Considering the header mess ATM, it is not always possible to include
the correct header files within board code. Let's keep this simple:
<mach/pxa25x.h> - for pxa25x based platforms
<mach/pxa27x.h> - for pxa27x based platforms
<mach/pxa300.h> - for pxa300 based platforms
<mach/pxa320.h> - for pxa320 based platforms
<mach/pxa930.h> - for pxa930 based platforms
NOTE:
1. one header one board file, they are not compatible (i.e. they have
conflicting definitions which won't compile if included together).
2. Unless strictly necessary, the following header files are considered
to be SoC files use _only_, and is not recommended to be included in
board code:
<mach/hardware.h>
<mach/pxa-regs.h>
<mach/pxa2xx-regs.h>
<mach/pxa3xx-regs.h>
<mach/mfp.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa2xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa25x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa27x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa3xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa300.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa320.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa930.h>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Direct access to USB host controller registers is considered to be not
portable, and is usually a bad sign for poorly abstracted interface.
Introduce .flags and .power_on_delay to "struct pxaohci_platform_data"
so that most platforms don't bother to write their own .init/.exit()
sequences.
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This patch adds core support for CM-X300 board based on PXA300 processor
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
Acked-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
