1
Commit Graph

34 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Huang Ying
a530bbc538 memory tiers: use default_dram_perf_ref_source in log message
Commit 3718c02dbd ("acpi, hmat: calculate abstract distance with HMAT")
added a default_dram_perf_ref_source variable that was initialized but
never used.  This causes kmemleak to report the following memory leak:

unreferenced object 0xff11000225a47b60 (size 16):
  comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294761654
  hex dump (first 16 bytes):
    41 43 50 49 20 48 4d 41 54 00 c1 4b 7d b7 75 7c  ACPI HMAT..K}.u|
  backtrace (crc e6d0e7b2):
    [<ffffffff95d5afdb>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x36b/0x440
    [<ffffffff95c276d6>] kstrdup+0x36/0x60
    [<ffffffff95dfabfa>] mt_set_default_dram_perf+0x23a/0x2c0
    [<ffffffff9ad64733>] hmat_init+0x2b3/0x660
    [<ffffffff95203cec>] do_one_initcall+0x11c/0x5c0
    [<ffffffff9ac9cfc4>] do_initcalls+0x1b4/0x1f0
    [<ffffffff9ac9d52e>] kernel_init_freeable+0x4ae/0x520
    [<ffffffff97c789cc>] kernel_init+0x1c/0x150
    [<ffffffff952aecd1>] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x70
    [<ffffffff9520b18a>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

This reminds us that we forget to use the performance data source
information.  So, use the variable in the error log message to help
identify the root cause of inconsistent performance number.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y13mvo0n.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com
Fixes: 3718c02dbd ("acpi, hmat: calculate abstract distance with HMAT")
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reported-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-09-26 14:01:44 -07:00
Linus Torvalds
7856a56541 Many singleton patches - please see the various changelogs for details.
Quite a lot of nilfs2 work this time around.
 
 Notable patch series in this pull request are:
 
 "mul_u64_u64_div_u64: new implementation" by Nicolas Pitre, with
 assistance from Uwe Kleine-König.  Reimplement mul_u64_u64_div_u64() to
 provide (much) more accurate results.  The current implementation was
 causing Uwe some issues in the PWM drivers.
 
 "xz: Updates to license, filters, and compression options" from Lasse
 Collin.  Miscellaneous maintenance and kinor feature work to the xz
 decompressor.
 
 "Fix some GDB command error and add some GDB commands" from Kuan-Ying Lee.
 Fixes and enhancements to the gdb scripts.
 
 "treewide: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros" from Jeff Johnson.
 Adds lots of MODULE_DESCRIPTIONs, thus fixing lots of warnings about this.
 
 "nilfs2: add support for some common ioctls" from Ryusuke Konishi.  Adds
 various commonly-available ioctls to nilfs2.
 
 "This series fixes a number of formatting issues in kernel doc comments"
 from Ryusuke Konishi does that.
 
 "nilfs2: prevent unexpected ENOENT propagation" from Ryusuke Konishi.  Fix
 issues where -ENOENT was being unintentionally and inappropriately
 returned to userspace.
 
 "nilfs2: assorted cleanups" from Huang Xiaojia.
 
 "nilfs2: fix potential issues with empty b-tree nodes" from Ryusuke
 Konishi fixes some issues which can occur on corrupted nilfs2 filesystems.
 
 "scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh: improve error reporting and usability" from
 Luca Ceresoli does those things.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iHUEABYIAB0WIQTTMBEPP41GrTpTJgfdBJ7gKXxAjgUCZu7dpAAKCRDdBJ7gKXxA
 jsPqAPwMDEZyKlfSw7QioEHNHDkmkbP7VYCYR0CbUnppbztwpAD8D37aVbWQ+UzM
 3nnOq3W2Pc2o/20zqi8Upf1mnvUrygQ=
 =/NWE
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2024-09-21-07-52' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Pull non-MM updates from Andrew Morton:
 "Many singleton patches - please see the various changelogs for
  details.

  Quite a lot of nilfs2 work this time around.

  Notable patch series in this pull request are:

   - "mul_u64_u64_div_u64: new implementation" by Nicolas Pitre, with
     assistance from Uwe Kleine-König. Reimplement mul_u64_u64_div_u64()
     to provide (much) more accurate results. The current implementation
     was causing Uwe some issues in the PWM drivers.

   - "xz: Updates to license, filters, and compression options" from
     Lasse Collin. Miscellaneous maintenance and kinor feature work to
     the xz decompressor.

   - "Fix some GDB command error and add some GDB commands" from
     Kuan-Ying Lee. Fixes and enhancements to the gdb scripts.

   - "treewide: add missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() macros" from Jeff
     Johnson. Adds lots of MODULE_DESCRIPTIONs, thus fixing lots of
     warnings about this.

   - "nilfs2: add support for some common ioctls" from Ryusuke Konishi.
     Adds various commonly-available ioctls to nilfs2.

   - "This series fixes a number of formatting issues in kernel doc
     comments" from Ryusuke Konishi does that.

   - "nilfs2: prevent unexpected ENOENT propagation" from Ryusuke
     Konishi. Fix issues where -ENOENT was being unintentionally and
     inappropriately returned to userspace.

   - "nilfs2: assorted cleanups" from Huang Xiaojia.

   - "nilfs2: fix potential issues with empty b-tree nodes" from Ryusuke
     Konishi fixes some issues which can occur on corrupted nilfs2
     filesystems.

