1
Commit Graph

25 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kees Cook
3d6d8d20ec pstore: pass reason to backend write callback
This allows a backend to filter on the dmesg reason as well as the pstore
reason. When ramoops is switched to pstore, this is needed since it has
no interest in storing non-crash dmesg details.

Drop pstore_write() as it has no users, and handling the "reason" here
has no obviously correct value.

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-11-17 13:13:29 -08:00
Kees Cook
f6f8285132 pstore: pass allocated memory region back to caller
The buf_lock cannot be held while populating the inodes, so make the backend
pass forward an allocated and filled buffer instead. This solves the following
backtrace. The effect is that "buf" is only ever used to notify the backends
that something was written to it, and shouldn't be used in the read path.

To replace the buf_lock during the read path, isolate the open/read/close
loop with a separate mutex to maintain serialized access to the backend.

Note that is is up to the pstore backend to cope if the (*write)() path is
called in the middle of the read path.

[   59.691019] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at .../mm/slub.c:847
[   59.691019] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1819, name: mount
[   59.691019] Pid: 1819, comm: mount Not tainted 3.0.8 #1
[   59.691019] Call Trace:
[   59.691019]  [<810252d5>] __might_sleep+0xc3/0xca
[   59.691019]  [<810a26e6>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x32/0xf3
[   59.691019]  [<810b53ac>] ? __d_lookup_rcu+0x6f/0xf4
[   59.691019]  [<810b68b1>] alloc_inode+0x2a/0x64
[   59.691019]  [<810b6903>] new_inode+0x18/0x43
[   59.691019]  [<81142447>] pstore_get_inode.isra.1+0x11/0x98
[   59.691019]  [<81142623>] pstore_mkfile+0xae/0x26f
[   59.691019]  [<810a2a66>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x19/0xb1
[   59.691019]  [<8116c821>] ? ida_get_new_above+0x140/0x158
[   59.691019]  [<811708ea>] ? __init_rwsem+0x1e/0x2c
[   59.691019]  [<810b67e8>] ? inode_init_always+0x111/0x1b0
[   59.691019]  [<8102127e>] ? should_resched+0xd/0x27
[   59.691019]  [<8137977f>] ? _cond_resched+0xd/0x21
[   59.691019]  [<81142abf>] pstore_get_records+0x52/0xa7
[   59.691019]  [<8114254b>] pstore_fill_super+0x7d/0x91
[   59.691019]  [<810a7ff5>] mount_single+0x46/0x82
[   59.691019]  [<8114231a>] pstore_mount+0x15/0x17
[   59.691019]  [<811424ce>] ? pstore_get_inode.isra.1+0x98/0x98
[   59.691019]  [<810a8199>] mount_fs+0x5a/0x12d
[   59.691019]  [<810b9174>] ? alloc_vfsmnt+0xa4/0x14a
[   59.691019]  [<810b9474>] vfs_kern_mount+0x4f/0x7d
[   59.691019]  [<810b9d7e>] do_kern_mount+0x34/0xb2
[   59.691019]  [<810bb15f>] do_mount+0x5fc/0x64a
[   59.691019]  [<810912fb>] ? strndup_user+0x2e/0x3f
[   59.691019]  [<810bb3cb>] sys_mount+0x66/0x99
[   59.691019]  [<8137b537>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-11-17 12:58:07 -08:00
Chen Gong
b238b8fa93 pstore: make pstore write function return normal success/fail value
Currently pstore write interface employs record id as return
value, but it is not enough because it can't tell caller if
the write operation is successful. Pass the record id back via
an argument pointer and return zero for success, non-zero for
failure.

Signed-off-by: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-10-12 09:17:24 -07:00
Don Zickus
abd4d5587b pstore: change mutex locking to spin_locks
pstore was using mutex locking to protect read/write access to the
backend plug-ins.  This causes problems when pstore is executed in
an NMI context through panic() -> kmsg_dump().

This patch changes the mutex to a spin_lock_irqsave then also checks to
see if we are in an NMI context.  If we are in an NMI and can't get the
lock, just print a message stating that and blow by the locking.

