ms=e+1 end=/)/me=s-1
|
|
|
|
The offset for the start pattern is "ms=e+1". "ms" stands for Match Start.
|
|
This defines an offset for the start of the match. Normally the match starts
|
|
where the pattern matches. "e+1" means that the match now starts at the end
|
|
of the pattern match, and then one character further.
|
|
The offset for the end pattern is "me=s-1". "me" stands for Match End.
|
|
"s-1" means the start of the pattern match and then one character back. The
|
|
result is that in this text:
|
|
|
|
if (foo == bar) ~
|
|
|
|
Only the text "foo == bar" will be highlighted as xCond.
|
|
|
|
More about offsets here: |:syn-pattern-offset|.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ONELINE
|
|
|
|
The "oneline" argument indicates that the region does not cross a line
|
|
boundary. For example: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xIfThen start=/if/ end=/then/ oneline
|
|
|
|
This defines a region that starts at "if" and ends at "then". But if there is
|
|
no "then" after the "if", the region doesn't match.
|
|
|
|
Note:
|
|
When using "oneline" the region doesn't start if the end pattern
|
|
doesn't match in the same line. Without "oneline" Vim does _not_
|
|
check if there is a match for the end pattern. The region starts even
|
|
when the end pattern doesn't match in the rest of the file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTINUATION LINES AND AVOIDING THEM
|
|
|
|
Things now become a little more complex. Let's define a preprocessor line.
|
|
This starts with a # in the first column and continues until the end of the
|
|
line. A line that ends with \ makes the next line a continuation line. The
|
|
way you handle this is to allow the syntax item to contain a continuation
|
|
pattern: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xPreProc start=/^#/ end=/$/ contains=xLineContinue
|
|
:syntax match xLineContinue "\\$" contained
|
|
|
|
In this case, although xPreProc normally matches a single line, the group
|
|
contained in it (namely xLineContinue) lets it go on for more than one line.
|
|
For example, it would match both of these lines:
|
|
|
|
#define SPAM spam spam spam \ ~
|
|
bacon and spam ~
|
|
|
|
In this case, this is what you want. If it is not what you want, you can call
|
|
for the region to be on a single line by adding "excludenl" to the contained
|
|
pattern. For example, you want to highlight "end" in xPreProc, but only at
|
|
the end of the line. To avoid making the xPreProc continue on the next line,
|
|
like xLineContinue does, use "excludenl" like this: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax region xPreProc start=/^#/ end=/$/
|
|
\ contains=xLineContinue,xPreProcEnd
|
|
:syntax match xPreProcEnd excludenl /end$/ contained
|
|
:syntax match xLineContinue "\\$" contained
|
|
|
|
"excludenl" must be placed before the pattern. Since "xLineContinue" doesn't
|
|
have "excludenl", a match with it will extend xPreProc to the next line as
|
|
before.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.8* Clusters
|
|
|
|
One of the things you will notice as you start to write a syntax file is that
|
|
you wind up generating a lot of syntax groups. Vim enables you to define a
|
|
collection of syntax groups called a cluster.
|
|
Suppose you have a language that contains for loops, if statements, while
|
|
loops, and functions. Each of them contains the same syntax elements: numbers
|
|
and identifiers. You define them like this: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax match xFor /^for.*/ contains=xNumber,xIdent
|
|
:syntax match xIf /^if.*/ contains=xNumber,xIdent
|
|
:syntax match xWhile /^while.*/ contains=xNumber,xIdent
|
|
|
|
You have to repeat the same "contains=" every time. If you want to add
|
|
another contained item, you have to add it three times. Syntax clusters
|
|
simplify these definitions by enabling you to have one cluster stand for
|
|
several syntax groups.
|
|
To define a cluster for the two items that the three groups contain, use
|
|
the following command: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax cluster xState contains=xNumber,xIdent
|
|
|
|
Clusters are used inside other syntax items just like any syntax group.
|
|
Their names start with @. Thus, you can define the three groups like this: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax match xFor /^for.*/ contains=@xState
|
|
:syntax match xIf /^if.*/ contains=@xState
|
|
:syntax match xWhile /^while.*/ contains=@xState
|
|
|
|
You can add new group names to this cluster with the "add" argument: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax cluster xState add=xString
|
|
|
|
You can remove syntax groups from this list as well: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax cluster xState remove=xNumber
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.9* Including another syntax file
|
|
|
|
The C++ language syntax is a superset of the C language. Because you do not
|
|
want to write two syntax files, you can have the C++ syntax file read in the
|
|
one for C by using the following command: >
|
|
|
|
:runtime! syntax/c.vim
|
|
|
|
The ":runtime!" command searches 'runtimepath' for all "syntax/c.vim" files.
|
|
This makes the C parts of the C++ syntax be defined like for C files. If you
|
|
have replaced the c.vim syntax file, or added items with an extra file, these
|
|
will be loaded as well.
