1
linux/net/x25/x25_facilities.c
Shaun Pereira ebc3f64b86 [X25]: Fast select with no restriction on response
This patch is a follow up to patch 1 regarding "Selective Sub Address
matching with call user data".  It allows use of the Fast-Select-Acceptance
optional user facility for X.25.

This patch just implements fast select with no restriction on response
(NRR).  What this means (according to ITU-T Recomendation 10/96 section
6.16) is that if in an incoming call packet, the relevant facility bits are
set for fast-select-NRR, then the called DTE can issue a direct response to
the incoming packet using a call-accepted packet that contains
call-user-data.  This patch allows such a response.  

The called DTE can also respond with a clear-request packet that contains
call-user-data.  However, this feature is currently not implemented by the
patch.

How is Fast Select Acceptance used?
By default, the system does not allow fast select acceptance (as before).
To enable a response to fast select acceptance,  
After a listen socket in created and bound as follows
	socket(AF_X25, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
	bind(call_soc, (struct sockaddr *)&locl_addr, sizeof(locl_addr));
but before a listen system call is made, the following ioctl should be used.
	ioctl(call_soc,SIOCX25CALLACCPTAPPRV);
Now the listen system call can be made
	listen(call_soc, 4);
After this, an incoming-call packet will be accepted, but no call-accepted 
packet will be sent back until the following system call is made on the socket
that accepts the call
	ioctl(vc_soc,SIOCX25SENDCALLACCPT);
The network (or cisco xot router used for testing here) will allow the 
application server's call-user-data in the call-accepted packet, 
provided the call-request was made with Fast-select NRR.

Signed-off-by: Shaun Pereira <spereira@tusc.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2005-06-22 22:16:17 -07:00

