mirror of
https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
synced 2024-12-20 11:15:14 -07:00
9b028bd64f
Problem:
vim.iter has both `rfind()` and various `*back()` methods, which work
in "reverse" or "backwards" order. It's inconsistent to have both kinds
of names, and "back" is fairly uncommon (rust) compared to python
(rfind, rstrip, rsplit, …).
Solution:
- Remove `nthback()` and let `nth()` take a negative index.
- Because `rnth()` looks pretty obscure, and because it's intuitive
for a function named `nth()` to take negative indexes.
- Rename `xxback()` methods to `rxx()`.
- This informally groups the "list-iterator" functions under a common
`r` prefix, which helps discoverability.
- Rename `peekback()` to `pop()`, in duality with the existing `peek`.
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| nvim | ||
| provider | ||
| vim | ||
| _vim9script.lua | ||
| coxpcall.lua | ||
| editorconfig.lua | ||
| man.lua | ||
| tohtml.lua | ||