mirror of
https://github.com/neovim/neovim.git
synced 2024-12-19 18:55:14 -07:00
vim-patch:9.1.0082: Redrawing can be improved when deleting lines with 'cursorline'
Problem: Redrawing can be improved when deleting lines with 'cursorline'.
Solution: Use smarter invalidation and adjustment. Remove unnecessary
UPD_VALID as it is already set at the top of the loop. Make
the test for vim/vim#4862 fail without the fix.
(zeertzjq)
closes: vim/vim#13986
7ce34c9a94
This commit is contained in:
parent
1f9da3d083
commit
1c2b9e8dd8
@ -353,20 +353,19 @@ static void changed_common(buf_T *buf, linenr_T lnum, colnr_T col, linenr_T lnum
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If lines have been added or removed, relative numbering always
|
||||
// requires a redraw.
|
||||
// requires an update even if cursor didn't move.
|
||||
if (wp->w_p_rnu && xtra != 0) {
|
||||
wp->w_last_cursor_lnum_rnu = 0;
|
||||
redraw_later(wp, UPD_VALID);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Cursor line highlighting probably need to be updated with
|
||||
// "UPD_VALID" if it's below the change.
|
||||
// If the cursor line is inside the change we need to redraw more.
|
||||
if (wp->w_p_cul) {
|
||||
if (xtra == 0) {
|
||||
redraw_later(wp, UPD_VALID);
|
||||
} else if (lnum <= wp->w_last_cursorline) {
|
||||
redraw_later(wp, UPD_SOME_VALID);
|
||||
if (wp->w_p_cul && wp->w_last_cursorline >= lnum) {
|
||||
if (wp->w_last_cursorline < lnume) {
|
||||
// If 'cursorline' was inside the change, it has already
|
||||
// been invalidated in w_lines[] by the loop above.
|
||||
wp->w_last_cursorline = 0;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// If 'cursorline' was below the change, adjust its lnum.
|
||||
wp->w_last_cursorline += xtra;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ func Test_cursorline_after_yank()
|
||||
call writefile([
|
||||
\ 'set cul rnu',
|
||||
\ 'call setline(1, ["","1","2","3",""])',
|
||||
\ ], 'Xtest_cursorline_yank')
|
||||
\ ], 'Xtest_cursorline_yank', 'D')
|
||||
let buf = RunVimInTerminal('-S Xtest_cursorline_yank', {'rows': 8})
|
||||
call TermWait(buf)
|
||||
call term_sendkeys(buf, "Gy3k")
|
||||
@ -552,25 +552,25 @@ func Test_cursorline_after_yank()
|
||||
|
||||
" clean up
|
||||
call StopVimInTerminal(buf)
|
||||
call delete('Xtest_cursorline_yank')
|
||||
endfunc
|
||||
|
||||
" test for issue https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/4862
|
||||
" Test for issue #4862: pasting above 'cursorline' redraws properly.
|
||||
func Test_put_before_cursorline()
|
||||
new
|
||||
only!
|
||||
call setline(1, 'A')
|
||||
call setline(1, ['A', 'B', 'C'])
|
||||
call cursor(2, 1)
|
||||
redraw
|
||||
let std_attr = screenattr(1, 1)
|
||||
let std_attr = screenattr(2, 1)
|
||||
set cursorline
|
||||
redraw
|
||||
let cul_attr = screenattr(1, 1)
|
||||
let cul_attr = screenattr(2, 1)
|
||||
normal yyP
|
||||
redraw
|
||||
" Line 1 has cursor so it should be highlighted with CursorLine.
|
||||
call assert_equal(cul_attr, screenattr(1, 1))
|
||||
" And CursorLine highlighting from the second line should be gone.
|
||||
call assert_equal(std_attr, screenattr(2, 1))
|
||||
" Line 2 has cursor so it should be highlighted with CursorLine.
|
||||
call assert_equal(cul_attr, screenattr(2, 1))
|
||||
" And CursorLine highlighting from line 3 should be gone.
|
||||
call assert_equal(std_attr, screenattr(3, 1))
|
||||
set nocursorline
|
||||
bwipe!
|
||||
endfunc
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user