Problem:
Higher-priority signs may be hidden by lower-priority signs.
Solution:
Place higher-priority signs from the left.
Example:
nvim_buf_set_extmark(0, ns, 0, -1, {sign_text='H', priority=1})
nvim_buf_set_extmark(0, ns, 0, -1, {sign_text='W', priority=2})
nvim_buf_set_extmark(0, ns, 0, -1, {sign_text='E', priority=3})
Before:
| |
H | W E |
^ | |
Not visible
After:
| |
| E W | H
| | ^
Not visible
Fixes#16632
This avoids redraw when adding/removing an empty namespace for a window.
This also avoids marktree traversal when clearing a namespace that has
already been cleared, which is added as a benchmark.
Specifically, functions that are run in the context of the test runner
are put in module `test/testutil.lua` while the functions that are run
in the context of the test session are put in
`test/functional/testnvim.lua`.
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
This is the first installment of a multi-PR series significantly
refactoring how highlights are being specified.
The end goal is to have a base set of 20 ish most common highlights,
and then specific files only need to add more groups to that as needed.
As a complicating factor, we also want to migrate to the new default
color scheme eventually. But by sharing a base set, that future PR
will hopefully be a lot smaller since a lot of tests will be migrated
just simply by updating the base set in place.
As a first step, fix the anti-pattern than Screen defaults to ignoring
highlights. Highlights are integral part of the screen state, not
something "extra" which we only test "sometimes". For now, we still
allow opt-out via the intentionally ugly
screen._default_attr_ids = nil
The end goal is to get rid of all of these eventually (which will be
easier as part of the color scheme migration)
The "priority" field of extmarks can be used to set priorities of
extmarks which dictates which highlight group a range will actually have
when there are multiple extmarks applied. However, when multiple
extmarks have the same priority, the only way to enforce an actual
priority is through the order in which the extmarks are set.
It is not always possible or desirable to set extmarks in a specific
order, however, so we add a new "subpriority" field that explicitly
enforces the ordering of extmarks that have the same priority.
For now this will be used only to enforce priority of treesitter
highlights. A single node in a treesitter tree may match multiple
captures, in which case that node will have multiple extmarks set. The
order in which captures are returned from the treesitter API is not
_necessarily_ in the same order they are defined in a query file, so we
use the new subpriority field to force that ordering.
For now subpriorites are not documented and are not meant to be used by
external code, and it only applies to ephemeral extmarks. We indicate
the "private" nature of subpriorities by prefixing the field name with
an "_".
Extmarks can contain URLs which can then be drawn in any supporting UI.
In the TUI, for example, URLs are "drawn" by emitting the OSC 8 control
sequence to the TTY. On terminals which support the OSC 8 sequence this
will create clickable hyperlinks.
URLs are treated as inline highlights in the decoration subsystem, so
are included in the `DecorSignHighlight` structure. However, unlike
other inline highlights they use allocated memory which must be freed,
so they set the `ext` flag in `DecorInline` so that their lifetimes are
managed along with other allocated memory like virtual text.
The decoration subsystem then adds the URLs as a new highlight
attribute. The highlight subsystem maintains a set of unique URLs to
avoid duplicating allocations for the same string. To attach a URL to an
existing highlight attribute we call `hl_add_url` which finds the URL in
the set (allocating and adding it if it does not exist) and sets the
`url` highlight attribute to the index of the URL in the set (using an
index helps keep the size of the `HlAttrs` struct small).
This has the potential to lead to an increase in highlight attributes
if a URL is used over a range that contains many different highlight
attributes, because now each existing attribute must be combined with
the URL. In practice, however, URLs typically span a range containing a
single highlight (e.g. link text in Markdown), so this is likely just a
pathological edge case.
When a new highlight attribute is defined with a URL it is copied to all
attached UIs with the `hl_attr_define` UI event. The TUI manages its own
set of URLs (just like the highlight subsystem) to minimize allocations.
The TUI keeps track of which URL is "active" for the cell it is
printing. If no URL is active and a cell containing a URL is printed,
the opening OSC 8 sequence is emitted and that URL becomes the actively
tracked URL. If the cursor is moved while in the middle of a URL span,
we emit the terminating OSC sequence to prevent the hyperlink from
spanning multiple lines.
This does not support nested hyperlinks, but that is a rare (and,
frankly, bizarre) use case. If a valid use case for nested hyperlinks
ever presents itself we can address that issue then.
Problem: Unable to predict which byte-offset to place virtual text to
make it repeat visually in the wrapped part of a line.
Solution: Add a flag to nvim_buf_set_extmark() that causes virtual
text to repeat in wrapped lines.
This is the command invoked repeatedly to make the changes:
:%s/^\(.*\)|\%(\*\(\d\+\)\)\?$\n\1|\%(\*\(\d\+\)\)\?$/\=submatch(1)..'|*'..(max([str2nr(submatch(2)),1])+max([str2nr(submatch(3)),1]))/g
Problem: Unable to identify legacy signs when fetching extmarks with
`nvim_buf_get_extmarks()`.
