f44cc269a1
We were grabbing the sequence number before unlock incremented it - fix this by moving the increment to seqmutex_lock() (so the seqmutex_relock() failure path skips the mutex_trylock()), and returning the sequence number from unlock(), to make the API simpler and safer. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
46 lines
825 B
C
46 lines
825 B
C
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
|
|
#ifndef _BCACHEFS_SEQMUTEX_H
|
|
#define _BCACHEFS_SEQMUTEX_H
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/mutex.h>
|
|
|
|
struct seqmutex {
|
|
struct mutex lock;
|
|
u32 seq;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
#define seqmutex_init(_lock) mutex_init(&(_lock)->lock)
|
|
|
|
static inline bool seqmutex_trylock(struct seqmutex *lock)
|
|
{
|
|
return mutex_trylock(&lock->lock);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void seqmutex_lock(struct seqmutex *lock)
|
|
{
|
|
mutex_lock(&lock->lock);
|
|
lock->seq++;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline u32 seqmutex_unlock(struct seqmutex *lock)
|
|
{
|
|
u32 seq = lock->seq;
|
|
mutex_unlock(&lock->lock);
|
|
return seq;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline bool seqmutex_relock(struct seqmutex *lock, u32 seq)
|
|
{
|
|
if (lock->seq != seq || !mutex_trylock(&lock->lock))
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (lock->seq != seq) {
|
|
mutex_unlock(&lock->lock);
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif /* _BCACHEFS_SEQMUTEX_H */
|