This patch reorganises the sa1111_resume() function in a manner the spinlock
happens after calling the sa1111_wake(). This fixes two bugs:
1) This function called sa1111_wake() which tried to claim the same spinlock
the sa1111_resume() already claimed. This would result in certain deadlock.
Original idea for this part: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2) The function didn't unlock the spinlock in case the chip didn't report
correct ID.
Original idea for this part: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
3defb24761