vim-patch:8.2.4688: new regexp engine does not give an error for "\%v"

Problem:    New regexp engine does not give an error for "\%v".
Solution:   Check for a value argument. (issue vim/vim#10079)

91ff3d4f52

Co-authored-by: Bram Moolenaar <Bram@vim.org>
This commit is contained in:
zeertzjq 2022-11-05 15:51:26 +08:00
parent 45a3e7f669
commit 78e69412ac
4 changed files with 33 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@ -97,20 +97,22 @@ static int toggle_Magic(int x)
#define MAX_LIMIT (32767L << 16L)
static char_u e_missingbracket[] = N_("E769: Missing ] after %s[");
static char_u e_reverse_range[] = N_("E944: Reverse range in character class");
static char_u e_large_class[] = N_("E945: Range too large in character class");
static char_u e_unmatchedpp[] = N_("E53: Unmatched %s%%(");
static char_u e_unmatchedp[] = N_("E54: Unmatched %s(");
static char_u e_unmatchedpar[] = N_("E55: Unmatched %s)");
static char_u e_z_not_allowed[] = N_("E66: \\z( not allowed here");
static char_u e_z1_not_allowed[] = N_("E67: \\z1 - \\z9 not allowed here");
static char_u e_missing_sb[] = N_("E69: Missing ] after %s%%[");
static char_u e_empty_sb[] = N_("E70: Empty %s%%[]");
static char_u e_recursive[] = N_("E956: Cannot use pattern recursively");
static char_u e_regexp_number_after_dot_pos_search[]
static char e_missingbracket[] = N_("E769: Missing ] after %s[");
static char e_reverse_range[] = N_("E944: Reverse range in character class");
static char e_large_class[] = N_("E945: Range too large in character class");
static char e_unmatchedpp[] = N_("E53: Unmatched %s%%(");
static char e_unmatchedp[] = N_("E54: Unmatched %s(");
static char e_unmatchedpar[] = N_("E55: Unmatched %s)");
static char e_z_not_allowed[] = N_("E66: \\z( not allowed here");
static char e_z1_not_allowed[] = N_("E67: \\z1 - \\z9 not allowed here");
static char e_missing_sb[] = N_("E69: Missing ] after %s%%[");
static char e_empty_sb[] = N_("E70: Empty %s%%[]");
static char e_recursive[] = N_("E956: Cannot use pattern recursively");
static char e_regexp_number_after_dot_pos_search_chr[]
= N_("E1204: No Number allowed after .: '\\%%%c'");
static char_u e_substitute_nesting_too_deep[] = N_("E1290: substitute nesting too deep");
static char e_nfa_regexp_missing_value_in_chr[]
= N_("E1273: (NFA regexp) missing value in '\\%%%c'");
static char e_substitute_nesting_too_deep[] = N_("E1290: substitute nesting too deep");
#define NOT_MULTI 0
#define MULTI_ONE 1

View File

@ -2117,7 +2117,7 @@ static char_u *regatom(int *flagp)
break;
} else if (c == 'l' || c == 'c' || c == 'v') {
if (cur && n) {
semsg(_(e_regexp_number_after_dot_pos_search), no_Magic(c));
semsg(_(e_regexp_number_after_dot_pos_search_chr), no_Magic(c));
rc_did_emsg = true;
return NULL;
}

View File

@ -2151,7 +2151,7 @@ static int nfa_regatom(void)
}
while (ascii_isdigit(c)) {
if (cur) {
semsg(_(e_regexp_number_after_dot_pos_search), no_Magic(c));
semsg(_(e_regexp_number_after_dot_pos_search_chr), no_Magic(c));
return FAIL;
}
if (n > (INT32_MAX - (c - '0')) / 10) {
@ -2165,6 +2165,10 @@ static int nfa_regatom(void)
if (c == 'l' || c == 'c' || c == 'v') {
int32_t limit = INT32_MAX;
if (!cur && n == 0) {
semsg(_(e_nfa_regexp_missing_value_in_chr), no_Magic(c));
return FAIL;
}
if (c == 'l') {
if (cur) {
n = curwin->w_cursor.lnum;

View File

@ -105,6 +105,18 @@ func Test_multi_failure()
set re=0
endfunc
func Test_column_failure()
set re=1
call assert_fails('/\%v', 'E71:')
call assert_fails('/\%c', 'E71:')
call assert_fails('/\%l', 'E71:')
set re=2
call assert_fails('/\%v', 'E1273:')
call assert_fails('/\%c', 'E1273:')
call assert_fails('/\%l', 'E1273:')
set re=0
endfunc
func Test_recursive_addstate()
throw 'skipped: TODO: '
" This will call addstate() recursively until it runs into the limit.