   - "scripts/decode_stacktrace.sh: improve error reporting and
     usability" from Luca Ceresoli does those things"

* tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2024-09-21-07-52' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: (103 commits)
  list: test: increase coverage of list_test_list_replace*()
  list: test: fix tests for list_cut_position()
  proc: use __auto_type more
  treewide: correct the typo 'retun'
  ocfs2: cleanup return value and mlog in ocfs2_global_read_info()
  nilfs2: remove duplicate 'unlikely()' usage
  nilfs2: fix potential oob read in nilfs_btree_check_delete()
  nilfs2: determine empty node blocks as corrupted
  nilfs2: fix potential null-ptr-deref in nilfs_btree_insert()
  user_namespace: use kmemdup_array() instead of kmemdup() for multiple allocation
  tools/mm: rm thp_swap_allocator_test when make clean
  squashfs: fix percpu address space issues in decompressor_multi_percpu.c
  lib: glob.c: added null check for character class
  nilfs2: refactor nilfs_segctor_thread()
  nilfs2: use kthread_create and kthread_stop for the log writer thread
  nilfs2: remove sc_timer_task
  nilfs2: do not repair reserved inode bitmap in nilfs_new_inode()
  nilfs2: eliminate the shared counter and spinlock for i_generation
  nilfs2: separate inode type information from i_state field
  nilfs2: use the BITS_PER_LONG macro
  ...
2024-09-21 08:20:50 -07:00
Yanfei Xu
073c78edf5 memory tier: fix deadlock warning while onlining pages
commit 823430c8e9 ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of
memory tiers") introduces a locking change that use guard(mutex) to
instead of mutex_lock/unlock() for memory_tier_lock.  It unexpectedly
expanded the locked region to include the hotplug_memory_notifier(), as a
result, it triggers an locking dependency detected of ABBA deadlock. 
Exclude hotplug_memory_notifier() from the locked region to fixing it.

The deadlock scenario is that when a memory online event occurs, the
execution of memory notifier will access the read lock of the
memory_chain.rwsem, then the reigistration of the memory notifier in
memory_tier_init() acquires the write lock of the memory_chain.rwsem while
holding memory_tier_lock.  Then the memory online event continues to
invoke the memory hotplug callback registered by memory_tier_init(). 
Since this callback tries to acquire the memory_tier_lock, a deadlock
occurs.

In fact, this deadlock can't happen because memory_tier_init() always
executes before memory online events happen due to the subsys_initcall()
has an higher priority than module_init().