All this is probably a hack around the bigger locking problem but it
solves my current situation of trying to sleep in an NMI context.

Tested by loading the lkdtm module and executing a HARDLOCKUP which
will cause the machine to panic inside the nmi handler.

Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-08-16 11:55:58 -07:00
Len Brown
d0e323b470 Merge branch 'apei' into apei-release
Some trivial conflicts due to other various merges
adding to the end of common lists sooner than this one.

	arch/ia64/Kconfig
	arch/powerpc/Kconfig
	arch/x86/Kconfig
	lib/Kconfig
	lib/Makefile

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-08-03 11:30:42 -04:00
Matthew Garrett
b94fdd077e pstore: Make "part" unsigned
We'll never have a negative part, so just make this an unsigned int.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-07-22 16:14:29 -07:00
Matthew Garrett
56280682ce pstore: Add extra context for writes and erases
EFI only provides small amounts of individual storage, and conventionally
puts metadata in the storage variable name. Rather than add a metadata
header to the (already limited) variable storage, it's easier for us to
modify pstore to pass all the information we need to construct a unique
variable name to the appropriate functions.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-07-22 16:14:20 -07:00
Matthew Garrett
638c1fd303 pstore: Extend API for more flexibility in new backends
Some pstore implementations may not have a static context, so extend the
API to pass the pstore_info struct to all calls and allow for a context
pointer.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-07-22 16:14:06 -07:00
Huang Ying
392913de7c ACPI, APEI, Use apei_exec_run_optional in APEI EINJ and ERST
This patch changes APEI EINJ and ERST to use apei_exec_run for
mandatory actions, and apei_exec_run_optional for optional actions.

Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-07-13 23:35:14 -04:00
Chen Gong
f5ec25deb2 pstore: fix potential logic issue in pstore read interface
1) in the calling of erst_read, the parameter of buffer size
maybe overflows and cause crash

2) the return value of erst_read should be checked more strictly

Signed-off-by: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-05-16 11:05:08 -07:00
Chen Gong
06cf91b4b4 pstore: fix pstore filesystem mount/remount issue
Currently after mount/remount operation on pstore filesystem,
the content on pstore will be lost. It is because current ERST
implementation doesn't support multi-user usage, which moves
internal pointer to the end after accessing it. Adding
multi-user support for pstore usage.

Signed-off-by: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-05-16 11:05:00 -07:00
Chen Gong
8d38d74b64 pstore: fix one type of return value in pstore
the return type of function _read_ in pstore is size_t,
but in the callback function of _read_, the logic doesn't
consider it too much, which means if negative value (assuming
error here) is returned, it will be converted to positive because
of type casting. ssize_t is enough for this function.

Signed-off-by: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-05-16 11:04:51 -07:00
Len Brown
02e2407858 Merge branch 'linus' into release
Conflicts:
	arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c

Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-03-23 02:34:54 -04:00
Huang Ying
885b976fad ACPI, APEI, Add ERST record ID cache
APEI ERST firmware interface and implementation has no multiple users
in mind.  For example, if there is four records in storage with ID: 1,
2, 3 and 4, if two ERST readers enumerate the records via
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID as follow,

reader 1		reader 2
1
			2
3
			4
-1
			-1

where -1 signals there is no more record ID.

Reader 1 has no chance to check record 2 and 4, while reader 2 has no
chance to check record 1 and 3.  And any other GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID will
return -1, that is, other readers will has no chance to check any
record even they are not cleared by anyone.

This makes raw GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID not suitable for used by multiple
users.

To solve the issue, an in-memory ERST record ID cache is designed and
implemented.  When enumerating record ID, the ID returned by
GET_NEXT_RECORD_ID is added into cache in addition to be returned to
caller.  So other readers can check the cache to get all record ID
available.

Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2011-03-21 22:59:06 -04:00
Tony Luck
afe997a183 Pull pstorev4 into release branch 2011-03-16 09:58:31 -07:00
Tony Luck
0bb77c465f pstore: X86 platform interface using ACPI/APEI/ERST
The 'error record serialization table' in ACPI provides a suitable
amount of persistent storage for use by the pstore filesystem.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
2011-01-03 14:22:11 -08:00
Stefan Weil
e8a8b252fb Fix spelling mistakes in comments
milisecond -> millisecond
 meassge -> message

Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <trivial@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <weil@mail.berlios.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2011-01-03 13:51:58 +01:00
Huang Ying
3b38bb5f7f ACPI, APEI, use raw spinlock in ERST
ERST writing may be used in NMI or Machine Check Exception handler. So
it need to use raw spinlock instead of normal spinlock.  This patch
fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-12-11 02:01:46 -05:00
Len Brown
fdb8c58a16 Merge branches 'apei', 'battery-mwh-fix', 'bugzilla-10807', 'bugzilla-14736', 'bugzilla-14679', 'bugzilla-16396', 'launchpad-613381' and 'misc' into release 2010-09-29 15:18:28 -04:00
Huang Ying
0bbba38a61 ACPI, APEI, Fix ERST MOVE_DATA instruction implementation
The src_base and dst_base fields in apei_exec_context are physical
address, so they should be ioremaped before being used in ERST
MOVE_DATA instruction.

Reported-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <martinez.javier@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-09-29 14:10:09 -04:00
Huang Ying
3a78f96532 ACPI, APEI, Fix APEI related table size checking
On Huang Ying's machine:

erst_tab->header_length == sizeof(struct acpi_table_einj)

but Yinghai reported that on his machine,

erst_tab->header_length == sizeof(struct acpi_table_einj) -
sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)

To make erst table size checking code works on all systems, both
testing are treated as PASS.

Same situation applies to einj_tab->header_length, so corresponding
table size checking is changed in similar way too.

v2:

- Treat both table size as valid

Originally-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-09-29 13:59:18 -04:00
Lucas De Marchi
58f87ed0d4 ACPI: Fix typos
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-09-28 21:38:19 -04:00
Thomas Gleixner
0a7992c908 acpi: fix bogus preemption logic
The ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() logic was introduced in commit 8bd108d
(ACPICA: add preemption point after each opcode parse).  The follow up
commits abe1dfab6, 138d15692, c084ca70 tried to fix the preemption logic
back and forth, but nobody noticed that the usage of
in_atomic_preempt_off() in that context is wrong.

The check which guards the call of cond_resched() is:

    if (!in_atomic_preempt_off() && !irqs_disabled())

in_atomic_preempt_off() is not intended for general use as the comment
above the macro definition clearly says:

 * Check whether we were atomic before we did preempt_disable():
 * (used by the scheduler, *after* releasing the kernel lock)

On a CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernel the usage of in_atomic_preempt_off() works by
accident, but with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y it's just broken.

The whole purpose of the ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() is to reduce the latency
on a CONFIG_PREEMPT=n kernel, so make ACPI_PREEMPTION_POINT() depend on
CONFIG_PREEMPT=n and remove the in_atomic_preempt_off() check.

Addresses https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16210

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix build]
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Francois Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-08-12 08:43:29 -07:00
Daniel J Blueman
980533b018 correct console log level when ERST ACPI table is not found
When booting 2.6.35-rc3 on a x86 system without an ERST ACPI table with
the 'quiet' option, we still observe an "ERST: Table is not found!"
warning.

Quiesce it to the same info log level as the other 'table not found'
warnings.

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2010-07-01 18:40:29 -07:00
Huang Ying
a08f82d080 ACPI, APEI, Error Record Serialization Table (ERST) support
ERST is a way provided by APEI to save and retrieve hardware error
record to and from some simple persistent storage (such as flash).

The Linux kernel support implementation is quite simple and workable
in NMI context. So it can be used to save hardware error record into
flash in hardware error exception or NMI handler, where other more
complex persistent storage such as disk is not usable. After saving
hardware error records via ERST in hardware error exception or NMI
handler, the error records can be retrieved and logged into disk or
network after a clean reboot.

For more information about ERST, please refer to ACPI Specification
version 4.0, section 17.4.

This patch incorporate fixes from Jin Dongming.

Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
CC: Jin Dongming <jin.dongming@np.css.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
2010-05-19 22:41:31 -04:00