Tracing fixes for v6.8-rc7:

- Do not allow large strings (> 4096) as single write to trace_marker
 
   The size of a string written into trace_marker was determined by
   the size of the sub-buffer in the ring buffer. That size is
   dependent on the PAGE_SIZE of the architecture as it can be mapped
   into user space. But on PowerPC, where PAGE_SIZE is 64K, that made
   the limit of the string of writing into trace_marker 64K.
 
   One of the selftests looks at the size of the ring buffer sub-buffers
   and writes that plus more into the trace_marker. The write will take
   what it can and report back what it consumed so that the user space
   application (like echo) will write the rest of the string. The string
   is stored in the ring buffer and can be read via the "trace" or
   "trace_pipe" files.
 
   The reading of the ring buffer uses vsnprintf(), which uses a precision
   "%.*s" to make sure it only reads what is stored in the buffer, as
   a bug could cause the string to be non terminated.
 
   With the combination of the precision change and the PAGE_SIZE of 64K
   allowing huge strings to be added into the ring buffer, plus the test
   that would actually stress that limit, a bug was reported that
   the precision used was too big for "%.*s" as the string was close to
   64K in size and the max precision of vsnprintf is 32K.
 
   Linus suggested not to have that precision as it could hide a bug
   if the string was again stored without a nul byte.
 
   Another issue that was brought up is that the trace_seq buffer is
   also based on PAGE_SIZE even though it is not tied to the architecture
   limit like the ring buffer sub-buffer is. Having it be 64K * 2 is
   simply just too big and wasting memory on systems with 64K page sizes.
   It is now hardcoded to 8K which is what all other architectures with
   4K PAGE_SIZE has.
 
   Finally, the write to trace_marker is now limited to 4K as there is no
   reason to write larger strings into trace_marker.
 
 - ring_buffer_wait() should not loop.
   The ring_buffer_wait() does not have the full context (yet) on if it
   should loop or not. Just exit the loop as soon as its woken up and
   let the callers decide to loop or not (they already do, so it's a bit
   redundant).
 
 - Fix shortest_full field to be the smallest amount in the ring buffer that
   a waiter is waiting for. The "shortest_full" field is updated when a new
   waiter comes in and wants to wait for a smaller amount of data in the
   ring buffer than other waiters. But after all waiters are woken up, it's
   not reset, so if another waiter comes in wanting to wait for more data,
   it will be woken up when the ring buffer has a smaller amount from what
   the previous waiters were waiting for.
 
 - The wake up all waiters on close is incorrectly called frome .release()
   and not from .flush() so it will never wake up any waiters as the
   .release() will not get called until all .read() calls are finished. And the
   wakeup is for the waiters in those .read() calls.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iIoEABYIADIWIQRRSw7ePDh/lE+zeZMp5XQQmuv6qgUCZe3j6xQccm9zdGVkdEBn
 b29kbWlzLm9yZwAKCRAp5XQQmuv6qmYOAQD6rPZ+ILqHmRQMZjsxaasBeVYidspY
 wj3fRGzwfiB6fgEAkIeA7FOrkOK0CuG8R+2AtQNF5ZjXdmfZdiYQD1/EjQU=
 =Hqlf
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'trace-ring-buffer-v6.8-rc7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace

Pull tracing fixes from Steven Rostedt:

 - Do not allow large strings (> 4096) as single write to trace_marker

   The size of a string written into trace_marker was determined by the
   size of the sub-buffer in the ring buffer. That size is dependent on
   the PAGE_SIZE of the architecture as it can be mapped into user
   space. But on PowerPC, where PAGE_SIZE is 64K, that made the limit of
   the string of writing into trace_marker 64K.

   One of the selftests looks at the size of the ring buffer sub-buffers
   and writes that plus more into the trace_marker. The write will take
   what it can and report back what it consumed so that the user space
   application (like echo) will write the rest of the string. The string
   is stored in the ring buffer and can be read via the "trace" or
   "trace_pipe" files.