[  133.491106] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[  133.493656] 6.11.0-rc2+ #146 Tainted: G           O     N
[  133.504290] ------------------------------------------------------
[  133.515194] (udev-worker)/1133 is trying to acquire lock:
[  133.525715] ffffffff87044e28 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0
[  133.536449]
[  133.536449] but task is already holding lock:
[  133.549847] ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0
[  133.556781]
[  133.556781] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[  133.556781]
[  133.569957]
[  133.569957] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  133.577618]
[  133.577618] -> #1 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}:
[  133.584997]        down_write+0x97/0x210
[  133.588647]        blocking_notifier_chain_register+0x71/0xd0
[  133.592537]        register_memory_notifier+0x26/0x30
[  133.596314]        memory_tier_init+0x187/0x300
[  133.599864]        do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0
[  133.603399]        kernel_init_freeable+0xab0/0xeb0
[  133.606986]        kernel_init+0x28/0x2f0
[  133.610312]        ret_from_fork+0x59/0x90
[  133.613652]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  133.617012]
[  133.617012] -> #0 (memory_tier_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  133.623390]        __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60
[  133.626730]        lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580
[  133.629757]        __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490
[  133.632731]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
[  133.635717]        memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0
[  133.638748]        notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370
[  133.641647]        blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0
[  133.644636]        memory_notify+0x2e/0x40
[  133.647427]        online_pages+0x597/0x720
[  133.650246]        memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0
[  133.653107]        device_online+0x141/0x1d0
[  133.655831]        online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60
[  133.658616]        walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120
[  133.661419]        add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0
[  133.664202]        add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180
[  133.667060]        dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem]
[  133.669949]        dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230
[  133.672687]        really_probe+0x27f/0xac0
[  133.675463]        __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460
[  133.678493]        driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0
[  133.681366]        __driver_attach+0x277/0x570
[  133.684149]        bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0
[  133.686937]        driver_attach+0x49/0x60
[  133.689673]        bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0
[  133.692421]        driver_register+0x170/0x4b0
[  133.695118]        __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0
[  133.697910]        dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem]
[  133.700794]        do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0
[  133.703455]        do_init_module+0x277/0x750
[  133.706054]        load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0
[  133.708602]        init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0
[  133.711234]        idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690
[  133.713937]        __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0
[  133.716492]        x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0
[  133.719053]        do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
[  133.721537]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[  133.724239]
[  133.724239] other info that might help us debug this:
[  133.724239]
[  133.730832]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  133.730832]
[  133.735298]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  133.737759]        ----                    ----
[  133.740165]   rlock((memory_chain).rwsem);
[  133.742623]                                lock(memory_tier_lock);
[  133.745357]                                lock((memory_chain).rwsem);
[  133.748141]   lock(memory_tier_lock);
[  133.750489]
[  133.750489]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  133.750489]
[  133.756742] 6 locks held by (udev-worker)/1133:
[  133.759179]  #0: ffff888207be6158 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: __driver_attach+0x26c/0x570
[  133.762299]  #1: ffffffff875b5868 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_device_hotplug+0x20/0x30
[  133.765565]  #2: ffff88820cf6a108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_online+0x2f/0x1d0
[  133.768978]  #3: ffffffff86d08ff0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x17/0x30
[  133.772312]  #4: ffffffff8702dfb0 (mem_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: mem_hotplug_begin+0x23/0x30
[  133.775544]  #5: ffffffff875d3310 ((memory_chain).rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x60/0xb0
[  133.779113]
[  133.779113] stack backtrace:
[  133.783728] CPU: 5 UID: 0 PID: 1133 Comm: (udev-worker) Tainted: G           O     N 6.11.0-rc2+ #146
[  133.787220] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [N]=TEST
[  133.789948] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
[  133.793291] Call Trace:
[  133.795826]  <TASK>
[  133.798284]  dump_stack_lvl+0xea/0x150
[  133.801025]  dump_stack+0x19/0x20
[  133.803609]  print_circular_bug+0x477/0x740
[  133.806341]  check_noncircular+0x2f4/0x3e0
[  133.809056]  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
[  133.811866]  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
[  133.814670]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30
[  133.817610]  __lock_acquire+0x2efd/0x5c60
[  133.820339]  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
[  133.823128]  ? __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0
[  133.825926]  ? do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0
[  133.828648]  lock_acquire+0x1ce/0x580
[  133.831349]  ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0
[  133.834293]  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
[  133.837134]  __mutex_lock+0x15c/0x1490
[  133.839829]  ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0
[  133.842753]  ? memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0
[  133.845602]  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30
[  133.848438]  ? __pfx___mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
[  133.851200]  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
[  133.853935]  ? global_dirty_limits+0xc0/0x160
[  133.856699]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x58/0xa0
[  133.859564]  mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
[  133.862251]  ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
[  133.864964]  memtier_hotplug_callback+0x383/0x4b0
[  133.867752]  notifier_call_chain+0xbf/0x370
[  133.870550]  ? writeback_set_ratelimit+0xe8/0x160
[  133.873372]  blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x76/0xb0
[  133.876311]  memory_notify+0x2e/0x40
[  133.879013]  online_pages+0x597/0x720
[  133.881686]  ? irqentry_exit+0x3e/0xa0
[  133.884397]  ? __pfx_online_pages+0x10/0x10
[  133.887244]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30
[  133.890299]  ? mhp_init_memmap_on_memory+0x7a/0x1c0
[  133.893203]  memory_subsys_online+0x4f6/0x7f0
[  133.896099]  ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10
[  133.899039]  ? xa_load+0x16d/0x2e0
[  133.901667]  ? __pfx_xa_load+0x10/0x10
[  133.904366]  ? __pfx_memory_subsys_online+0x10/0x10
[  133.907218]  device_online+0x141/0x1d0
[  133.909845]  online_memory_block+0x4d/0x60
[  133.912494]  walk_memory_blocks+0xc0/0x120
[  133.915104]  ? __pfx_online_memory_block+0x10/0x10
[  133.917776]  add_memory_resource+0x51d/0x6c0
[  133.920404]  ? __pfx_add_memory_resource+0x10/0x10
[  133.923104]  ? _raw_write_unlock+0x31/0x60
[  133.925781]  ? register_memory_resource+0x119/0x180
[  133.928450]  add_memory_driver_managed+0xf5/0x180
[  133.931036]  dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x7f7/0xb40 [kmem]
[  133.933665]  ? __pfx_dev_dax_kmem_probe+0x10/0x10 [kmem]
[  133.936332]  ? __pfx___up_read+0x10/0x10
[  133.938878]  dax_bus_probe+0x147/0x230
[  133.941332]  ? __pfx_dax_bus_probe+0x10/0x10
[  133.943954]  really_probe+0x27f/0xac0
[  133.946387]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp1+0x1e/0x30
[  133.949106]  __driver_probe_device+0x1f3/0x460
[  133.951704]  ? parse_option_str+0x149/0x190
[  133.954241]  driver_probe_device+0x56/0x1b0
[  133.956749]  __driver_attach+0x277/0x570
[  133.959228]  ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10
[  133.961776]  bus_for_each_dev+0x145/0x1e0
[  133.964367]  ? __pfx_bus_for_each_dev+0x10/0x10
[  133.967019]  ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20
[  133.969543]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x31/0x60
[  133.972132]  driver_attach+0x49/0x60
[  133.974536]  bus_add_driver+0x2f3/0x6b0
[  133.977044]  driver_register+0x170/0x4b0
[  133.979480]  __dax_driver_register+0x141/0x1b0
[  133.982126]  ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem]
[  133.984724]  dax_kmem_init+0x54/0xff0 [kmem]
[  133.987284]  ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem]
[  133.989965]  do_one_initcall+0x117/0x5d0
[  133.992506]  ? __pfx_do_one_initcall+0x10/0x10
[  133.995185]  ? __kasan_kmalloc+0x88/0xa0
[  133.997748]  ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60
[  134.000288]  ? kasan_unpoison+0x2c/0x60
[  134.002762]  ? kasan_poison+0x3e/0x60
[  134.005202]  ? __asan_register_globals+0x62/0x80
[  134.007753]  ? __pfx_dax_kmem_init+0x10/0x10 [kmem]
[  134.010439]  do_init_module+0x277/0x750
[  134.012953]  load_module+0x5d1d/0x74f0
[  134.015406]  ? __pfx_load_module+0x10/0x10
[  134.017887]  ? __pfx_ima_post_read_file+0x10/0x10
[  134.020470]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp8+0x1c/0x30
[  134.023127]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20
[  134.025767]  ? security_kernel_post_read_file+0xa2/0xd0
[  134.028429]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20
[  134.031162]  ? kernel_read_file+0x503/0x820
[  134.033645]  ? __pfx_kernel_read_file+0x10/0x10
[  134.036232]  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
[  134.038766]  init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0
[  134.041291]  ? init_module_from_file+0x12c/0x1a0
[  134.043936]  ? __pfx_init_module_from_file+0x10/0x10
[  134.046516]  ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x21/0x30
[  134.049091]  ? __kasan_check_read+0x15/0x20
[  134.051551]  ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x60/0x210
[  134.054077]  idempotent_init_module+0x3f1/0x690
[  134.056643]  ? __pfx_idempotent_init_module+0x10/0x10
[  134.059318]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_const_cmp4+0x1a/0x20
[  134.061995]  ? __fget_light+0x17d/0x210
[  134.064428]  __x64_sys_finit_module+0x10e/0x1a0
[  134.066976]  x64_sys_call+0x184d/0x20d0
[  134.069405]  do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
[  134.071926]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

