Rather than using the maximum voltage we get passed to select the DVS
voltage to use remember the highest voltage we've ever seen. This improves
how the driver works when the consumer permits higher voltages than it
will ever selects in order to support the widest possible voltage range.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
If we don't have a DVS VSEL value already set when we start up then start
it off with the value currently being used for ON.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
If the VSEL is not in use prior to us starting up then we need to make
sure we initialise the GPIO before we push the DVS control to being done
by the GPIO.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Read our initial VSEL from the correct register.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
With multiple wm831x devices the device IDs used for the regulators will
not always be contiguous so simply taking the modulus is not sufficient
to look up the ID, we need to reverse the way the ID is generated.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
We need to dereference the pointers to print their values.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Properly kfree rdev->constraints in all set_machine_constraints() error paths.
Also properly kfree rdev->constraints in regulator_register() error paths.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Prevent some head scratching by making the core log about some rare but
possible errors with invalid voltage ranges and modes being set.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
For tps65910, the number of regulator is 13. ( ARRAY_SIZE(tps65910_regs) is 13)
For tps65911, the number of regulator is 12. ( ARRAY_SIZE(tps65911_regs) is 12)
If we are using this driver for tps65911,
we hit array access out of bounds bug in tps65910_probe() because
current implementation always assume the number of regulator is 13 and
thus it will access tps65911_regs[12].
Fix it by setting correct num_regulators for both chips in tps65910_probe(),
and allocated neccessay memory accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Also add a default case in tps65910_list_voltage_dcdc to silence
'volt' may be used uninitialized in this function warning.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Fix a memory leak if chip id is not matched.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
RES_ID is only used in 4030, to send PBM singular message to control
the state of dedicated resources. In 6030, we don't have concept of PBM,
hence removing the definition of RES_ID (num) from macros.
Signed-off-by: Ambresh K <ambresh@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Report the requested load and voltage for each consumer in debugfs when it
is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
No actual users but provide the macro so there's less surprise when it's
not there.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Currently the regulator supply implementation is somewhat complex and
fragile as it doesn't look like standard consumers but is instead a
parallel implementation. This causes issues with locking and reference
counting.
Move the implementation over to using standard consumers to address this.
Rather than only notifying the supply on the first enable/disable we do so
every time the regulator is enabled or disabled, simplifying locking as we
don't need to hold a lock on the consumer we are about to enable.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
We may have multiple devices requesting a supply with the same name so
include the device name in the generated filename for microamps_requested
to avoid duplicate files.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
With verbose filenames we can easily hit 32 characters.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Recent changes in the driver core appear to mean that the data structures
for the driver core are not fully initialised unless the driver is bound.
Make sure the driver core knows the dummy driver is in use by binding it
to a driver.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The n_voltages initializer for the TWL6030_ADJUSTABLE_LDO macro is
off by one, causing the the highest supported voltage to be
unreachable. Setting the machine constraints to only allow the
highest voltage causes errors:
machine_constraints_voltage: VAUX3_6030: unsupportable voltage constraints
twl_reg twl_reg.39: can't register VAUX3_6030, -22
twl_reg: probe of twl_reg.39 failed with error -22
This patch fixes the off by one error. Tested by setting
VAUX3_6030 to 3.3V.
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The WM8994 regulator driver is perfectly happy if the GPIO used to enable
the regulator sleeps so call the appropriate GPIO API.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
In order to reduce the impact of ramp times rather than enabling the
regulators for a device in series use async tasks to run the actual
enables. This means that the delays which the enables implement can all
run in parallel, though it does mean that the order in which the
supplies come on may be unstable.
For super bonus fun points if any of the regulators are shared between
multiple supplies on the same device (as is rather likely) then this
will test our locking. Note that in this case we only delay once for
each physical regulator so the threads shouldn't block each other while
delaying.
It'd be even nicer if we could coalesce writes to a shared enable registers
in PMICs but that's definitely future work, and it may also be useful
and is certainly more achievable to optimise out the parallelism if none
of the regulators implement ramp delays.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
In the case of get_voltage callback is NULL, current implementation in
_regulator_get_voltage will return -EINVAL.
Also returns proper error if ret is negative value.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Adding support for the twl6025. Major difference in the twl6025 is the
group functionality has been removed from the chip so this affects how
regulators are enabled and disabled.
The names of the regulators also changed.
The DCDCs of the 6025 are software controllable as well.
Since V1
Use the features variable passed via platform data instead of calling
global function.
Change the very switch like if statements to be a more readable
switch statement.
Since V2
twl6025 doesn't use remap so remove it from the macros.
Since V3
enable/disable functions for 4030/6030 were seperated upstream so rebase
on top of this. Change DCDC reference to SMPS as this is used in TRM.
Change list_voltage slightly to have less code.
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
TWL6030: regulator is disabled via VREG_STATE
TWL4030: regulator is disabled via VREG_GRP
Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other regulator_ops
Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
TWL6030: regulator is enabled via VREG_STATE
TWL4030: regulator is enabled via VREG_GRP
Since there is nothing common, split twlreg_enable similar to other regulator_ops
Signed-off-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The tps65911 chip introduces new features, including changes in
the regulator module.
- VDD1 and VDD2 remain unchanged.
- VDD3 is now named VDDCTRL and has a wider voltage range.
