Before calling "attach" a screen object is just a dummy container for
(row, col) values whose purpose is to be sent as part of the "attach"
function call anyway.
Just create the screen in an attached state directly. Keep the complete
(row, col, options) config together. It is still completely valid to
later detach and re-attach as needed, including to another session.
Specifically, functions that are run in the context of the test runner
are put in module `test/testutil.lua` while the functions that are run
in the context of the test session are put in
`test/functional/testnvim.lua`.
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
This is the first installment of a multi-PR series significantly
refactoring how highlights are being specified.
The end goal is to have a base set of 20 ish most common highlights,
and then specific files only need to add more groups to that as needed.
As a complicating factor, we also want to migrate to the new default
color scheme eventually. But by sharing a base set, that future PR
will hopefully be a lot smaller since a lot of tests will be migrated
just simply by updating the base set in place.
As a first step, fix the anti-pattern than Screen defaults to ignoring
highlights. Highlights are integral part of the screen state, not
something "extra" which we only test "sometimes". For now, we still
allow opt-out via the intentionally ugly
screen._default_attr_ids = nil
The end goal is to get rid of all of these eventually (which will be
easier as part of the color scheme migration)
These were just added to avoid churn when changing the default
of 'display'. To simplify message handling logic, we might want
to remove support for printing messages in default_grid later on.
This would allow things like printing error messages safely in the
middle of redraw, or a future graduation of the 'multigrid' feature.
Hope this will make people using feed_command less likely: this hides bugs.
Already found at least two:
1. msgpackparse() will show internal error: hash_add() in case of duplicate
keys, though it will still work correctly. Currently silenced.
2. ttimeoutlen was spelled incorrectly, resulting in option not being set when
expected. Test was still functioning somehow though. Currently fixed.
- Vim "unix default" of 'noshowcmd' is serving few users. And it's
inconsistent.
- 'ruler' and 'belloff=all' improve the out-of-the-box experience.
- Continue to use 'noshowcmd' and 'noruler' by default in the functional
tests to keep them fast.
TODO: Add a "disable slow stuff" command or mapping to address the
use-case of a very slow terminal connection.
https://github.com/mpeterv/luacheck/pull/81#issuecomment-261099606
> If you really want to use bleeding-edge version you should get the
> rockspec from master branch, not a fixed commit ...
> The correct way to install from a specific commit is cloning that
> commit and running "luarocks make" from project directory. The reason
> is that running "install" or "build" on an scm rockspec fetches
> sources from master but uses build description from the rockspec
> itself, which may be outdated.
In 3b12bb225a, ":oldfiles" was taught to
behave like Vim's ":browse oldfiles" if ":oldfiles!" was used. However,
this conflates the use of ! for abandoning a modified buffer with
choosing one file out of a list of oldfiles.
Now that ":browse" is supported again, ":browse oldfiles" will allow the
user to select an old file, while still complaining if that would cause
a modified buffer to be abandoned. ":browse oldfiles!" will just
abandon the buffer, as expected.
It is otherwise impossible to determine which test failed sanitizer/valgrind
check. test/functional/helpers.lua module return was changed so that tests which
do not provide after_each function to get new check will automatically fail.
- change approach for test 1: screen:expect() instead of assert()
- use execute() instead of command()
- 2 new tests that check none and wrong input for :oldfiles!
Helped-by: @fwalch
Helped-by: @tarruda
Helper-by: @justinmk
