From e0d998dbc8b8e7047e1cc2bb520aea4d0b34f726 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: zeertzjq Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 08:48:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] vim-patch:65672ae1189e (#26767) runtime(doc): clarify behaviour of ]m and ]M motions In particular remove the sentence, that a missing '{' (for ]m) or '}' (for ]M) after the cursor is an error, since currently this is not treated as an error. fixes: vim/vim#13777 https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/65672ae1189e0638fb68856598b98a2b7ee2a0a8 Co-authored-by: Christian Brabandt --- runtime/doc/motion.txt | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/runtime/doc/motion.txt b/runtime/doc/motion.txt index aa18e44225..b72dd8d39c 100644 --- a/runtime/doc/motion.txt +++ b/runtime/doc/motion.txt @@ -1292,14 +1292,12 @@ bring you back to the switch statement. ]m Go to [count] next start of a method (for Java or similar structured language). When not before the start of a method, jump to the start or end of the - class. When no '{' is found after the cursor, this is - an error. |exclusive| motion. + class. |exclusive| motion. *]M* ]M Go to [count] next end of a method (for Java or similar structured language). When not before the end of a method, jump to the start or end of the class. - When no '}' is found after the cursor, this is an - error. |exclusive| motion. + |exclusive| motion. *[m* [m Go to [count] previous start of a method (for Java or similar structured language). When not after the