Thomas Gleixner 2ab516575f x86: vdso: Use seqcount instead of seqlock ... The update of the vdso data happens under xtime_lock, so adding a nested lock is pointless. Just use a seqcount to sync the readers. Reviewed-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>		2012-03-15 18:17:58 -07:00
..
vdso32	x86-32, vdso: On system call restart after SYSENTER, use int $0x80	2011-08-23 16:20:10 -07:00
.gitignore
checkundef.sh
Makefile	x86-64: Add --no-undefined to vDSO build	2011-07-13 11:23:09 -07:00
vclock_gettime.c	x86: vdso: Use seqcount instead of seqlock	2012-03-15 18:17:58 -07:00
vdso32-setup.c	mm: arch: rename in_gate_area_no_task to in_gate_area_no_mm	2011-03-23 16:36:55 -04:00
vdso32.S
vdso-layout.lds.S
vdso-note.S
vdso.lds.S	x86-64: Add time to vDSO	2011-05-24 14:51:29 +02:00
vdso.S	x86-64: Pad vDSO to a page boundary	2011-08-04 16:13:34 -07:00
vgetcpu.c	x86-64: Clean up vdso/kernel shared variables	2011-05-24 14:51:28 +02:00
vma.c	Merge branch 'x86-cpu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip	2011-10-28 05:03:12 -07:00