|
|
After loading the C syntax items the specific C++ items can be defined.
|
|
For example, add keywords that are not used in C: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax keyword cppStatement new delete this friend using
|
|
|
|
This works just like in any other syntax file.
|
|
|
|
Now consider the Perl language. A Perl script consists of two distinct parts:
|
|
a documentation section in POD format, and a program written in Perl itself.
|
|
The POD section starts with "=head" and ends with "=cut".
|
|
You want to define the POD syntax in one file, and use it from the Perl
|
|
syntax file. The ":syntax include" command reads in a syntax file and stores
|
|
the elements it defined in a syntax cluster. For Perl, the statements are as
|
|
follows: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax include @Pod <sfile>:p:h/pod.vim
|
|
:syntax region perlPOD start=/^=head/ end=/^=cut/ contains=@Pod
|
|
|
|
When "=head" is found in a Perl file, the perlPOD region starts. In this
|
|
region the @Pod cluster is contained. All the items defined as top-level
|
|
items in the pod.vim syntax files will match here. When "=cut" is found, the
|
|
region ends and we go back to the items defined in the Perl file.
|
|
The ":syntax include" command is clever enough to ignore a ":syntax clear"
|
|
command in the included file. And an argument such as "contains=ALL" will
|
|
only contain items defined in the included file, not in the file that includes
|
|
it.
|
|
The "<sfile>:p:h/" part uses the name of the current file (<sfile>),
|
|
expands it to a full path (:p) and then takes the head (:h). This results in
|
|
the directory name of the file. This causes the pod.vim file in the same
|
|
directory to be included.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.10* Synchronizing
|
|
|
|
Compilers have it easy. They start at the beginning of a file and parse it
|
|
straight through. Vim does not have it so easy. It must start in the middle,
|
|
where the editing is being done. So how does it tell where it is?
|
|
The secret is the ":syntax sync" command. This tells Vim how to figure out
|
|
where it is. For example, the following command tells Vim to scan backward
|
|
for the beginning or end of a C-style comment and begin syntax coloring from
|
|
there: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax sync ccomment
|
|
|
|
You can tune this processing with some arguments. The "minlines" argument
|
|
tells Vim the minimum number of lines to look backward, and "maxlines" tells
|
|
the editor the maximum number of lines to scan.
|
|
For example, the following command tells Vim to look at least 10 lines
|
|
before the top of the screen: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax sync ccomment minlines=10 maxlines=500
|
|
|
|
If it cannot figure out where it is in that space, it starts looking farther
|
|
and farther back until it figures out what to do. But it looks no farther
|
|
back than 500 lines. (A large "maxlines" slows down processing. A small one
|
|
might cause synchronization to fail.)
|
|
To make synchronizing go a bit faster, tell Vim which syntax items can be
|
|
skipped. Every match and region that only needs to be used when actually
|
|
displaying text can be given the "display" argument.
|
|
By default, the comment to be found will be colored as part of the Comment
|
|
syntax group. If you want to color things another way, you can specify a
|
|
different syntax group: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax sync ccomment xAltComment
|
|
|
|
If your programming language does not have C-style comments in it, you can try
|
|
another method of synchronization. The simplest way is to tell Vim to space
|
|
back a number of lines and try to figure out things from there. The following
|
|
command tells Vim to go back 150 lines and start parsing from there: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax sync minlines=150
|
|
|
|
A large "minlines" value can make Vim slower, especially when scrolling
|
|
backwards in the file.
|
|
Finally, you can specify a syntax group to look for by using this command:
|
|
>
|
|
:syntax sync match {sync-group-name}
|
|
\ grouphere {group-name} {pattern}
|
|
|
|
This tells Vim that when it sees {pattern} the syntax group named {group-name}
|
|
begins just after the pattern given. The {sync-group-name} is used to give a
|
|
name to this synchronization specification. For example, the sh scripting
|
|
language begins an if statement with "if" and ends it with "fi":
|
|
|
|
if [ --f file.txt ] ; then ~
|
|
echo "File exists" ~
|
|
fi ~
|
|
|
|
To define a "grouphere" directive for this syntax, you use the following
|
|
command: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax sync match shIfSync grouphere shIf "\<if\>"
|
|
|
|
The "groupthere" argument tells Vim that the pattern ends a group. For
|
|
example, the end of the if/fi group is as follows: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax sync match shIfSync groupthere NONE "\<fi\>"
|
|
|
|
In this example, the NONE tells Vim that you are not in any special syntax
|
|
region. In particular, you are not inside an if block.