Solution: Add "sign_name" to the extmark detail array.
Add some misc. changes as follow-up to #25724
Remove the monolithic Decoration struct. Before this change, each extmark
could either represent just a hl_id + priority value as a inline
decoration, or it would take a pointer to this monolitic 112 byte struct
which has to be allocated.
This change separates the decorations into two pieces: DecorSignHighlight
for signs, highlights and simple set-flag decorations (like spell,
ui-watched), and DecorVirtText for virtual text and lines.
The main separation here is whether they are expected to allocate more
memory. Currently this is not really true as sign text has to be an
allocated string, but the plan is to get rid of this eventually (it can
just be an array of two schar_T:s). Further refactors are expected to
improve the representation of each decoration kind individually. The
goal of this particular PR is to get things started by cutting the
Gordian knot which was the monolithic struct Decoration.
Now, each extmark can either contain chained indicies/pointers to
these kinds of objects, or it can fit a subset of DecorSignHighlight
inline.
The point of this change is not only to make decorations smaller in
memory. In fact, the main motivation is to later allow them to grow
_larger_, but on a dynamic, on demand fashion. As a simple example, it
would be possible to augment highlights to take a list of multiple
`hl_group`:s, which then would trivially map to a chain of multiple
DecorSignHighlight entries.
One small feature improvement included with this refactor itself, is
that the restriction that extmarks cannot be removed inside a decoration
provider has been lifted. These are instead safely lifetime extended
on a "to free" list until the current iteration of screen drawing is done.
NB: flags is a mess. but DecorLevel is useless, this slightly less so
Problem: No way to have extmarks automatically removed when the range it
is attached to is deleted.
Solution: Add new 'invalidate' property that will hide a mark when the
entirety of its range is deleted. When "undo_restore" is set
to false, delete the mark from the buffer instead.
If you would insert element X at position j, then if you are moving that
same element X from position i < j, you should move it to position j -
1, because you are losing an element.
This error caused a gap to be left in the array, so that it looked like
[x, null, y] instead of [x, y], where len = 2. This triggered #25147.
Fixes: #25147
The removes the previous restriction that nvim_buf_set_extmark()
could not be used to highlight arbitrary multi-line regions
The problem can be summarized as follows: let's assume an extmark with a
hl_group is placed covering the region (5,0) to (50,0) Now, consider
what happens if nvim needs to redraw a window covering the lines 20-30.
It needs to be able to ask the marktree what extmarks cover this region,
even if they don't begin or end here.
Therefore the marktree needs to be augmented with the information covers
a point, not just what marks begin or end there. To do this, we augment
each node with a field "intersect" which is a set the ids of the
marks which overlap this node, but only if it is not part of the set of
any parent. This ensures the number of nodes that need to be explicitly
marked grows only logarithmically with the total number of explicitly
nodes (and thus the number of of overlapping marks).
Thus we can quickly iterate all marks which overlaps any query position
by looking up what leaf node contains that position. Then we only need
to consider all "start" marks within that leaf node, and the "intersect"
set of that node and all its parents.
Now, and the major source of complexity is that the tree restructuring
operations (to ensure that each node has T-1 <= size <= 2*T-1) also need
to update these sets. If a full inner node is split in two, one of the
new parents might start to completely overlap some ranges and its ids
will need to be moved from its children's sets to its own set.
Similarly, if two undersized nodes gets joined into one, it might no
longer completely overlap some ranges, and now the children which do
needs to have the have the ids in its set instead. And then there are
the pivots! Yes the pivot operations when a child gets moved from one
parent to another.
`nvim_(get|set)_option_value` pick the current buffer / window by default for buffer-local/window-local (but not global-local) options. So specifying `buf = 0` or `win = 0` in opts is unnecessary for those options. This PR removes those to reduce code clutter.
Problem: Can not get all extmarks in a buffer. Properties are missing
from the details array.
Solution: Allow getting all extmarks in a buffer by supplying a -1
"ns_id". Add missing properties to the details array.
Problem:
Validation messages are not consistently formatted.
- Parameter names sometimes are NOT quoted.
- Descriptive names (non-parameters) sometimes ARE quoted.
Solution:
Always quote the `name` value passed to a VALIDATE macro _unless_ the
value has whitespace.
Problem:
- API validation involves too much boilerplate.
- API validation errors are not consistently worded.
Solution:
Introduce some macros. Currently these are clumsy, but they at least
help with consistency and avoid some nesting.
nvim_buf_get_extmark uses "end_row" rather than "end_line" in its
'details' dict, which means callers must modify the key names if they
want to re-use the information. Change the parameter name in
nvim_buf_set_extmark to "end_row" and use "end_line" as an alias
to make this more consistent.