[yanfei.xu@intel.com: add mutex_lock/unlock() pair back]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240830102447.1445296-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827113614.1343049-1-yanfei.xu@intel.com
Fixes: 823430c8e9 ("memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers")
Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horen.chuang@linux.dev>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-09-03 21:15:56 -07:00
Hongbo Li
01b58b1763 mm: make use of str_true_false helper
The helper str_true_false() was introduced to return "true/false" string
literal.  We can simplify this format by str_true_false.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240827024517.914100-3-lihongbo22@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <lihongbo22@huawei.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-09-01 20:43:42 -07:00
Zi Yan
2a28713a67 memory tiering: introduce folio_use_access_time() check
If memory tiering mode is on and a folio is not in the top tier memory,
folio's cpupid field is repurposed to store page access time.  Instead of
an open coded check, use a function to encapsulate the check.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240724130115.793641-3-ziy@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-09-01 20:25:47 -07:00
Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang
823430c8e9 memory tier: consolidate the initialization of memory tiers
The current memory tier initialization process is distributed across two
different functions, memory_tier_init() and memory_tier_late_init().  This
design is hard to maintain.  Thus, this patch is proposed to reduce the
possible code paths by consolidating different initialization patches into
one.

The earlier discussion with Jonathan and Ying is listed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240405150244.00004b49@Huawei.com/

If we want to put these two initializations together, they must be placed
together in the later function.  Because only at that time, the HMAT
information will be ready, adist between nodes can be calculated, and
memory tiering can be established based on the adist.  So we position the
initialization at memory_tier_init() to the memory_tier_late_init() call. 
Moreover, it's natural to keep memory_tier initialization in drivers at
device_initcall() level.

If we simply move the set_node_memory_tier() from memory_tier_init() to
late_initcall(), it will result in HMAT not registering the
mt_adistance_algorithm callback function, because set_node_memory_tier()
is not performed during the memory tiering initialization phase, leading
to a lack of correct default_dram information.

Therefore, we introduced a nodemask to pass the information of the default
DRAM nodes.  The reason for not choosing to reuse default_dram_type->nodes
is that it is not clean enough.  So in the end, we use a __initdata
variable, which is a variable that is released once initialization is
complete, including both CPU and memory nodes for HMAT to iterate through.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240704072646.437579-1-horen.chuang@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horenchuang@bytedance.com>
Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Ravi Jonnalagadda <ravis.opensrc@micron.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-07-12 15:52:20 -07:00
Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang
cf93be18fa memory tier: create CPUless memory tiers after obtaining HMAT info
The current implementation treats emulated memory devices, such as CXL1.1
type3 memory, as normal DRAM when they are emulated as normal memory
(E820_TYPE_RAM).  However, these emulated devices have different
characteristics than traditional DRAM, making it important to distinguish
them.  Thus, we modify the tiered memory initialization process to
introduce a delay specifically for CPUless NUMA nodes.  This delay ensures
that the memory tier initialization for these nodes is deferred until HMAT
information is obtained during the boot process.  Finally, demotion tables
are recalculated at the end.

* late_initcall(memory_tier_late_init);
  Some device drivers may have initialized memory tiers between
  `memory_tier_init()` and `memory_tier_late_init()`, potentially bringing
  online memory nodes and configuring memory tiers.  They should be
  excluded in the late init.

* Handle cases where there is no HMAT when creating memory tiers
  There is a scenario where a CPUless node does not provide HMAT
  information.  If no HMAT is specified, it falls back to using the
  default DRAM tier.

* Introduce another new lock `default_dram_perf_lock` for adist
  calculation In the current implementation, iterating through CPUlist
  nodes requires holding the `memory_tier_lock`.  However,
  `mt_calc_adistance()` will end up trying to acquire the same lock,
  leading to a potential deadlock.  Therefore, we propose introducing a
  standalone `default_dram_perf_lock` to protect `default_dram_perf_*`. 
  This approach not only avoids deadlock but also prevents holding a large
  lock simultaneously.

* Upgrade `set_node_memory_tier` to support additional cases, including
  default DRAM, late CPUless, and hot-plugged initializations.  To cover
  hot-plugged memory nodes, `mt_calc_adistance()` and
  `mt_find_alloc_memory_type()` are moved into `set_node_memory_tier()` to
  handle cases where memtype is not initialized and where HMAT information
  is available.

* Introduce `default_memory_types` for those memory types that are not
  initialized by device drivers.  Because late initialized memory and
  default DRAM memory need to be managed, a default memory type is created
  for storing all memory types that are not initialized by device drivers
  and as a fallback.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240405000707.2670063-3-horenchuang@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horenchuang@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Ravi Jonnalagadda <ravis.opensrc@micron.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawie.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-05-05 17:53:26 -07:00
Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang
a72a30af55 memory tier: dax/kmem: introduce an abstract layer for finding, allocating, and putting memory types
Patch series "Improved Memory Tier Creation for CPUless NUMA Nodes", v11.