- LDOs are now named LDO1...8 and voltage ranges are sequential,
making LDOs easier to handle.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
We use val as array index,
thus the valid value rangae for val should be 0 .. n_voltages-1.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Voltage values should be expressed in microvolts, not in milivolts.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Ranjani Vaidyanathan <ra5478@freescale.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
In current implementation, the original macro implementation assumes the caller
pass the parameter starting from 1 (to match the register names in datasheet).
Thus we have unneeded plus one then minus one operations
when using MAX8997_REG_BUCK1DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK2DVS/MAX8997_REG_BUCK5DVS macros.
This patch removes these macros to avoid unneeded plus one then minus one operations
without reducing readability.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
When applying the set_voltage() requests from consumers skip over those
consumers that haven't set anything, otherwise we'll come out with a
maximum voltage of zero.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
If either a regulator driver can't tell us what the optimum mode is (or
doesn't have modes in the first place) or the system doesn't allow DRMS
changes then it's more helpful for users to just say that we're in the
optimal mode, even if it's from a selection of one.
Still report errors if the process of picking and setting a mode changes as
this may indicate that we're stuck in a low power mode and unable to deliver
a higher current that the consumer just asked for.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The desc_id variable should not be a static variable.
The rest of the code assumes the desc_id must less than TPSxxxxx_NUM_REGULATOR.
If we set desc_id to be a static variable, checking the return value of
rdev_get_id() may return error.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Cc: Anuj Aggarwal <anuj.aggarwal@ti.com>
Cc: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
I check this patch again and found this actually is not a bug
because MC13xxx_DEFINE explictly defines the order of each entry in the array.
Thus revert the patch.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
These became unused with the IRQ removal patch, I'm fairly sure that a
patch was sent earlier by someone else but it doesn't seem to have been
applied and I don't have a copy sitting around any more.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The regulator module consists of 3 DCDCs and 8 LDOs. The output
voltages are configurable and are meant to supply power to the
main processor and other components
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@slimlogic.co.uk>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Currently, we call mc13xxx_reg_read and mc13xxx_reg_rmw for the same register.
This can be converted to simply a mc13xxx_reg_read and a mc13xxx_reg_write,
thus save a redundant register read.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Some systems, particularly physically large systems used for early
prototyping, may experience substantial voltage drops between the regulator
and the consumers as a result of long traces in the system. With these
systems voltages may need to be set higher than requested in order to
ensure reliable system operation.
Allow systems to work around such hardware issues by allowing constraints
to supply an offset to be applied to any requested and reported voltages.
This is not ideal, especially since the voltage drop may be load dependant,
but is sufficient for most affected systems, it is not expected to be used
in production hardware. The offset is applied after all constraint
processing so constraints should be specified in terms of consumer values
not physically configured values.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
supply_regulator_dev (using a struct pointer) has been deprecated in favour
of supply_regulator (using a regulator name) for quite a few releases
now with a warning generated if it is used and there are no current in tree
users so just remove the code.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
In include/linux/mfd/mc13892.h, we define MC13892_VCOINCELL as 23.
Thus VCOINCELL should be defined as 23th element in mc13892_regulators array, not the first one.
This actually fixes an off-by-one bug while accessing mc13892_regulators array.
For example,
In mc13892_regulator_probe, we use MC13892_VCAM as array index of mc13892_regulators array.
mc13892_regulators[MC13892_VCAM].desc.ops->set_mode
= mc13892_vcam_set_mode;
Currently, it access mc13892_regulators[12] ,which is VAUDIO not VCAM.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
Don't go looking up the rdev pointer every time, just use a local variable
like everything else.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
The second parameter of regulator_mode_constrain takes a pointer.
This patch fixes below warning:
drivers/regulator/core.c: In function 'regulator_set_mode':
drivers/regulator/core.c:2014: warning: passing argument 2 of 'regulator_mode_constrain' makes pointer from integer without a cast
drivers/regulator/core.c:200: note: expected 'int *' but argument is of type 'unsigned int'
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@vega.(none)>
Current set_mode logic does not support 6030. The logic for 4030 is
not reusable for 6030 as the mode setting for 6030 now uses the new
CFG_STATE register. We hence rename the old get_status as being
specific to 4030.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Saquib Herman <saquib@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@vega.(none)>
Current get_status logic does not support 6030 get_status.
The logic for 4030 is not reusable for 6030 as the status
check for 6030 now depends on the new CFG_STATE register.
We hence rename the old get_status as being specific to
4030 and remove the redundant check for the same.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Saquib Herman <saquib@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@vega.(none)>
With TWL6030, it is not enough to ensure that the regulator is the
group of P1 group (CPU/Linux), but we need to check the state as far
as APP is concerned as well.
Split the current is_enabled to 6030 and 4030 specific ones. This
split impacts few macros and variables as well, but sets up the
stage for further fixes to set_mode and get_status in subsequent
patches.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Saquib Herman <saquib@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@vega.(none)>
TWL6030 does not have remap register. The current implementation
causes value of remap to be written to state register, accidentally
causing the regulators which are probed to be switched on as well.
This is wrong as regulators should be controllable based on calls
to enable/disable for TWL regulator framework. Further, the values
initialized make no sense as well. We hence remove this from the
initalizers and also write to remap register only if the TWL
is 4030.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Saquib Herman <saquib@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@vega.(none)>
TWL6030 requires an additional register write to CFG_STATE register
to explicitly state that the regulator is in a certain state. Merely
associating the regulator with the group is not enough. Add the
required register field definitions and fix the handling for
TWL6030 enable/disable.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Saquib Herman <saquib@ti.com>
Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@vega.(none)>
