kevin/linux
1
Fork 0
Code

timers: Rename next_expiry_recalc() to be unique

Browse Source 
next_expiry_recalc is the name of a function as well as the name of a
struct member of struct timer_base. This might lead to confusion.

Rename next_expiry_recalc() to timer_recalc_next_expiry(). No functional
change.

Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240904-devel-anna-maria-b4-timers-flseep-v1-1-e98760256370@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
Anna-Maria Behnsen 2024-09-04 15:04:51 +02:00 committed by Thomas Gleixner
parent d7b01b81bd
commit fe90c5ba88
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
kernel/time/timer.c
View File

@ -1900,7 +1900,7 @@ static int next_pending_bucket(struct timer_base *base, unsigned offset,
*
* Store next expiry time in base->next_expiry.
*/
static void next_expiry_recalc(struct timer_base *base)
static void timer_recalc_next_expiry(struct timer_base *base)
{
unsigned long clk, next, adj;
unsigned lvl, offset = 0;
@ -2009,7 +2009,7 @@ static unsigned long next_timer_interrupt(struct timer_base *base,
unsigned long basej)
{
if (base->next_expiry_recalc)
next_expiry_recalc(base);
timer_recalc_next_expiry(base);
/*
* Move next_expiry for the empty base into the future to prevent an
@ -2413,7 +2413,7 @@ static inline void __run_timers(struct timer_base *base)
* jiffies to avoid endless requeuing to current jiffies.
*/
base->clk++;
next_expiry_recalc(base);
timer_recalc_next_expiry(base);
while (levels--)
expire_timers(base, heads + levels);