When a memory device, such as CXL1.1 type3 memory, is emulated as normal
memory (E820_TYPE_RAM), the memory device is indistinguishable from normal
DRAM in terms of memory tiering with the current implementation.  The
current memory tiering assigns all detected normal memory nodes to the
same DRAM tier.  This results in normal memory devices with different
attributions being unable to be assigned to the correct memory tier,
leading to the inability to migrate pages between different types of
memory. 
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/PH0PR08MB7955E9F08CCB64F23963B5C3A860A@PH0PR08MB7955.namprd08.prod.outlook.com/T/

This patchset automatically resolves the issues.  It delays the
initialization of memory tiers for CPUless NUMA nodes until they obtain
HMAT information and after all devices are initialized at boot time,
eliminating the need for user intervention.  If no HMAT is specified, it
falls back to using `default_dram_type`.

Example usecase:
We have CXL memory on the host, and we create VMs with a new system memory
device backed by host CXL memory.  We inject CXL memory performance
attributes through QEMU, and the guest now sees memory nodes with
performance attributes in HMAT.  With this change, we enable the guest
kernel to construct the correct memory tiering for the memory nodes.


This patch (of 2):

Since different memory devices require finding, allocating, and putting
memory types, these common steps are abstracted in this patch, enhancing
the scalability and conciseness of the code.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240405000707.2670063-1-horenchuang@bytedance.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240405000707.2670063-2-horenchuang@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Ho-Ren (Jack) Chuang <horenchuang@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawie.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@gmail.com>
Cc: Hao Xiang <hao.xiang@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Ravi Jonnalagadda <ravis.opensrc@micron.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-05-05 17:53:25 -07:00
Li Zhijian
601e793a74 mm/demotion: print demotion targets
Currently, when a demotion occurs, it will prioritize selecting a node
from the preferred targets as the destination node for the demotion.  If
the preferred node does not meet the requirements, it will try from all
the lower memory tier nodes until it finds a suitable demotion destination
node or ultimately fails.

However, the demotion target information isn't exposed to the users,
especially the preferred target information, which relies on more factors.
This makes it hard for users to understand the exact demotion behavior.

Rather than having a new sysfs interface to expose this information,
printing directly to kernel messages, just like the current page
allocation fallback order does.

A dmesg example with this patch is as follows:
[    0.704860] Demotion targets for Node 0: null
[    0.705456] Demotion targets for Node 1: null
// node 2 is onlined
[   32.259775] Demotion targets for Node 0: perferred: 2, fallback: 2
[   32.261290] Demotion targets for Node 1: perferred: 2, fallback: 2
[   32.262726] Demotion targets for Node 2: null
// node 3 is onlined
[   42.448809] Demotion targets for Node 0: perferred: 2, fallback: 2-3
[   42.450704] Demotion targets for Node 1: perferred: 2, fallback: 2-3
[   42.452556] Demotion targets for Node 2: perferred: 3, fallback: 3
[   42.454136] Demotion targets for Node 3: null
// node 4 is onlined
[   52.676833] Demotion targets for Node 0: perferred: 2, fallback: 2-4
[   52.678735] Demotion targets for Node 1: perferred: 2, fallback: 2-4
[   52.680493] Demotion targets for Node 2: perferred: 4, fallback: 3-4
[   52.682154] Demotion targets for Node 3: null
[   52.683405] Demotion targets for Node 4: null
// node 5 is onlined
[   62.931902] Demotion targets for Node 0: perferred: 2, fallback: 2-5
[   62.938266] Demotion targets for Node 1: perferred: 5, fallback: 2-5
[   62.943515] Demotion targets for Node 2: perferred: 4, fallback: 3-4
[   62.947471] Demotion targets for Node 3: null
[   62.949908] Demotion targets for Node 4: null
[   62.952137] Demotion targets for Node 5: perferred: 3, fallback: 3-4

Regarding this requirement, we have previously discussed [1].  The initial
proposal involved introducing a new sysfs interface.  However, due to
concerns about potential changes and compatibility issues with the
interface in the future, a consensus was not reached with the community. 
Therefore, this time, we are directly printing out the information.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/d1d5add8-8f4a-4578-8bf0-2cbe79b09989@fujitsu.com/

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240206020151.605516-1-lizhijian@fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-02-22 10:24:55 -08:00
Ricardo B. Marliere
e374ae2be2 memory tier: make memory_tier_subsys const
Now that the driver core can properly handle constant struct bus_type,
move the memory_tier_subsys variable to be a constant structure as well,
placing it into read-only memory which can not be modified at runtime.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240204-bus_cleanup-mm-v1-1-00f49286f164@marliere.net
Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marliere <ricardo@marliere.net>
Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-02-22 10:24:54 -08:00
Dave Jiang
6a954e94d0 base/node / acpi: Change 'node_hmem_attrs' to 'access_coordinates'
Dan Williams suggested changing the struct 'node_hmem_attrs' to
'access_coordinates' [1]. The struct is a container of r/w-latency and
r/w-bandwidth numbers. Moving forward, this container will also be used by
CXL to store the performance characteristics of each link hop in
the PCIE/CXL topology. So, where node_hmem_attrs is just the access
parameters of a memory-node, access_coordinates applies more broadly
to hardware topology characteristics. The observation is that seemed like
an exercise in having the application identify "where" it falls on a
spectrum of bandwidth and latency needs. For the tuple of
read/write-latency and read/write-bandwidth, "coordinates" is not a perfect
fit. Sometimes it is just conveying values in isolation and not a
"location" relative to other performance points, but in the end this data
is used to identify the performance operation point of a given memory-node.
[2]

Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/64471313421f7_1b66294d5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/645e6215ee0de_1e6f2945e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/
Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/170319615734.2212653.15319394025985499185.stgit@djiang5-mobl3
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2023-12-22 14:23:13 -08:00
Huang Ying
6bc2cfdf82 dax, kmem: calculate abstract distance with general interface
Previously, a fixed abstract distance MEMTIER_DEFAULT_DAX_ADISTANCE is
used for slow memory type in kmem driver.  This limits the usage of kmem
driver, for example, it cannot be used for HBM (high bandwidth memory).