   The reading of the ring buffer uses vsnprintf(), which uses a
   precision "%.*s" to make sure it only reads what is stored in the
   buffer, as a bug could cause the string to be non terminated.

   With the combination of the precision change and the PAGE_SIZE of 64K
   allowing huge strings to be added into the ring buffer, plus the test
   that would actually stress that limit, a bug was reported that the
   precision used was too big for "%.*s" as the string was close to 64K
   in size and the max precision of vsnprintf is 32K.

   Linus suggested not to have that precision as it could hide a bug if
   the string was again stored without a nul byte.

   Another issue that was brought up is that the trace_seq buffer is
   also based on PAGE_SIZE even though it is not tied to the
   architecture limit like the ring buffer sub-buffer is. Having it be
   64K * 2 is simply just too big and wasting memory on systems with 64K
   page sizes. It is now hardcoded to 8K which is what all other
   architectures with 4K PAGE_SIZE has.

   Finally, the write to trace_marker is now limited to 4K as there is
   no reason to write larger strings into trace_marker.

 - ring_buffer_wait() should not loop.

   The ring_buffer_wait() does not have the full context (yet) on if it
   should loop or not. Just exit the loop as soon as its woken up and
   let the callers decide to loop or not (they already do, so it's a bit
   redundant).

 - Fix shortest_full field to be the smallest amount in the ring buffer
   that a waiter is waiting for. The "shortest_full" field is updated
   when a new waiter comes in and wants to wait for a smaller amount of
   data in the ring buffer than other waiters. But after all waiters are
   woken up, it's not reset, so if another waiter comes in wanting to
   wait for more data, it will be woken up when the ring buffer has a
   smaller amount from what the previous waiters were waiting for.

 - The wake up all waiters on close is incorrectly called frome
   .release() and not from .flush() so it will never wake up any waiters
   as the .release() will not get called until all .read() calls are
   finished. And the wakeup is for the waiters in those .read() calls.

* tag 'trace-ring-buffer-v6.8-rc7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/trace/linux-trace:
  tracing: Use .flush() call to wake up readers
  ring-buffer: Fix resetting of shortest_full
  ring-buffer: Fix waking up ring buffer readers
  tracing: Limit trace_marker writes to just 4K
  tracing: Limit trace_seq size to just 8K and not depend on architecture PAGE_SIZE
  tracing: Remove precision vsnprintf() check from print event

include/linux/trace_seq.h

@@ -9,9 +9,15 @@
 /*
  * Trace sequences are used to allow a function to call several other functions
  * to create a string of data to use.
+ *
+ * Have the trace seq to be 8K which is typically PAGE_SIZE * 2 on
+ * most architectures. The TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE (which is
+ * TRACE_SEQ_SIZE minus the other fields of trace_seq), is the
+ * max size the output of a trace event may be.
  */
 
-#define TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE	(PAGE_SIZE * 2 - \
+#define TRACE_SEQ_SIZE		8192
+#define TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE	(TRACE_SEQ_SIZE - \
 	(sizeof(struct seq_buf) + sizeof(size_t) + sizeof(int)))
 
 struct trace_seq {

kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c

@@ -384,7 +384,6 @@ struct rb_irq_work {
 	struct irq_work			work;
 	wait_queue_head_t		waiters;
 	wait_queue_head_t		full_waiters;
-	long				wait_index;
 	bool				waiters_pending;
 	bool				full_waiters_pending;
 	bool				wakeup_full;
@@ -756,8 +755,19 @@ static void rb_wake_up_waiters(struct irq_work *work)
 
 	wake_up_all(&rbwork->waiters);
 	if (rbwork->full_waiters_pending || rbwork->wakeup_full) {
+		/* Only cpu_buffer sets the above flags */
+		struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer =
+			container_of(rbwork, struct ring_buffer_per_cpu, irq_work);
+
+		/* Called from interrupt context */
+		raw_spin_lock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
 		rbwork->wakeup_full = false;
 		rbwork->full_waiters_pending = false;
+
+		/* Waking up all waiters, they will reset the shortest full */
+		cpu_buffer->shortest_full = 0;
+		raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock);
+
 		wake_up_all(&rbwork->full_waiters);
 	}
 }
@@ -798,14 +808,40 @@ void ring_buffer_wake_waiters(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu)
 		rbwork = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
 	}
 
