vim-patch:7.4.818

Problem:    'linebreak' breaks c% if the last Visual selection was block.
            (Chris Morganiser, Issue 389)
Solution:   Handle Visual block mode differently. (Christian Brabandt)

89c17c02ca

src/nvim/normal.c

@@ -7782,7 +7782,7 @@ static void nv_open(cmdarg_T *cap)
     n_opencmd(cap);
 }
 
-// calculate start/end virtual columns for operating in block mode
+// Calculate start/end virtual columns for operating in block mode.
 static void get_op_vcol(
     oparg_T *oap,
     colnr_T redo_VIsual_vcol,
@@ -7792,11 +7792,14 @@ static void get_op_vcol(
   colnr_T start;
   colnr_T end;
 
-  if (VIsual_mode != Ctrl_V) {
+  if (VIsual_mode != Ctrl_V
+      || (!initial && oap->end.col < curwin->w_width)) {
     return;
   }
 
+  if (VIsual_active) {
     oap->motion_type = MBLOCK;
+  }
 
   // prevent from moving onto a trail byte
   if (has_mbyte) {

src/nvim/testdir/test_listlbr.in

@@ -81,6 +81,13 @@ Go
 aaa
 aaa
 a2k2j~e.
+:let g:test ="Test 10: using normal commands after block-visual"
+:$put =g:test
+:set linebreak
+Go
+abcd{ef
+ghijklm
+no}pqrs2k0f{c%
 :%w! test.out
 :qa!
 ENDTEST

src/nvim/testdir/test_listlbr.ok

@@ -46,3 +46,6 @@ Test 9: using redo after block visual mode
 AaA
 AaA
 A
+Test 10: using normal commands after block-visual
+
+abcdpqrs

src/nvim/version.c

@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@ static int included_patches[] = {
   // 821,
   820,
   // 819,
-  // 818,
+  818,
   817,
   816,
   815,