mirror of
https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
synced 2024-12-20 11:15:14 -07:00
vim-patch:8.1.1705: using ~{} for a literal dict is not nice
Problem: Using ~{} for a literal dict is not nice.
Solution: Use #{} instead.
4c6d90458b
This commit is contained in:
parent
20fc7ef161
commit
4a6e201e37
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Dictionary An associative, unordered array: Each entry has a key and a
|
||||
value. |Dictionary|
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
{'blue': "#0000ff", 'red': "#ff0000"}
|
||||
~{blue: "#0000ff", red: "#ff0000"}
|
||||
#{blue: "#0000ff", red: "#ff0000"}
|
||||
|
||||
The Number and String types are converted automatically, depending on how they
|
||||
are used.
|
||||
@ -441,11 +441,11 @@ entry. Note that the String '04' and the Number 04 are different, since the
|
||||
Number will be converted to the String '4'. The empty string can also be used
|
||||
as a key.
|
||||
*literal-Dict*
|
||||
To avoid having to put quotes around every key the ~{} form can be used. This
|
||||
To avoid having to put quotes around every key the #{} form can be used. This
|
||||
does require the key to consist only of ASCII letters, digits, '-' and '_'.
|
||||
Example: >
|
||||
let mydict = ~{zero: 0, one_key: 1, two-key: 2, 333: 3}
|
||||
Note that 333 here is the string "333". Empty keys are not possible here.
|
||||
let mydict = #{zero: 0, one_key: 1, two-key: 2, 333: 3}
|
||||
Note that 333 here is the string "333". Empty keys are not possible with #{}.
|
||||
|
||||
A value can be any expression. Using a Dictionary for a value creates a
|
||||
nested Dictionary: >
|
||||
|
@ -3906,7 +3906,7 @@ static int eval6(char_u **arg, typval_T *rettv, int evaluate, int want_string)
|
||||
// (expression) nested expression
|
||||
// [expr, expr] List
|
||||
// {key: val, key: val} Dictionary
|
||||
// ~{key: val, key: val} Dictionary with literal keys
|
||||
// #{key: val, key: val} Dictionary with literal keys
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Also handle:
|
||||
// ! in front logical NOT
|
||||
@ -4014,8 +4014,8 @@ static int eval7(
|
||||
case '[': ret = get_list_tv(arg, rettv, evaluate);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
// Dictionary: ~{key: val, key: val}
|
||||
case '~':
|
||||
// Dictionary: #{key: val, key: val}
|
||||
case '#':
|
||||
if ((*arg)[1] == '{') {
|
||||
(*arg)++;
|
||||
ret = dict_get_tv(arg, rettv, evaluate, true);
|
||||
|
@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ func Test_dict_func_remove_in_use()
|
||||
endfunc
|
||||
|
||||
func Test_dict_literal_keys()
|
||||
call assert_equal({'one': 1, 'two2': 2, '3three': 3, '44': 4}, ~{one: 1, two2: 2, 3three: 3, 44: 4},)
|
||||
call assert_equal({'one': 1, 'two2': 2, '3three': 3, '44': 4}, #{one: 1, two2: 2, 3three: 3, 44: 4},)
|
||||
|
||||
" why *{} cannot be used
|
||||
let blue = 'blue'
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user