mirror of
https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
synced 2024-12-29 14:41:06 -07:00
Start documenting code
This commit is contained in:
parent
ed985d06ef
commit
b4c82dba5c
190
src/nvim/README.md
Normal file
190
src/nvim/README.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
|
||||
## Source code overview
|
||||
|
||||
Since Neovim has inherited most code from Vim, some information in [its
|
||||
README](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vim/vim/master/src/README.txt) still
|
||||
applies.
|
||||
|
||||
This document aims to give a high level overview of how Neovim works internally,
|
||||
focusing on parts that are different from Vim. Currently this is still a work in
|
||||
progress, especially because I have avoided adding too many details about parts
|
||||
that are constantly changing. As the code becomes more organized and stable,
|
||||
this document will be updated to reflect the changes.
|
||||
|
||||
If you are looking for module-specific details, it is best to read the source
|
||||
code. Some files are extensively commented at the top(eg: terminal.c,
|
||||
screen.c).
|
||||
|
||||
### Top-level program loops
|
||||
|
||||
First let's understand what a Vim-like program does by analyzing the workflow of
|
||||
a typical editing session:
|
||||
|
||||
01. Vim dispays the welcome screen
|
||||
02. User types: `:`
|
||||
03. Vim enters command-line mode
|
||||
04. User types: `edit README.txt<CR>`
|
||||
05. Vim opens the file and returns to normal mode
|
||||
06. User types: `G`
|
||||
07. Vim navigates to the end of the file
|
||||
09. User types: `5`
|
||||
10. Vim enters count-pending mode
|
||||
11. User types: `d`
|
||||
12. Vim enters operator-pending mode
|
||||
13. User types: `w`
|
||||
14. Vim deletes 5 words
|
||||
15. User types: `g`
|
||||
16. Vim enters the "g command mode"
|
||||
17. User types: `g`
|
||||
18. Vim goes to the beginning of the file
|
||||
19. User types: `i`
|
||||
20. Vim enters insert mode
|
||||
21. User types: `word<ESC>`
|
||||
22. Vim inserts "word" at the beginning and returns to normal mode
|
||||
|
||||
Note that we have split user actions into sequences of inputs that change the
|
||||
state of the editor. While there's no documentation about a "g command
|
||||
mode"(step 16), internally it is implemented similarly to "operator-pending
|
||||
mode".
|
||||
|
||||
From this we can see that Vim has the behavior of a input-driven state
|
||||
machine(more specifically, a pushdown automaton since it requires a stack for
|
||||
transitioning back from states). Assuming each state has a callback responsible
|
||||
for handling keys, this pseudocode(a python-like language) shows a good
|
||||
representation of the main program loop:
|
||||
|
||||
```py
|
||||
def state_enter(state_callback, data):
|
||||
do
|
||||
key = readkey() # read a key from the user
|
||||
while state_callback(data, key) # invoke the callback for the current state
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
That is, each state is entered by calling `state_enter` and passing a
|
||||
state-specific callback and data. Here is a high-level pseudocode for a program
|
||||
that implements something like the workflow described above:
|
||||
|
||||
```py
|
||||
def main()
|
||||
state_enter(normal_state, {}):
|
||||
|
||||
def normal_state(data, key):
|
||||
if key == ':':
|
||||
state_enter(command_line_state, {})
|
||||
elif key == 'i':
|
||||
state_enter(insert_state, {})
|
||||
elif key == 'd':
|
||||
state_enter(delete_operator_state, {})
|
||||
elif key == 'g':
|
||||
state_enter(g_command_state, {})
|
||||
elif is_number(key):
|
||||
state_enter(get_operator_count_state, {'count': key})
|
||||
elif key == 'G'
|
||||
jump_to_eof()
|
||||
return true
|
||||
|
||||
def command_line_state(data, key):
|
||||
if key == '<cr>':
|
||||
if data['input']:
|
||||
execute_ex_command(data['input'])
|
||||
return false
|
||||
elif key == '<esc>'
|
||||
return false
|
||||
|
||||
if not data['input']:
|
||||