-	rbwork->wait_index++;
-	/* make sure the waiters see the new index */
-	smp_wmb();
-
 	/* This can be called in any context */
 	irq_work_queue(&rbwork->work);
 }
 
+static bool rb_watermark_hit(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
+{
+	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
+	bool ret = false;
+
+	/* Reads of all CPUs always waits for any data */
+	if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS)
+		return !ring_buffer_empty(buffer);
+
+	cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
+
+	if (!ring_buffer_empty_cpu(buffer, cpu)) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+		bool pagebusy;
+
+		if (!full)
+			return true;
+
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+		pagebusy = cpu_buffer->reader_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page;
+		ret = !pagebusy && full_hit(buffer, cpu, full);
+
+		if (!cpu_buffer->shortest_full ||
+		    cpu_buffer->shortest_full > full)
+			cpu_buffer->shortest_full = full;
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /**
  * ring_buffer_wait - wait for input to the ring buffer
  * @buffer: buffer to wait on
@@ -821,7 +857,6 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 	struct rb_irq_work *work;
-	long wait_index;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	/*
@@ -840,81 +875,54 @@ int ring_buffer_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu, int full)
 		work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
 	}
 
-	wait_index = READ_ONCE(work->wait_index);
+	if (full)
+		prepare_to_wait(&work->full_waiters, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	else
+		prepare_to_wait(&work->waiters, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 
-	while (true) {
-		if (full)
-			prepare_to_wait(&work->full_waiters, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
-		else
-			prepare_to_wait(&work->waiters, &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+	/*
+	 * The events can happen in critical sections where
+	 * checking a work queue can cause deadlocks.
+	 * After adding a task to the queue, this flag is set
+	 * only to notify events to try to wake up the queue
+	 * using irq_work.
+	 *
+	 * We don't clear it even if the buffer is no longer
+	 * empty. The flag only causes the next event to run
+	 * irq_work to do the work queue wake up. The worse
+	 * that can happen if we race with !trace_empty() is that
+	 * an event will cause an irq_work to try to wake up
+	 * an empty queue.
+	 *
+	 * There's no reason to protect this flag either, as
+	 * the work queue and irq_work logic will do the necessary
+	 * synchronization for the wake ups. The only thing
+	 * that is necessary is that the wake up happens after
+	 * a task has been queued. It's OK for spurious wake ups.
+	 */
+	if (full)
+		work->full_waiters_pending = true;
+	else
+		work->waiters_pending = true;
 
-		/*
-		 * The events can happen in critical sections where
-		 * checking a work queue can cause deadlocks.
-		 * After adding a task to the queue, this flag is set
-		 * only to notify events to try to wake up the queue
-		 * using irq_work.
-		 *
-		 * We don't clear it even if the buffer is no longer
-		 * empty. The flag only causes the next event to run
-		 * irq_work to do the work queue wake up. The worse
-		 * that can happen if we race with !trace_empty() is that
-		 * an event will cause an irq_work to try to wake up
-		 * an empty queue.
-		 *
-		 * There's no reason to protect this flag either, as
-		 * the work queue and irq_work logic will do the necessary
-		 * synchronization for the wake ups. The only thing
-		 * that is necessary is that the wake up happens after
-		 * a task has been queued. It's OK for spurious wake ups.
-		 */
-		if (full)
-			work->full_waiters_pending = true;
-		else
-			work->waiters_pending = true;
+	if (rb_watermark_hit(buffer, cpu, full))
+		goto out;
 