|
|
|
|
You also can define matches and regions that are with no "grouphere" or
|
|
"groupthere" arguments. These groups are for syntax groups skipped during
|
|
synchronization. For example, the following skips over anything inside {},
|
|
even if it would normally match another synchronization method: >
|
|
|
|
:syntax sync match xSpecial /{.*}/
|
|
|
|
More about synchronizing in the reference manual: |:syn-sync|.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.11* Installing a syntax file
|
|
|
|
When your new syntax file is ready to be used, drop it in a "syntax" directory
|
|
in 'runtimepath'. For Unix that would be "~/.config/nvim/syntax".
|
|
The name of the syntax file must be equal to the file type, with ".vim"
|
|
added. Thus for the x language, the full path of the file would be:
|
|
|
|
~/.config/nvim/syntax/x.vim ~
|
|
|
|
You must also make the file type be recognized. See |43.2|.
|
|
|
|
If your file works well, you might want to make it available to other Vim
|
|
users. First read the next section to make sure your file works well for
|
|
others. Then e-mail it to the Vim maintainer: <maintainer@vim.org>. Also
|
|
explain how the filetype can be detected. With a bit of luck your file will
|
|
be included in the next Vim version!
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADDING TO AN EXISTING SYNTAX FILE
|
|
|
|
We were assuming you were adding a completely new syntax file. When an existing
|
|
syntax file works, but is missing some items, you can add items in a separate
|
|
file. That avoids changing the distributed syntax file, which will be lost
|
|
when installing a new version of Vim.
|
|
Write syntax commands in your file, possibly using group names from the
|
|
existing syntax. For example, to add new variable types to the C syntax file:
|
|
>
|
|
:syntax keyword cType off_t uint
|
|
|
|
Write the file with the same name as the original syntax file. In this case
|
|
"c.vim". Place it in a directory near the end of 'runtimepath'. This makes
|
|
it loaded after the original syntax file. For Unix this would be:
|
|
|
|
~/.config/nvim/after/syntax/c.vim ~
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
*44.12* Portable syntax file layout
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't it be nice if all Vim users exchange syntax files? To make this
|
|
possible, the syntax file must follow a few guidelines.
|
|
|
|
Start with a header that explains what the syntax file is for, who maintains
|
|
it and when it was last updated. Don't include too much information about
|
|
changes history, not many people will read it. Example: >
|
|
|
|
" Vim syntax file
|
|
" Language: C
|
|
" Maintainer: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
|
|
" Last Change: 2001 Jun 18
|
|
" Remark: Included by the C++ syntax.
|
|
|
|
Use the same layout as the other syntax files. Using an existing syntax file
|
|
as an example will save you a lot of time.
|
|
|
|
Choose a good, descriptive name for your syntax file. Use lowercase letters
|
|
and digits. Don't make it too long, it is used in many places: The name of
|
|
the syntax file "name.vim", 'filetype', b:current_syntax and the start of each
|
|
syntax group (nameType, nameStatement, nameString, etc).
|
|
|
|
Start with a check for "b:current_syntax". If it is defined, some other
|
|
syntax file, earlier in 'runtimepath' was already loaded: >
|
|
|
|
if exists("b:current_syntax")
|
|
finish
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
To be compatible with Vim 5.8 use: >
|
|
|
|
if version < 600
|
|
syntax clear
|
|
elseif exists("b:current_syntax")
|
|
finish
|
|
endif
|
|
|
|
Set "b:current_syntax" to the name of the syntax at the end. Don't forget
|
|
that included files do this too, you might have to reset "b:current_syntax" if
|
|
you include two files.
|
|
|
|
If you want your syntax file to work with Vim 5.x, add a check for v:version.
|
|
Find an syntax file in the Vim 7.2 distribution for an example.
|
|
|
|
Do not include anything that is a user preference. Don't set 'tabstop',
|
|
'expandtab', etc. These belong in a filetype plugin.
|
|
|
|
Do not include mappings or abbreviations. Only include setting 'iskeyword' if
|
|
it is really necessary for recognizing keywords.
|
|
|
|
To allow users select their own preferred colors, make a different group name
|
|
for every kind of highlighted item. Then link each of them to one of the
|
|
standard highlight groups. That will make it work with every color scheme.
|
|
If you select specific colors it will look bad with some color schemes. And
|
|
don't forget that some people use a different background color, or have only
|
|
eight colors available.
|
|
|
|
For the linking use "hi def link", so that the user can select different
|
|
highlighting before your syntax file is loaded. Example: >
|
|
|
|
hi def link nameString String
|
|
hi def link nameNumber Number
|
|
hi def link nameCommand Statement
|
|
... etc ...
|
|
|
|
Add the "display" argument to items that are not used when syncing, to speed
|
|
up scrolling backwards and CTRL-L.
|
|
|
|
==============================================================================
|
|
|
|
Next chapter: |usr_45.txt| Select your language
|
|
|
|
Copyright: see |manual-copyright| vim:tw=78:ts=8:ft=help:norl:
|