data['input'] = ''
|
||||
|
||||
data['input'] += key
|
||||
return true
|
||||
|
||||
def delete_operator_state(data, key):
|
||||
count = data['count'] or 1
|
||||
if key == 'w':
|
||||
delete_word(count)
|
||||
elif key == '$':
|
||||
delete_to_eol(count)
|
||||
return false # return to normal mode
|
||||
|
||||
def g_command_state(data, key):
|
||||
if key == 'g':
|
||||
go_top()
|
||||
elif key == 'v':
|
||||
reselect()
|
||||
return false # return to normal mode
|
||||
|
||||
def get_operator_count_state(data, key):
|
||||
if is_number(key):
|
||||
data['count'] += key
|
||||
return true
|
||||
unshift_key(key) # return key to the input buffer
|
||||
state_enter(delete_operator_state, data)
|
||||
return false
|
||||
|
||||
def insert_state(data, key):
|
||||
if key == '<esc>':
|
||||
return false # exit insert mode
|
||||
self_insert(key)
|
||||
return true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
While the actual code is much more complicated, the above gives an idea of how
|
||||
Neovim is organized internally. Some states like the `g_command_state` or
|
||||
`get_operator_count_state` do not have a dedicated `state_enter` callback, but
|
||||
are implicitly embedded into other states(this will change later as we continue
|
||||
the refactoring effort). To start reading the actual code, here's the
|
||||
recommended order:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `state_enter()` function(state.c). This is the actual program loop,
|
||||
note that a `VimState` structure is used, which contains function pointers
|
||||
for the callback and state data.
|
||||
2. `main()` function(main.c). After all startup, `normal_enter` is called
|
||||
at the end of function to enter normal mode.
|
||||
3. `normal_enter()` function(normal.c) is a small wrapper for setting
|
||||
up the NormalState structure and calling `state_enter`.
|
||||
4. `normal_check()` function(normal.c) is called before each iteration of
|
||||
normal mode.
|
||||
5. `normal_execute()` function(normal.c) is called when a key is read in normal
|
||||
mode.
|
||||
|
||||
The basic structure described for normal mode in 3, 4 and 5 is used for other
|
||||
modes managed by the `state_enter` loop:
|
||||
|
||||
- command-line mode: `command_line_{enter,check,execute}()`(`ex_getln.c`)
|
||||
- insert mode: `insert_{enter,check,execute}()`(`edit.c`)
|
||||
- terminal mode: `terminal_{enter,execute}()`(`terminal.c`)
|
||||
|
||||
### Async event support
|
||||
|
||||
One of the features Neovim added is the support for handling arbitrary
|
||||
asynchronous events, which can include:
|
||||
|
||||
- msgpack-rpc requests
|
||||
- job control callbacks
|
||||
- timers(not implemented yet but the support code is already there)
|
||||
|
||||
Neovim implements this functionality by entering another event loop while
|
||||
waiting for characters, so instead of:
|
||||
|
||||
```py
|
||||
def state_enter(state_callback, data):
|
||||
do
|
||||
key = readkey() # read a key from the user
|
||||
while state_callback(data, key) # invoke the callback for the current state
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Neovim program loop is more like:
|
||||
|
||||
```py
|
||||
def state_enter(state_callback, data):
|
||||
do
|
||||
event = read_next_event() # read an event from the operating system
|
||||
while state_callback(data, event) # invoke the callback for the current state
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
where `event` is something the operating system delivers to us, including(but
|
||||
not limited to) user input. The `read_next_event()` part is internally
|
||||
implemented by libuv, the platform layer used by Neovim.
|
||||
|
||||
Since Neovim inherited its code from Vim, the states are not prepared to receive
|
||||
"arbitrary events", so we use a special key to represent those(When a state
|
||||
receives an "arbitrary event", it normally doesn't do anything other update the
|
||||
screen).
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user