1
Commit Graph

61 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Chinner
249a8c1124 [XFS] Move AIL pushing into it's own thread
When many hundreds to thousands of threads all try to do simultaneous
transactions and the log is in a tail-pushing situation (i.e. full), we
can get multiple threads walking the AIL list and contending on the AIL
lock.

The AIL push is, in effect, a simple I/O dispatch algorithm complicated by
the ordering constraints placed on it by the transaction subsystem. It
really does not need multiple threads to push on it - even when only a
single CPU is pushing the AIL, it can push the I/O out far faster that
pretty much any disk subsystem can handle.

So, to avoid contention problems stemming from multiple list walkers, move
the list walk off into another thread and simply provide a "target" to
push to. When a thread requires a push, it sets the target and wakes the
push thread, then goes to sleep waiting for the required amount of space
to become available in the log.

This mechanism should also be a lot fairer under heavy load as the waiters
will queue in arrival order, rather than queuing in "who completed a push
first" order.

Also, by moving the pushing to a separate thread we can do more
effectively overload detection and prevention as we can keep context from
loop iteration to loop iteration. That is, we can push only part of the
list each loop and not have to loop back to the start of the list every
time we run. This should also help by reducing the number of items we try
to lock and/or push items that we cannot move.

Note that this patch is not intended to solve the inefficiencies in the
AIL structure and the associated issues with extremely large list
contents. That needs to be addresses separately; parallel access would
cause problems to any new structure as well, so I'm only aiming to isolate
the structure from unbounded parallelism here.

SGI-PV: 972759
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:30371a

Signed-off-by: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
2008-02-07 18:22:51 +11:00
Donald Douwsma
287f3dad14 [XFS] Unwrap AIL_LOCK
SGI-PV: 970382
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:29739a

Signed-off-by: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
2008-02-07 16:44:23 +11:00
David Chinner
da353b0d64 [XFS] Radix tree based inode caching
One of the perpetual scaling problems XFS has is indexing it's incore
inodes. We currently uses hashes and the default hash sizes chosen can
only ever be a tradeoff between memory consumption and the maximum
realistic size of the cache.

As a result, anyone who has millions of inodes cached on a filesystem
needs to tunes the size of the cache via the ihashsize mount option to
allow decent scalability with inode cache operations.

A further problem is the separate inode cluster hash, whose size is based
on the ihashsize but is smaller, and so under certain conditions (sparse
cluster cache population) this can become a limitation long before the
inode hash is causing issues.

The following patchset removes the inode hash and cluster hash and
replaces them with radix trees to avoid the scalability limitations of the
hashes. It also reduces the size of the inodes by 3 pointers....

SGI-PV: 969561
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:29481a

Signed-off-by: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
2007-10-15 16:50:50 +10:00
Vlad Apostolov
7666ab5fb3 [XFS] Workaround log space issue by increasing XFS_TRANS_PUSH_AIL_RESTARTS
SGI-PV: 959264
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:27750a

Signed-off-by: Vlad Apostolov <vapo@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Chatterton <chatz@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
2007-02-10 18:35:52 +11:00
Josh Triplett
22d91f65d5 [XFS] Add lock annotations to xfs_trans_update_ail and
xfs_trans_delete_ail

xfs_trans_update_ail and xfs_trans_delete_ail get called with the AIL lock
held, and release it. Add lock annotations to these two functions so that
sparse can check callers for lock pairing, and so that sparse will not
complain about these functions since they intentionally use locks in this
manner.

SGI-PV: 954580
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26807a

Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett <josh@freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
2006-09-28 11:04:07 +10:00
Nathan Scott
f6c2d1fa63 [XFS] Remove version 1 directory code. Never functioned on Linux, just
pure bloat.

SGI-PV: 952969
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26251a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2006-06-20 13:04:51 +10:00
Nathan Scott
7d04a335b6 [XFS] Shutdown the filesystem if all device paths have gone. Made
shutdown vop flags consistent with sync vop flags declarations too.

SGI-PV: 939911
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26096a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2006-06-09 14:58:38 +10:00
Nathan Scott
7b71876980 [XFS] Update license/copyright notices to match the prefered SGI
boilerplate.

SGI-PV: 913862
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23903a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2005-11-02 14:58:39 +11:00
Nathan Scott
a844f4510d [XFS] Remove xfs_macros.c, xfs_macros.h, rework headers a whole lot.
SGI-PV: 943122
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23901a

Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2005-11-02 14:38:42 +11:00
Tim Shimmin
6f948fbd44 [XFS] Need to unlock the AIL before calling xfs_force_shutdown() because
when it goes to force out the log, and get the tail lsn, it will want to
get the AIL lock.

SGI-PV: 940076
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23260a

Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
2005-09-02 16:52:55 +10:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00