The distinction between scic_sds_ scic_ and sci_ are no longer relevant
so just unify the prefixes on sci_. The distinction between isci_ and
sci_ is historically significant, and useful for comparing the old
'core' to the current Linux driver. 'sci_' represents the former core as
well as the routines that are closer to the hardware and protocol than
their 'isci_' brethren. sci == sas controller interface.
Also unwind the 'sds1' out of the parameter structs.
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Remove the distinction between these two implementations and unify on
isci_host (local instances named ihost). Hmmm, we had two
'oem_parameters' instances, one was unused... nice.
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
We can call the EFI get_variable service routine directly to retrieve
the EFI variable that holds the OEM parameters table.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
* Move port configuration agent implementation
* Merge core/scic_sds_port.[ch] into port.[ch]
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
cross driver constants are spread out over multiple header files, consolidate
them into isci.h, and push some includes out to the source files that need
them.
TODO: remove SCI_MODE_SIZE infrastructure.
TODO: task.h is full of inlines that are too large
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The element_length is 2 bytes.
Reported-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Converting the all CAPS data types to lower case.
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
The original apc mode definition is the correct one, the fix from commit
4711ba10 "isci: fix oem parameter initialization and mode detection" was based
on a typo from a specification update.
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
1/ Since commit 858d4aa7 "isci: Move firmware loading to per PCI device" we have
been silently falling back to built-in defaults for the parameter settings by
skipping the call to scic_oem_parameters_set().
2/ The afe parameters from the firmware were not being honored
3/ The latest oem parameter definition flips the mode_type values which are
now 0: for APC 1: for MPC. For APC we need to make sure all the phys
default to the same address otherwise strict_wide_ports will cause duplicate
domains.
4/ Fix up the driver announcement to indicate the source of the
parameters.
5/ Fix up the sas addresses to be unique per controller (in the fallback case)
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Updating the EFI variable OEM parameter retrieval after examining the EFI
variable exported via sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Added fixups for the OROM parsing code after testing with BIOS OROM
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
These are the finalized values that the driver can expect to see in
production.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
1/ add OEM paramater support for mode_type (MPC vs APC)
2/ add OEM parameter support for max_number_concurrent_device_spin_up
3/ cleanup scic_sds_controller_start_next_phy
todo: hook up the amp control afe parameters into the afe init code
Signed-off-by: Henryk Dembkowski <henryk.dembkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jacek Danecki <Jacek.Danecki@intel.com>
[cleaned up scic_sds_controller_start_next_phy]
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Adding EFI variable retrieving for OEM parameters. Still need GUID and
variable name.
Also updated the data struct for oem parameters and hex file for firmware
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
[fix CONFIG_EFI=n compile error]
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
We need to scan the OROM for signature and grab the OEM parameters. We
also need to do the same for EFI. If all fails then we resort to user
binary blob, and if that fails then we go to the defaults.
Share the format with the create_fw utility so that all possible sources
of the parameters are in-sync.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