So, we use the general abstract distance calculation mechanism in kmem
drivers to get more accurate abstract distance on systems with proper
support.  The original MEMTIER_DEFAULT_DAX_ADISTANCE is used as fallback
only.

Now, multiple memory types may be managed by kmem.  These memory types are
put into the "kmem_memory_types" list and protected by
kmem_memory_type_lock.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230926060628.265989-5-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-16 15:44:39 -07:00
Huang Ying
3718c02dbd acpi, hmat: calculate abstract distance with HMAT
A memory tiering abstract distance calculation algorithm based on ACPI
HMAT is implemented.  The basic idea is as follows.

The performance attributes of system default DRAM nodes are recorded as
the base line.  Whose abstract distance is MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM.  Then,
the ratio of the abstract distance of a memory node (target) to
MEMTIER_ADISTANCE_DRAM is scaled based on the ratio of the performance
attributes of the node to that of the default DRAM nodes.

The functions to record the read/write latency/bandwidth of the default
DRAM nodes and calculate abstract distance according to read/write
latency/bandwidth ratio will be used by CXL CDAT (Coherent Device
Attribute Table) and other memory device drivers.  So, they are put in
memory-tiers.c.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230926060628.265989-4-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-16 15:44:39 -07:00
Huang Ying
07a8bdd412 memory tiering: add abstract distance calculation algorithms management
Patch series "memory tiering: calculate abstract distance based on ACPI
HMAT", v4.

We have the explicit memory tiers framework to manage systems with
multiple types of memory, e.g., DRAM in DIMM slots and CXL memory devices.
Where, same kind of memory devices will be grouped into memory types,
then put into memory tiers.  To describe the performance of a memory type,
abstract distance is defined.  Which is in direct proportion to the memory
latency and inversely proportional to the memory bandwidth.  To keep the
code as simple as possible, fixed abstract distance is used in dax/kmem to
describe slow memory such as Optane DCPMM.

To support more memory types, in this series, we added the abstract
distance calculation algorithm management mechanism, provided a algorithm
implementation based on ACPI HMAT, and used the general abstract distance
calculation interface in dax/kmem driver.  So, dax/kmem can support HBM
(high bandwidth memory) in addition to the original Optane DCPMM.


This patch (of 4):

The abstract distance may be calculated by various drivers, such as ACPI
HMAT, CXL CDAT, etc.  While it may be used by various code which hot-add
memory node, such as dax/kmem etc.  To decouple the algorithm users and
the providers, the abstract distance calculation algorithms management
mechanism is implemented in this patch.  It provides interface for the
providers to register the implementation, and interface for the users.

Multiple algorithm implementations can cooperate via calculating abstract
distance for different memory nodes.  The preference of algorithm
implementations can be specified via priority (notifier_block.priority).

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230926060628.265989-1-ying.huang@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230926060628.265989-2-ying.huang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Rafael J Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-16 15:44:38 -07:00
Li Zhijian
51a23b1be9 acpi,mm: fix typo sibiling -> sibling
First found this typo as reviewing memory tier code. Fix it by sed like:
$ sed -i 's/sibiling/sibling/g' $(git grep -l sibiling)

so the acpi one will be corrected as well.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230802092856.819328-1-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-06 14:44:10 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
8d3a7d797c memory tier: use helper macro __ATTR_RW()
Use helper macro __ATTR_RW to define numa demotion attributes.  Minor
readability improvement.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230715035111.2656784-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-08-18 10:12:38 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
bded67f81e memory tier: rename destroy_memory_type() to put_memory_type()
It appears that destroy_memory_type() isn't a very good name because we
usually will not free the memory_type here.  So rename it to a more
appropriate name i.e.  put_memory_type().

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230706063905.543800-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-08-18 10:12:11 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
f58d7907a3 memory tier: use helper function destroy_memory_type()
Use helper function destroy_memory_type() to release memtype instead of
open code it to help improve code readability a bit.  No functional change
intended.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230626121053.1916447-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-08-18 10:12:06 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
33ee4f1858 memory tier: remove unneeded !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIGRATION) check
establish_demotion_targets() is defined while CONFIG_MIGRATION is
enabled. There's no need to check it again.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230610034114.981861-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:19:29 -07:00
Miaohe Lin
e6c715abb4 memory tier: remove unneeded disable_all_demotion_targets() when !CONFIG_MIGRATION
There's no caller of disable_all_demotion_targets() when CONFIG_MIGRATION
is disabled.  Remove it.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230606120724.208552-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-06-19 16:19:00 -07:00
Tong Tiangen
93419139fa memory tier: release the new_memtier in find_create_memory_tier()
In find_create_memory_tier(), if failed to register device, then we should
release new_memtier from the tier list and put device instead of memtier.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230129040651.1329208-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com
Fixes: 9832fb8783 ("mm/demotion: expose memory tier details via sysfs")
Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen <tongtiangen@huawei.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Guohanjun <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-02-09 16:51:40 -08:00
Miaoqian Lin
4a625ceee8 mm/demotion: fix NULL vs IS_ERR checking in memory_tier_init
alloc_memory_type() returns error pointers on error instead of NULL.  Use
IS_ERR() to check the return value to fix this.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221110030751.1627266-1-linmq006@gmail.com
Fixes: 7b88bda376 ("mm/demotion/dax/kmem: set node's abstract distance to MEMTIER_DEFAULT_DAX_ADISTANCE")
Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-30 15:58:54 -08:00
Liu Shixin
1eeaa4fd39 memory: move hotplug memory notifier priority to same file for easy sorting
The priority of hotplug memory callback is defined in a different file. 
And there are some callers using numbers directly.  Collect them together
into include/linux/memory.h for easy reading.  This allows us to sort
their priorities more intuitively without additional comments.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220923033347.3935160-9-liushixin2@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@huawei.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: zefan li <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-11-08 17:37:17 -08:00
Huang Ying
27d676a1c2 memory tier, sysfs: rename attribute "nodes" to "nodelist"
In sysfs, we use attribute name "cpumap" or "cpus" for cpu mask and
"cpulist" or "cpus_list" for cpu list.  For example, in my system,

