1
Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Anand Gadiyar
963fec4e0f ARM: 6484/1: fix compile warning in mm/init.c
Commit 7c63984b86 (ARM: do not define VMALLOC_END relative to PAGE_OFFSET)
changed VMALLOC_END to be an explicit value. Before this, it was
relative to PAGE_OFFSET and therefore converted to unsigned long
as PAGE_OFFSET is an unsigned long. This introduced the following
build warning. Fix this by changing the explicit defines of
VMALLOC_END to be unsigned long.

  CC      arch/arm/mm/init.o
arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'mem_init':
arch/arm/mm/init.c:606: warning: format '%08lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 12 has type 'unsigned int'

Signed-off-by: Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.dee>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2010-11-21 22:05:56 +00:00
Nicolas Pitre
7c63984b86 ARM: do not define VMALLOC_END relative to PAGE_OFFSET
VMALLOC_END is supposed to be an absolute value, while PAGE_OFFSET may
vary depending on the selected user:kernel memory split mode through
CONFIG_VMSPLIT_*.  In fact, the goal of moving PAGE_OFFSET down is to
accommodate more directly addressed RAM by the kernel below the vmalloc
area, and having VMALLOC_END move along PAGE_OFFSET is rather against
the very reason why PAGE_OFFSET can be moved in the first place.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
2010-10-01 22:28:19 -04:00
Tony Lindgren
72464dbae2 omap: Split vmalloc.h for mach-omap1 and mach-omap2
Earlier patch "omap: Remap L3, L4 to get more kernel io address space"
changed the VMALLOC_END.

However, this change causes problems on mach-omap1:

BUG: mapping for 0xe0000000 at 0xe0000000 overlaps vmalloc space
BUG: mapping for 0xe1000000 at 0xe1000000 overlaps vmalloc space

Fix this by creating separate vmalloc.h files for mach-omap1
and mach-omap2.

Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
2009-10-19 17:26:29 -07:00