1
Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
H. Peter Anvin
b74b06c5f6 x86: boot: stub out unimplemented CPU feature words
The CPU feature detection code in the boot code is somewhat minimal,
and doesn't include all possible CPUID words.  In particular, it
doesn't contain the code for CPU feature words 2 (Transmeta),
3 (Linux-specific), 5 (VIA), or 7 (scattered).  Zero them out, so we
can still set those bits as known at compile time; in particular, this
allows creating a Linux-specific NOPL flag and have it required (and
therefore resolvable at compile time) in 64-bit mode.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
2008-09-05 16:13:44 -07:00
H. Peter Anvin
c2dcfde827 x86: cleanup for setup code crashes during IST probe
Clean up the code for crashes during SpeedStep probing on older
machines.

Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-14 00:13:52 +02:00
Joerg Roedel
7b27718bdb x86: fix setup code crashes on my old 486 box
yesterday I tried to reactivate my old 486 box and wanted to install a
current Linux with latest kernel on it. But it turned out that the
latest kernel does not boot because the machine crashes early in the
setup code.

After some debugging it turned out that the problem is the query_ist()
function. If this interrupt with that function is called the machine
simply locks up. It looks like a BIOS bug. Looking for a workaround for
this problem I wrote the attached patch. It checks for the CPUID
instruction and if it is not implemented it does not call the speedstep
BIOS function. As far as I know speedstep should be available since some
Pentium earliest.

Alan Cox observed that it's available since the Pentium II, so cpuid
levels 4 and 5 can be excluded altogether.

H. Peter Anvin cleaned up the code some more:

> Right in concept, but I dislike the implementation (duplication of the
> CPU detect code we already have).  Could you try this patch and see if
> it works for you?

which, with a small modification to fix a build error with it the
resulting kernel boots on my machine.

Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Signed-off-by: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-08-13 11:59:18 +02:00
WANG Cong
cf9b111c17 x86: remove pointless comments
Remove old comments that include the old arch/i386 directory.

Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2008-04-19 19:19:54 +02:00
Paolo Ciarrocchi
7030760ae5 x86: coding style fixes to arch/x86/boot/cpucheck.c
Before:
   total: 30 errors, 0 warnings, 262 lines checked
After:
   total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 262 lines checked

No code changed:

arch/x86/boot/cpucheck.o:

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    989	      0	     96	   1085	    43d	cpucheck.o.before
    989	      0	     96	   1085	    43d	cpucheck.o.after

md5:
   06634cfefb8438fa284ff903b4cafbce  cpucheck.o.before.asm
   06634cfefb8438fa284ff903b4cafbce  cpucheck.o.after.asm

Signed-off-by: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2008-04-17 17:40:50 +02:00
Sam Ravnborg
1032c0ba9d x86: arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu unification
Move all CPU definitions to Kconfig.cpu
Always define X86_MINIMUM_CPU_FAMILY and do the
obvious code cleanup in boot/cpucheck.c

Comments from: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> incorporated.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
2007-11-12 21:02:19 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
96ae6ea0be i386: move boot
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2007-10-11 11:16:45 +02:00