7e7eb5ae4e
Most Linux-kernel uses of locking are straightforward, but there are corner-case uses that rely on less well-known aspects of the lock and unlock primitives. This commit therefore adds a locking.txt and litmus tests in Documentation/litmus-tests/locking to explain these corner-case uses. [ paulmck: Apply Andrea Parri feedback for klitmus7. ] [ paulmck: Apply Akira Yokosawa example-consistency feedback. ] Reviewed-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
42 lines
640 B
Plaintext
42 lines
640 B
Plaintext
C RM-fixed
|
|
|
|
(*
|
|
* Result: Never
|
|
*
|
|
* This litmus test demonstrates that the old "roach motel" approach
|
|
* to locking, where code can be freely moved into critical sections,
|
|
* cannot be used in the Linux kernel.
|
|
*)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
int x;
|
|
atomic_t y;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
P0(int *x, atomic_t *y, spinlock_t *lck)
|
|
{
|
|
int r2;
|
|
|
|
spin_lock(lck);
|
|
r2 = atomic_inc_return(y);
|
|
WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
|
|
spin_unlock(lck);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
P1(int *x, atomic_t *y, spinlock_t *lck)
|
|
{
|
|
int r0;
|
|
int r1;
|
|
int r2;
|
|
|
|
r0 = READ_ONCE(*x);
|
|
r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
|
|
spin_lock(lck);
|
|
r2 = atomic_inc_return(y);
|
|
spin_unlock(lck);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
locations [x;0:r2;1:r0;1:r1;1:r2]
|
|
filter (1:r0=0 /\ 1:r1=1)
|
|
exists (1:r2=1)
|