1
Commit Graph

23 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Woodhouse
99988f7bbd [JFFS2] Introduce ref_next() macro for finding next physical node
Another part of the preparation for switching to an array...

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-24 09:04:17 +01:00
David Woodhouse
2f785402f3 [JFFS2] Reduce visibility of raw_node_ref to upper layers of JFFS2 code.
As the first step towards eliminating the ref->next_phys member and saving
memory by using an _array_ of struct jffs2_raw_node_ref per eraseblock,
stop the write functions from allocating their own refs; have them just
_reserve_ the appropriate number instead. Then jffs2_link_node_ref() can
just fill them in.

Use a linked list of pre-allocated refs in the superblock, for now. Once
we switch to an array, it'll just be a case of extending that array.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-24 02:04:45 +01:00
David Woodhouse
9fe4854cd1 [JFFS2] Remove flash offset argument from various functions.
We don't need the upper layers to deal with the physical offset. It's
_always_ c->nextblock->offset + c->sector_size - c->nextblock->free_size
so we might as well just let the actual write functions deal with that.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-23 00:38:06 +01:00
David Woodhouse
0eac940b8a [JFFS2] Add some preemptive BUG checks for XATTR code
In a couple of places, we assume that what's at the end of the
->next_in_ino list is a struct jffs2_inode_cache. Let's check
for that, since we expect it to change soon.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-22 16:29:23 +01:00
David Woodhouse
fcb7578719 [JFFS2] Extend jffs2_link_node_ref() to link into per-inode list too.
Let's avoid the potential for forgetting to set ref->next_in_ino, by doing
it within jffs2_link_node_ref() instead.

This highlights the ugliness of what we're currently doing with
xattr_datum and xattr_ref structures -- we should find a nicer way of
dealing with that.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-22 15:23:10 +01:00
David Woodhouse
ca89a517fa [JFFS2] Finally eliminate __totlen field from struct jffs2_raw_node_ref
Well, almost. We'll actually keep a 'TEST_TOTLEN' macro set for now, and keep
doing some paranoia checks to make sure it's all working correctly. But if
TEST_TOTLEN is unset, the size of struct jffs2_raw_node_ref drops from 16
bytes to 12 on 32-bit machines. That's a saving of about half a megabyte of
memory on the OLPC prototype board, with 125K or so nodes in its 512MiB of
flash.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-21 13:29:11 +01:00
David Woodhouse
b64335f2b7 [JFFS2] Add length argument to jffs2_add_physical_node_ref()
If __totlen is going away, we need to pass the length in separately.
Also stop callers from needlessly setting ref->next_phys to NULL,
since that's done for them... and since that'll also be going away soon.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-21 04:36:45 +01:00
David Woodhouse
f1f9671bd8 [JFFS2] Introduce jffs2_link_node_ref() function to reduce code duplication
The same sequence of code was repeated in many places, to add a new
struct jffs2_raw_node_ref to an eraseblock and adjust the space accounting
accordingly. Move it out-of-line.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-20 19:45:26 +01:00
David Woodhouse
1417fc44ee [JFFS2] Reduce calls to ref_totlen() in jffs2_mark_node_obsolete()
We were calling ref_totlen() 18 times. Even before that becomes a real
function rather than just a dereference, apparently some compilers still
suck anyway. It'll _certainly_ suck after ref_totlen() becomes more
complicated, so calculate it once and don't rely on CSE.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
2006-05-20 16:20:19 +01:00
Thomas Gleixner
182ec4eee3 [JFFS2] Clean up trailing white spaces
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-11-07 14:18:56 +01:00
Artem B. Bityutskiy
733802d974 [JFFS2] Debug code simplification, update TODO
Simplify the debugging code further.
Update the TODO list

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-11-06 22:20:33 +01:00
Ferenc Havasi
34c0e90671 [JFFS2] Account summary space in reserved_size.
Always keep valid data in reserved_size.

It did not cause problems, but the reservation code was unoptimal
when centralized summary was active or the size of the erase block
was very small.

Signed-off-by: Ferenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-11-06 21:47:18 +01:00
Ferenc Havasi
e631ddba58 [JFFS2] Add erase block summary support (mount time improvement)
The goal of summary is to speed up the mount time. Erase block summary (EBS)
stores summary information at the end of every (closed) erase block. It is
no longer necessary to scan all nodes separetly (and read all pages of them)
just read this "small" summary, where every information is stored which is
needed at mount time.

This summary information is stored in a JFFS2_FEATURE_RWCOMPAT_DELETE. During
the mount process if there is no summary info the orignal scan process will
be executed. EBS works with NAND and NOR flashes, too.

There is a user space tool called sumtool to generate this summary
information for a JFFS2 image.

Signed-off-by: Ferenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-11-06 21:29:48 +01:00
Artem B. Bityutskiy
e0c8e42f8f [JFFS2] Debug code clean up - step 3
Various simplifiactions. printk format corrections.
Convert more code to use the new debug functions.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-11-06 17:06:49 +01:00
Artem B. Bityutskiy
730554d946 [JFFS2] Debug code clean up - step 1
Move debug functions into a seperate source file

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-11-06 16:21:25 +01:00
Artem B. Bityuckiy
4132ace8d6 [JFFS2] Suppress annoying debug messages
Embrace uneeded messages in D1().

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 13:20:00 +02:00
Artem B. Bityuckiy
6f401a40b5 [JFFS2] Add KERN_DEBUG level to printks
Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 13:09:44 +02:00
Artem B. Bityuckiy
437316d9b5 [JFFS2] Forbid to free inode_cache objects if its nlink isn't zero.
Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 13:02:39 +02:00
Artem B. Bityuckiy
31fbdf7aa5 [JFFS2] Fix NOR specific scan BUG
Fix fairly sad NOR-specific bug - during FS building ic->scan_dents
isn't zero, but jffs2_mark_node_obsolete() migt be called it tries to
finde the ic corresponding to ref - this requires ic->scan_dents = 0.

Signed-off-by: Artem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 12:47:15 +02:00
David Woodhouse
67e345d17f [JFFS2] Prevent ino cache removal for inodes in use
Don't remove inocache for inodes which are in read_inode() or
clear_inode() until they're done.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 12:46:14 +02:00
Estelle Hammache
9b88f47390 [JFFS2] Code cleanup
Code beautification and block filing correction for optimization.

Signed-off-by: Estelle Hammache <estelle.hammache@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 12:16:06 +02:00
Estelle Hammache
3118db3dfe [JFFS2] Fix refile of blocks due to write failure.
avoid segfault when nextblock was refiled because of a write failure
- avoid filing blocks on the clean list when they have wasted
space

Signed-off-by: Estelle Hammache <estelle.hammache@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
2005-05-23 12:14:34 +02:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00