Matthew Wilcox 64ac24e738 Generic semaphore implementation ... Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and extensibility. Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep warning. Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the unlikely() was unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>		2008-04-17 10:42:34 -04:00
..
asm-offsets.c
comempci.c
dma.c
entry.S
init_task.c
irq.c
m68k_ksyms.c	Generic semaphore implementation	2008-04-17 10:42:34 -04:00
Makefile	Generic semaphore implementation	2008-04-17 10:42:34 -04:00
module.c
process.c
ptrace.c
setup.c	procfs: constify function pointer tables	2008-02-08 09:22:38 -08:00
signal.c
sys_m68k.c
syscalltable.S	m68k{,nommu}: Wire up new timerfd syscalls	2008-03-04 08:04:11 -08:00
time.c	xtime_lock vs update_process_times	2008-02-13 13:29:25 -08:00
traps.c
vmlinux.lds.S