256 lines
6.3 KiB
C

/*
* X.25 Packet Layer release 002
*
* This is ALPHA test software. This code may break your machine,
* randomly fail to work with new releases, misbehave and/or generally
* screw up. It might even work.
*
* This code REQUIRES 2.1.15 or higher
*
* This module:
* This module is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
* as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
* 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* History
* X.25 001 Split from x25_subr.c
* mar/20/00 Daniela Squassoni Disabling/enabling of facilities
* negotiation.
* apr/14/05 Shaun Pereira - Allow fast select with no restriction
* on response.
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <net/sock.h>
#include <net/x25.h>
/*
* Parse a set of facilities into the facilities structure. Unrecognised
* facilities are written to the debug log file.
*/
int x25_parse_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb,
struct x25_facilities *facilities,
unsigned long *vc_fac_mask)
{
unsigned char *p = skb->data;
unsigned int len = *p++;
*vc_fac_mask = 0;
while (len > 0) {
switch (*p & X25_FAC_CLASS_MASK) {
case X25_FAC_CLASS_A:
switch (*p) {
case X25_FAC_REVERSE:
if((p[1] & 0x81) == 0x81) {
facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x81;
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
break;
}
if((p[1] & 0x01) == 0x01) {
facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x01;
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
break;
}
if((p[1] & 0x80) == 0x80) {
facilities->reverse = p[1] & 0x80;
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
break;
}
if(p[1] == 0x00) {
facilities->reverse
= X25_DEFAULT_REVERSE;
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_REVERSE;
break;
}
case X25_FAC_THROUGHPUT:
facilities->throughput = p[1];
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT;
break;
default:
printk(KERN_DEBUG "X.25: unknown facility "
"%02X, value %02X\n",
p[0], p[1]);
break;
}
p += 2;
len -= 2;
break;
case X25_FAC_CLASS_B:
switch (*p) {
case X25_FAC_PACKET_SIZE:
facilities->pacsize_in = p[1];
facilities->pacsize_out = p[2];
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_PACKET_SIZE;
break;
case X25_FAC_WINDOW_SIZE:
facilities->winsize_in = p[1];
facilities->winsize_out = p[2];
*vc_fac_mask |= X25_MASK_WINDOW_SIZE;
break;
default:
printk(KERN_DEBUG "X.25: unknown facility "
"%02X, values %02X, %02X\n",
p[0], p[1], p[2]);
break;
}
p += 3;
len -= 3;
break;
case X25_FAC_CLASS_C:
printk(KERN_DEBUG "X.25: unknown facility %02X, "
"values %02X, %02X, %02X\n",
p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3]);
p += 4;
len -= 4;
break;
case X25_FAC_CLASS_D:
printk(KERN_DEBUG "X.25: unknown facility %02X, "
"length %d, values %02X, %02X, %02X, %02X\n",
p[0], p[1], p[2], p[3], p[4], p[5]);
len -= p[1] + 2;
p += p[1] + 2;
break;
}
}
return p - skb->data;
}
/*
* Create a set of facilities.
*/
int x25_create_facilities(unsigned char *buffer,
struct x25_facilities *facilities,
unsigned long facil_mask)
{
unsigned char *p = buffer + 1;
int len;
if (!facil_mask) {
/*
* Length of the facilities field in call_req or
* call_accept packets
*/
buffer[0] = 0;
len = 1; /* 1 byte for the length field */
return len;
}
if (facilities->reverse && (facil_mask & X25_MASK_REVERSE)) {
*p++ = X25_FAC_REVERSE;
*p++ = facilities->reverse;
}
if (facilities->throughput && (facil_mask & X25_MASK_THROUGHPUT)) {
*p++ = X25_FAC_THROUGHPUT;
*p++ = facilities->throughput;
}
if ((facilities->pacsize_in || facilities->pacsize_out) &&
(facil_mask & X25_MASK_PACKET_SIZE)) {
*p++ = X25_FAC_PACKET_SIZE;
*p++ = facilities->pacsize_in ? : facilities->pacsize_out;
*p++ = facilities->pacsize_out ? : facilities->pacsize_in;
}
if ((facilities->winsize_in || facilities->winsize_out) &&
(facil_mask & X25_MASK_WINDOW_SIZE)) {
*p++ = X25_FAC_WINDOW_SIZE;
*p++ = facilities->winsize_in ? : facilities->winsize_out;
*p++ = facilities->winsize_out ? : facilities->winsize_in;
}
len = p - buffer;
buffer[0] = len - 1;
return len;
}
/*
* Try to reach a compromise on a set of facilities.
*
* The only real problem is with reverse charging.
*/
int x25_negotiate_facilities(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk,
struct x25_facilities *new)
{
struct x25_sock *x25 = x25_sk(sk);
struct x25_facilities *ours = &x25->facilities;
struct x25_facilities theirs;
int len;
memset(&theirs, 0, sizeof(theirs));
memcpy(new, ours, sizeof(*new));
len = x25_parse_facilities(skb, &theirs, &x25->vc_facil_mask);
/*
* They want reverse charging, we won't accept it.
*/
if ((theirs.reverse & 0x01 ) && (ours->reverse & 0x01)) {
SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: rejecting reverse charging request");
return -1;
}
new->reverse = theirs.reverse;
if (theirs.throughput) {
if (theirs.throughput < ours->throughput) {
SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: throughput negotiated down");
new->throughput = theirs.throughput;
}
}
if (theirs.pacsize_in && theirs.pacsize_out) {
if (theirs.pacsize_in < ours->pacsize_in) {
SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: packet size inwards negotiated down");
new->pacsize_in = theirs.pacsize_in;
}
if (theirs.pacsize_out < ours->pacsize_out) {
SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: packet size outwards negotiated down");
new->pacsize_out = theirs.pacsize_out;
}
}
if (theirs.winsize_in && theirs.winsize_out) {
if (theirs.winsize_in < ours->winsize_in) {
SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: window size inwards negotiated down");
new->winsize_in = theirs.winsize_in;
}
if (theirs.winsize_out < ours->winsize_out) {
SOCK_DEBUG(sk, "X.25: window size outwards negotiated down");
new->winsize_out = theirs.winsize_out;
}
}
return len;
}
/*
* Limit values of certain facilities according to the capability of the
* currently attached x25 link.
*/
void x25_limit_facilities(struct x25_facilities *facilities,
struct x25_neigh *nb)
{
if (!nb->extended) {
if (facilities->winsize_in > 7) {
printk(KERN_DEBUG "X.25: incoming winsize limited to 7\n");
facilities->winsize_in = 7;
}
if (facilities->winsize_out > 7) {
facilities->winsize_out = 7;
printk( KERN_DEBUG "X.25: outgoing winsize limited to 7\n");
}
}
}