Problem: the recursive parameter in the *_equal functions can be removed
Solution: Remove the recursive parameter in dict_equal(), list_equal()
object_equal and tv_equal(). Use a comparison of the static
var recursive_cnt == 0 to determine whether or not tv_equal()
has been called recursively (Yinzuo Jiang).
closes: vim/vim#150707ccd1a2e85
Co-authored-by: Yinzuo Jiang <jiangyinzuo@foxmail.com>
Problem:
Not all Lua code is checked by stylua. Automating code-style is an
important mechanism for reducing time spent on accidental
(non-essential) complexity.
Solution:
- Enable lintlua for `test/unit/` directory.
- TODO: only `test/functional/` remains unchecked.
previous: 45fe4d11ad
previous: 517f0cc634
Problem: Cannot use positional arguments for printf()
Solution: Support positional arguments in string formatting
closes: vim/vim#121400c6181fec4
Co-authored-by: Christ van Willegen <cvwillegen@gmail.com>
Adjust relevant Lua tests. Refactor testing logic for tv_get_string_*
functions into test_string_fn().
Note that vim_snprintf(), which is used for stringifying floats, always
calls xfree(tofree), even if tofree is NULL, so we need to expect that
in the alloc log.
Problem: Vim9: builtin function arguments not checked at compile time.
Solution: Add more type checks. (Yegappan Lakshmanan, closesvim/vim#8539)
5b73992d8f
Co-authored-by: Yegappan Lakshmanan <yegappan@yahoo.com>
Problem: Vim9: script cannot use line continuation like in a :def function.
Solution: Pass the getline function pointer to the eval() functions. Use it
for addition and multiplication operators.
5409f5d8c9
Omit source_nextline() and eval_next_non_blank(): Vim9 script only.
N/A patches for version.c:
vim-patch:8.2.1048: build failure without the eval feature
Problem: Build failure without the eval feature.
Solution: Add dummy typedef.
9d40c63c7d
vim-patch:8.2.1052: build failure with older compilers
Problem: Build failure with older compilers.
Solution: Move declaration to start of block.
7acde51832
Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
vim-patch:8.2.0695: Vim9: cannot define a function inside a function
Problem: Vim9: cannot define a function inside a function.
Solution: Initial support for :def inside :def.
04b1269783
vim-patch:8.2.0725: Vim9: cannot call a function declared later in Vim9 script
Problem: Vim9: cannot call a function declared later in Vim9 script.
Solution: Make two passes through the script file.
09689a0284
vim-patch:8.2.0734: Vim9: leaking memory when using :finish
Problem: Vim9: leaking memory when using :finish.
Solution: Do not check for next line in third pass.
04816717df
vim-patch:8.2.0753: Vim9: expressions are evaluated in the discovery phase
Problem: Vim9: expressions are evaluated in the discovery phase.
Solution: Bail out if an expression is not a constant. Require a type for
declared constants.
32e351179e
vim-patch:8.2.0818: Vim9: using a discovery phase doesn't work well
Problem: Vim9: using a discovery phase doesn't work well.
Solution: Remove the discovery phase, instead compile a function only when
it is used. Add :defcompile to compile def functions earlier.
822ba24743
vim-patch:8.2.0819: compiler warning for unused variable
Problem: Compiler warning for unused variable.
Solution: Remove the variable.
f40e51a880
vim-patch:8.2.0822: Vim9: code left over from discovery phase
Problem: Vim9: code left over from discovery phase.
Solution: Remove the dead code.
2eec37926d
Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
Problem: Cannot lock a variable in legacy Vim script like in Vim9.
Solution: Make ":lockvar 0" work.
a187c43cfe
Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
Problem: map() returing zero for NULL list is unexpected.
Solution: Return the empty list. (closesvim/vim#7133)
ffdf8adfa8
Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
Problem: Items in a list given to :const can still be modified.
Solution: Work like ":lockvar! name" but don't lock referenced items.
Make locking a blob work.
021bda5671
Problem: Comparing two NULL list fails.
Solution: Change the order of comparing two lists.
7b293c730b
N/A patches for version.c:
vim-patch:8.2.1187: terminal2 test sometimes hangs in the GUI on Travis
Problem: Terminal2 test sometimes hangs in the GUI on Travis.
Solution: Disable Test_zz2_terminal_guioptions_bang() for now.
c85156bb89
vim-patch:8.2.1188: memory leak with invalid json input
Problem: Memory leak with invalid json input.
Solution: Free all keys at the end. (Dominique Pellé, closesvim/vim#6443,
closesvim/vim#6442)
6d3a7213f5
vim-patch:8.2.1196: build failure with normal features
Problem: Build failure with normal features.
Solution: Add #ifdef.
83e7450053
vim-patch:8.2.1198: terminal2 test sometimes hangs in the GUI on Travis
Problem: Terminal2 test sometimes hangs in the GUI on Travis.
Solution: Move test function to terminal3 to see if the problem moves too.
a4b442614c
Problem: Dict and list could be GC'ed while displaying error in a timer.
(Yasuhiro Matsumoto)
Solution: Block garbage collection when executing a timer. Add
test_garbagecollect_soon(). Add "no_wait_return" to
test_override(). (closesvim/vim#4571)
adc6714aac
The test.functional.helpers and test.unit.helpers modules now include
all of the public functions from test.helpers, so there is no need to
separately require('test.helpers').
Currently supported nodes:
- Register as it is one of the simplest value nodes (even numbers are
not that simple with that dot handling).
- Plus, both unary and binary.
- Parenthesis, both nesting and calling.
Note regarding unit tests: it stores data for AST in highlighting in
strings in place of tables because luassert fails to do a good job at
representing big tables. Squashing a bunch of data into a single string
simply yields more readable result.
Not using enum{} because SIZE_MAX exceeds integer and I do not really like how
enum definition is described in C99:
1. Even though all values must fit into the chosen type (6.7.2.2, p 4) the type
to choose is still implementation-defined.
2. 6.4.4.3 explicitly states that “an identifier declared as an enumeration
constant has type `int`”. So it looks like “no matter what type was chosen
for enumeration, constants will be integers”. Yet the following simple
program:
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stddef.h>
enum { X=SIZE_MAX };
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
printf("x:%zu m:%zu t:%zu v:%zu",
sizeof(X), sizeof(SIZE_MAX), sizeof(size_t), (size_t)X);
}
yields one of the following using different compilers:
- clang/gcc/pathcc: `x:8 m:8 t:8 v:18446744073709551615`
- pcc/tcc: `x:4 m:8 t:8 v:1844674407370955161`
If I remove the cast of X to size_t then pcc/tcc both yield `x:4 m:8 t:8
v:4294967295`, other compilers’ output does not change.
All compilers were called with `$compiler -std=c99 -xc -` (feeding program
from echo), except for `tcc` which has missing `-std=c99`. `pcc` seems to
ignore the argument though: it is perfectly fine with `-std=c1000`.