 $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpumap
 f,ffffffff
 $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology/core_cpus
 0,00100004
 $ cat cat /sys/devices/system/node/node0/cpulist
 0-35
 $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/topology/core_cpus_list
 2,20

It looks reasonable to use "nodemap" for node mask and "nodelist" for
node list.  So, rename the attribute to follow the naming convention.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221020015122.290097-1-ying.huang@intel.com
Fixes: 9832fb8783 ("mm/demotion: expose memory tier details via sysfs")
Signed-off-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-28 13:37:22 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
9832fb8783 mm/demotion: expose memory tier details via sysfs
Add /sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/ where all memory tier related
details can be found.  All allocated memory tiers will be listed there as
/sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/

The nodes which are part of a specific memory tier can be listed via
/sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering/memory_tierN/nodes

A directory hierarchy looks like
:/sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering$ tree memory_tier4/
memory_tier4/
├── nodes
├── subsystem -> ../../../../bus/memory_tiering
└── uevent

:/sys/devices/virtual/memory_tiering$ cat memory_tier4/nodes
0,2

[aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com: drop toptier_nodes from sysfs]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220922102201.62168-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220830081736.119281-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:13 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
467b171af8 mm/demotion: update node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers
With memory tier support we can have memory only NUMA nodes in the top
tier from which we want to avoid promotion tracking NUMA faults.  Update
node_is_toptier to work with memory tiers.  All NUMA nodes are by default
top tier nodes.  With lower(slower) memory tiers added we consider all
memory tiers above a memory tier having CPU NUMA nodes as a top memory
tier

[sj@kernel.org: include missed header file, memory-tiers.h]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220820190720.248704-1-sj@kernel.org
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: mm/memory.c needs linux/memory-tiers.h]
[aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com: make toptier_distance inclusive upper bound of toptiers]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220830081457.118960-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-10-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:12 -07:00
Jagdish Gediya
3200802728 mm/demotion: demote pages according to allocation fallback order
Currently, a higher tier node can only be demoted to selected nodes on the
next lower tier as defined by the demotion path.  This strict demotion
order does not work in all use cases (e.g.  some use cases may want to
allow cross-socket demotion to another node in the same demotion tier as a
fallback when the preferred demotion node is out of space).  This demotion
order is also inconsistent with the page allocation fallback order when
all the nodes in a higher tier are out of space: The page allocation can
fall back to any node from any lower tier, whereas the demotion order
doesn't allow that currently.

This patch adds support to get all the allowed demotion targets for a
memory tier.  demote_page_list() function is now modified to utilize this
allowed node mask as the fallback allocation mask.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-9-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:12 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
b26ac6f3ba mm/demotion: drop memtier from memtype
Now that we track node-specific memtier in pg_data_t, we can drop memtier
from memtype.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-8-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:12 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
7766cf7a7e mm/demotion: add pg_data_t member to track node memory tier details
Also update different helpes to use NODE_DATA()->memtier.  Since node
specific memtier can change based on the reassignment of NUMA node to a
different memory tiers, accessing NODE_DATA()->memtier needs to happen
under an rcu read lock or memory_tier_lock.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-7-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:12 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
6c542ab757 mm/demotion: build demotion targets based on explicit memory tiers
This patch switch the demotion target building logic to use memory tiers
instead of NUMA distance.  All N_MEMORY NUMA nodes will be placed in the
default memory tier and additional memory tiers will be added by drivers
like dax kmem.

This patch builds the demotion target for a NUMA node by looking at all
memory tiers below the tier to which the NUMA node belongs.  The closest
node in the immediately following memory tier is used as a demotion
target.

Since we are now only building demotion target for N_MEMORY NUMA nodes the
CPU hotplug calls are removed in this patch.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-6-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:12 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
7b88bda376 mm/demotion/dax/kmem: set node's abstract distance to MEMTIER_DEFAULT_DAX_ADISTANCE
By default, all nodes are assigned to the default memory tier which is the
memory tier designated for nodes with DRAM

Set dax kmem device node's tier to slower memory tier by assigning
abstract distance to MEMTIER_DEFAULT_DAX_ADISTANCE.  Low-level drivers
like papr_scm or ACPI NFIT can initialize memory device type to a more
accurate value based on device tree details or HMAT.  If the kernel
doesn't find the memory type initialized, a default slower memory type is
assigned by the kmem driver.

[aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com: assign correct memory type for multiple dax devices with the same node affinity]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220826100224.542312-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-5-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:11 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
c6123a19c9 mm/demotion: add hotplug callbacks to handle new numa node onlined
If the new NUMA node onlined doesn't have a abstract distance assigned,
the kernel adds the NUMA node to default memory tier.

[aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com: fix kernel error with memory hotplug]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220825092019.379069-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-4-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:11 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
9195244022 mm/demotion: move memory demotion related code
This moves memory demotion related code to mm/memory-tiers.c.  No
functional change in this patch.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-3-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:11 -07:00
Aneesh Kumar K.V
992bf77591 mm/demotion: add support for explicit memory tiers
Patch series "mm/demotion: Memory tiers and demotion", v15.

The current kernel has the basic memory tiering support: Inactive pages on
a higher tier NUMA node can be migrated (demoted) to a lower tier NUMA
node to make room for new allocations on the higher tier NUMA node. 
Frequently accessed pages on a lower tier NUMA node can be migrated
(promoted) to a higher tier NUMA node to improve the performance.

In the current kernel, memory tiers are defined implicitly via a demotion
path relationship between NUMA nodes, which is created during the kernel
initialization and updated when a NUMA node is hot-added or hot-removed. 
The current implementation puts all nodes with CPU into the highest tier,
and builds the tier hierarchy tier-by-tier by establishing the per-node
demotion targets based on the distances between nodes.

This current memory tier kernel implementation needs to be improved for
several important use cases:

* The current tier initialization code always initializes each
  memory-only NUMA node into a lower tier.  But a memory-only NUMA node
  may have a high performance memory device (e.g.  a DRAM-backed
  memory-only node on a virtual machine) and that should be put into a
  higher tier.

* The current tier hierarchy always puts CPU nodes into the top tier. 
  But on a system with HBM (e.g.  GPU memory) devices, these memory-only
  HBM NUMA nodes should be in the top tier, and DRAM nodes with CPUs are
  better to be placed into the next lower tier.

* Also because the current tier hierarchy always puts CPU nodes into the
  top tier, when a CPU is hot-added (or hot-removed) and triggers a memory
  node from CPU-less into a CPU node (or vice versa), the memory tier
  hierarchy gets changed, even though no memory node is added or removed. 
  This can make the tier hierarchy unstable and make it difficult to
  support tier-based memory accounting.

* A higher tier node can only be demoted to nodes with shortest distance
  on the next lower tier as defined by the demotion path, not any other
  node from any lower tier.  This strict, demotion order does not work in
  all use cases (e.g.  some use cases may want to allow cross-socket
  demotion to another node in the same demotion tier as a fallback when
  the preferred demotion node is out of space), and has resulted in the
  feature request for an interface to override the system-wide, per-node
  demotion order from the userspace.  This demotion order is also
  inconsistent with the page allocation fallback order when all the nodes
  in a higher tier are out of space: The page allocation can fall back to
  any node from any lower tier, whereas the demotion order doesn't allow
  that.

This patch series make the creation of memory tiers explicit under the
control of device driver.

Memory Tier Initialization
==========================

Linux kernel presents memory devices as NUMA nodes and each memory device
is of a specific type.  The memory type of a device is represented by its
abstract distance.  A memory tier corresponds to a range of abstract
distance.  This allows for classifying memory devices with a specific
performance range into a memory tier.

By default, all memory nodes are assigned to the default tier with
abstract distance 512.

A device driver can move its memory nodes from the default tier.  For
example, PMEM can move its memory nodes below the default tier, whereas
GPU can move its memory nodes above the default tier.

The kernel initialization code makes the decision on which exact tier a
memory node should be assigned to based on the requests from the device
drivers as well as the memory device hardware information provided by the
firmware.

Hot-adding/removing CPUs doesn't affect memory tier hierarchy.


This patch (of 10):

In the current kernel, memory tiers are defined implicitly via a demotion
path relationship between NUMA nodes, which is created during the kernel
initialization and updated when a NUMA node is hot-added or hot-removed. 
The current implementation puts all nodes with CPU into the highest tier,
and builds the tier hierarchy by establishing the per-node demotion
targets based on the distances between nodes.

This current memory tier kernel implementation needs to be improved for
several important use cases,

The current tier initialization code always initializes each memory-only
NUMA node into a lower tier.  But a memory-only NUMA node may have a high
performance memory device (e.g.  a DRAM-backed memory-only node on a
virtual machine) that should be put into a higher tier.

The current tier hierarchy always puts CPU nodes into the top tier.  But
on a system with HBM or GPU devices, the memory-only NUMA nodes mapping
these devices should be in the top tier, and DRAM nodes with CPUs are
better to be placed into the next lower tier.

With current kernel higher tier node can only be demoted to nodes with
shortest distance on the next lower tier as defined by the demotion path,
not any other node from any lower tier.  This strict, demotion order does
not work in all use cases (e.g.  some use cases may want to allow
cross-socket demotion to another node in the same demotion tier as a
fallback when the preferred demotion node is out of space), This demotion
order is also inconsistent with the page allocation fallback order when
all the nodes in a higher tier are out of space: The page allocation can
fall back to any node from any lower tier, whereas the demotion order
doesn't allow that.

This patch series address the above by defining memory tiers explicitly.

Linux kernel presents memory devices as NUMA nodes and each memory device
is of a specific type.  The memory type of a device is represented by its
abstract distance.  A memory tier corresponds to a range of abstract
distance.  This allows for classifying memory devices with a specific
performance range into a memory tier.

This patch configures the range/chunk size to be 128.  The default DRAM
abstract distance is 512.  We can have 4 memory tiers below the default
DRAM with abstract distance range 0 - 127, 127 - 255, 256- 383, 384 - 511.
Faster memory devices can be placed in these faster(higher) memory tiers.
Slower memory devices like persistent memory will have abstract distance
higher than the default DRAM level.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, per Aneesh]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220818131042.113280-2-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Hesham Almatary <hesham.almatary@huawei.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Jagdish Gediya <jvgediya.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26 19:46:11 -07:00