vim-patch:8.1.1705: using ~{} for a literal dict is not nice

Problem:    Using ~{} for a literal dict is not nice.
Solution:   Use #{} instead.
4c6d90458b
This commit is contained in:
Jan Edmund Lazo 2020-10-07 01:00:11 -04:00
parent 20fc7ef161
commit 4a6e201e37
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 64915E6E9F735B15
3 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Dictionary An associative, unordered array: Each entry has a key and a
value. |Dictionary|
Examples:
{'blue': "#0000ff", 'red': "#ff0000"}
~{blue: "#0000ff", red: "#ff0000"}
#{blue: "#0000ff", red: "#ff0000"}
The Number and String types are converted automatically, depending on how they
are used.
@ -441,11 +441,11 @@ entry. Note that the String '04' and the Number 04 are different, since the
Number will be converted to the String '4'. The empty string can also be used
as a key.
*literal-Dict*
To avoid having to put quotes around every key the ~{} form can be used. This
To avoid having to put quotes around every key the #{} form can be used. This
does require the key to consist only of ASCII letters, digits, '-' and '_'.
Example: >
let mydict = ~{zero: 0, one_key: 1, two-key: 2, 333: 3}
Note that 333 here is the string "333". Empty keys are not possible here.
let mydict = #{zero: 0, one_key: 1, two-key: 2, 333: 3}
Note that 333 here is the string "333". Empty keys are not possible with #{}.
A value can be any expression. Using a Dictionary for a value creates a
nested Dictionary: >

View File

@ -3906,7 +3906,7 @@ static int eval6(char_u **arg, typval_T *rettv, int evaluate, int want_string)
// (expression) nested expression
// [expr, expr] List
// {key: val, key: val} Dictionary
// ~{key: val, key: val} Dictionary with literal keys
// #{key: val, key: val} Dictionary with literal keys
//
// Also handle:
// ! in front logical NOT
@ -4014,8 +4014,8 @@ static int eval7(
case '[': ret = get_list_tv(arg, rettv, evaluate);
break;
// Dictionary: ~{key: val, key: val}
case '~':
// Dictionary: #{key: val, key: val}
case '#':
if ((*arg)[1] == '{') {
(*arg)++;
ret = dict_get_tv(arg, rettv, evaluate, true);

View File

@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ func Test_dict_func_remove_in_use()
endfunc
func Test_dict_literal_keys()
call assert_equal({'one': 1, 'two2': 2, '3three': 3, '44': 4}, ~{one: 1, two2: 2, 3three: 3, 44: 4},)
call assert_equal({'one': 1, 'two2': 2, '3three': 3, '44': 4}, #{one: 1, two2: 2, 3three: 3, 44: 4},)
" why *{} cannot be used
let blue = 'blue'