Specifically, functions that are run in the context of the test runner
are put in module `test/testutil.lua` while the functions that are run
in the context of the test session are put in
`test/functional/testnvim.lua`.
Closes https://github.com/neovim/neovim/issues/27004.
This reverts commit 4382d2ed56.
The story for this feature was left in an incomplete state. It was never
the intention to unilaterally fold all information, only the ones that
did not contain relevant information. This feature does more harm than
good in its incomplete state.
`exec_lua` makes code slighly harder to read, so it's beneficial to
remove it in cases where it's possible or convenient.
Not all `exec_lua` calls should be removed even if the test passes as it
changes the semantics of the test even if it happens to pass.
From https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/28155#discussion_r1548185779:
"Note for tests like this, which fundamentally are about conversion, you
end up changing what conversion you are testing. Even if the result
happens to be same (as they often are, as we like the rules to be
consistent if possible), you are now testing the RPC conversion rules
instead of the vim script to in-process lua conversion rules."
From https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/28155#discussion_r1548190152:
"A test like this specifies that the cursor is valid immediately and not
after a separate cycle of normal (or an other input-processing) mode."
This is the first installment of a multi-PR series significantly
refactoring how highlights are being specified.
The end goal is to have a base set of 20 ish most common highlights,
and then specific files only need to add more groups to that as needed.
As a complicating factor, we also want to migrate to the new default
color scheme eventually. But by sharing a base set, that future PR
will hopefully be a lot smaller since a lot of tests will be migrated
just simply by updating the base set in place.
As a first step, fix the anti-pattern than Screen defaults to ignoring
highlights. Highlights are integral part of the screen state, not
something "extra" which we only test "sometimes". For now, we still
allow opt-out via the intentionally ugly
screen._default_attr_ids = nil
The end goal is to get rid of all of these eventually (which will be
easier as part of the color scheme migration)
This replaces the custom `health{Error,Warning,Success}` highlight
groups with `Diagnostic{Error,Warning,Ok}`, which are defined by
default. Removes the link for `healthHelp`, which was no longer
actually used after #20879.
- If Nvim was just started, don't create a new tab.
- Name the buffer "health://".
- Use "help" syntax instead of "markdown". It fits better, and
eliminates various workarounds.
- Simplfy formatting, avoid visual noise.
- Don't print a "INFO" status, it is noisy.
- Drop the ":" after statuses, they are already UPPERCASE and highlighted.
Problem:
https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/18720#issuecomment-1142614996
The vim.health module is detected as a healthcheck, which produces spurious errors:
vim: require("vim.health").check()
========================================================================
- ERROR: Failed to run healthcheck for "vim" plugin. Exception:
function health#check, line 20
Vim(eval):E5108: Error executing lua [string "luaeval()"]:1: attempt to call field 'check' (a nil value)
stack traceback:
[string "luaeval()"]:1: in main chunk
Solution:
Skip vim.health when discovering healthchecks.
The runtime file update
2286304cdb
added a `syn keyword` for `css`, which affects (via `html` and
`markdown` syntax files) the highlighting of `:checkhealth` output
(before, `ERROR:` was highlighted with `healthError`; now the colon is
no longer included).
* fix(runtime/health): mitigate issues with duplicate healthchecks
Previously if a healthcheck was found as Lua and Vim it was executed
both times.
This new implementations prefers Lua, therefore if two are found It only
runs the Lua one, this way a plugin can mantain both implementations the
Lua one with the method `check()` and the autoload function `#check()`
(for none HEAD nvim versions).
**Note: This will require plugins to use `check()` as the function name,
since the autoload function that wraps the lua implementation won't be
called**
* docs(health): use spaces and don't overuse backtics
followup to #15259
Move away from providing completion with ExpandRTDir to ExpandGeneric
providing the function get_healthcheck_name which caches the results for
the current command line prompt.
It does the almost the same thing the Vim function 'get_healthcheck'
implemented in 'runtime/autoload/health.vim' does.
- Add tests for lua healthchecks (failure, success and submodules).
- Reword some of the test naming for improved logs readability.
- Modify render test to accomodate the changes of the health autoload function.
- Add test for :checkhealth completion of Lua healtchecks.
`:syntax keyword` is affected by 'iskeyword'. When we aligned
'iskeyword' to that of filetype=help, colon (:) is now included.
Simplest way to deal with this is to include colon (:) in the `:syntax
keyword` directive.
Also:
- change "SUGGESTIONS" mouthful to "ADVICE"
- change "SUCCESS" to "OK"
Hope this will make people using feed_command less likely: this hides bugs.
Already found at least two:
1. msgpackparse() will show internal error: hash_add() in case of duplicate
keys, though it will still work correctly. Currently silenced.
2. ttimeoutlen was spelled incorrectly, resulting in option not being set when
expected. Test was still functioning somehow though. Currently fixed.
* health.vim: Include v:throwpoint in error message
* health/provider.vim: Check for ruby executable
* health/provider.vim: Combine subprocess stdout and stderr
* test: Updated CheckHealth test
To healthcheck the "foo" plugin:
:CheckHealth foo
To healthcheck the "foo" and "bar" plugins:
:CheckHealth foo bar
To run all auto-discovered healthchecks:
:CheckHealth
- Use execute() instead of redir
- Fixed logic on suboptimal pyenv/virtualenv checks.
- Move system calls from strings to lists. Fixes#5218
- Add highlighting
- Automatically discover health checkers
- Add tests
Helped-by: Shougo Matsushita <Shougo.Matsu@gmail.com>
Helped-by: Tommy Allen <tommy@esdf.io>
Closes#4932
