Eric Paris 50c205f5e5 LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0 ... It isn't needed. If you don't set the type of the data associated with that type it is a pretty obvious programming bug. So why waste the cycles? Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>		2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
..
include	apparmor: move task from common_audit_data to apparmor_audit_data	2012-04-09 12:23:02 -04:00
.gitignore	.gitignore: ignore apparmor/rlim_names.h	2010-10-21 10:12:35 +11:00
apparmorfs.c	AppArmor: export known rlimit names/value mappings in securityfs	2012-02-27 11:38:19 -08:00
audit.c	apparmor: move task from common_audit_data to apparmor_audit_data	2012-04-09 12:23:02 -04:00
capability.c	LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0	2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
context.c	AppArmor: contexts used in attaching policy to system objects	2010-08-02 15:35:12 +10:00
domain.c	apparmor: Fix change_onexec when called from a confined task	2012-03-28 01:00:05 +11:00
file.c	LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0	2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
ipc.c	LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0	2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
Kconfig	apparmor: depends on NET	2010-08-05 07:36:51 -04:00
lib.c	LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0	2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
lsm.c	LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0	2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
Makefile	AppArmor: Fix location of const qualifier on generated string tables	2012-03-19 18:22:46 -07:00
match.c	AppArmor: Update dfa matching routines.	2012-03-14 06:15:24 -07:00
path.c	AppArmor: Move path failure information into aa_get_name and rename	2012-03-14 06:15:25 -07:00
policy_unpack.c	LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0	2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
policy.c	LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0	2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
procattr.c	apparmor: sparse fix: include procattr.h in procattr.c	2011-09-09 16:56:29 -07:00
resource.c	LSM: do not initialize common_audit_data to 0	2012-04-09 12:23:04 -04:00
sid.c	AppArmor: core policy routines	2010-08-02 15:38:37 +10:00