fa60ce2cb4
The section "19) Editor modelines and other cruft" in Documentation/process/coding-style.rst clearly says, "Do not include any of these in source files." I recently receive a patch to explicitly add a new one. Let's do treewide cleanups, otherwise some people follow the existing code and attempt to upstream their favoriate editor setups. It is even nicer if scripts/checkpatch.pl can check it. If we like to impose coding style in an editor-independent manner, I think editorconfig (patch [1]) is a saner solution. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200703073143.423557-1-danny@kdrag0n.dev/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210324054457.1477489-1-masahiroy@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org> [auxdisplay] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
35 lines
835 B
C
35 lines
835 B
C
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
|
|
/*
|
|
* super.h
|
|
*
|
|
* Function prototypes
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2002, 2004 Oracle. All rights reserved.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#ifndef OCFS2_SUPER_H
|
|
#define OCFS2_SUPER_H
|
|
|
|
__printf(3, 4)
|
|
int __ocfs2_error(struct super_block *sb, const char *function,
|
|
const char *fmt, ...);
|
|
|
|
#define ocfs2_error(sb, fmt, ...) \
|
|
__ocfs2_error(sb, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
|
|
|
|
__printf(3, 4)
|
|
void __ocfs2_abort(struct super_block *sb, const char *function,
|
|
const char *fmt, ...);
|
|
|
|
#define ocfs2_abort(sb, fmt, ...) \
|
|
__ocfs2_abort(sb, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Void signal blockers, because in-kernel sigprocmask() only fails
|
|
* when SIG_* is wrong.
|
|
*/
|
|
void ocfs2_block_signals(sigset_t *oldset);
|
|
void ocfs2_unblock_signals(sigset_t *oldset);
|
|
|
|
#endif /* OCFS2_SUPER_H */
|