-		if (signal_pending(current)) {
-			ret = -EINTR;
-			break;
-		}
-
-		if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS && !ring_buffer_empty(buffer))
-			break;
-
-		if (cpu != RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS &&
-		    !ring_buffer_empty_cpu(buffer, cpu)) {
-			unsigned long flags;
-			bool pagebusy;
-			bool done;
-
-			if (!full)
-				break;
-
-			raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
-			pagebusy = cpu_buffer->reader_page == cpu_buffer->commit_page;
-			done = !pagebusy && full_hit(buffer, cpu, full);
-
-			if (!cpu_buffer->shortest_full ||
-			    cpu_buffer->shortest_full > full)
-				cpu_buffer->shortest_full = full;
-			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
-			if (done)
-				break;
-		}
-
-		schedule();
-
-		/* Make sure to see the new wait index */
-		smp_rmb();
-		if (wait_index != work->wait_index)
-			break;
+	if (signal_pending(current)) {
+		ret = -EINTR;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
+	schedule();
+ out:
 	if (full)
 		finish_wait(&work->full_waiters, &wait);
 	else
 		finish_wait(&work->waiters, &wait);
 
+	if (!ret && !rb_watermark_hit(buffer, cpu, full) && signal_pending(current))
+		ret = -EINTR;
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -937,28 +945,33 @@ __poll_t ring_buffer_poll_wait(struct trace_buffer *buffer, int cpu,
 			  struct file *filp, poll_table *poll_table, int full)
 {
 	struct ring_buffer_per_cpu *cpu_buffer;
-	struct rb_irq_work *work;
+	struct rb_irq_work *rbwork;
 
 	if (cpu == RING_BUFFER_ALL_CPUS) {
-		work = &buffer->irq_work;
+		rbwork = &buffer->irq_work;
 		full = 0;
 	} else {
 		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, buffer->cpumask))
 			return EPOLLERR;
 
 		cpu_buffer = buffer->buffers[cpu];
-		work = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
+		rbwork = &cpu_buffer->irq_work;
 	}
 
 	if (full) {
-		poll_wait(filp, &work->full_waiters, poll_table);
-		work->full_waiters_pending = true;
+		unsigned long flags;
+
+		poll_wait(filp, &rbwork->full_waiters, poll_table);
+
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
+		rbwork->full_waiters_pending = true;
 		if (!cpu_buffer->shortest_full ||
 		    cpu_buffer->shortest_full > full)
 			cpu_buffer->shortest_full = full;
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpu_buffer->reader_lock, flags);
 	} else {
-		poll_wait(filp, &work->waiters, poll_table);
-		work->waiters_pending = true;
+		poll_wait(filp, &rbwork->waiters, poll_table);
+		rbwork->waiters_pending = true;
 	}
 
 	/*

kernel/trace/trace.c

@@ -7293,6 +7293,8 @@ tracing_free_buffer_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#define TRACE_MARKER_MAX_SIZE		4096
+
 static ssize_t
 tracing_mark_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 					size_t cnt, loff_t *fpos)
@@ -7320,6 +7322,9 @@ tracing_mark_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 	if ((ssize_t)cnt < 0)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	if (cnt > TRACE_MARKER_MAX_SIZE)
+		cnt = TRACE_MARKER_MAX_SIZE;
+
 	meta_size = sizeof(*entry) + 2;  /* add '\0' and possible '\n' */
  again:
 	size = cnt + meta_size;
@@ -7328,11 +7333,6 @@ tracing_mark_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *ubuf,
 	if (cnt < FAULTED_SIZE)
 		size += FAULTED_SIZE - cnt;
 
-	if (size > TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE) {
-		cnt -= size - TRACE_SEQ_BUFFER_SIZE;
-		goto again;
-	}
-
 	buffer = tr->array_buffer.buffer;
 	event = __trace_buffer_lock_reserve(buffer, TRACE_PRINT, size,
 					    tracing_gen_ctx());
@@ -8393,6 +8393,20 @@ tracing_buffers_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ubuf,
 	return size;
 }
 
+static int tracing_buffers_flush(struct file *file, fl_owner_t id)
+{
+	struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = file->private_data;
+	struct trace_iterator *iter = &info->iter;
+
+	iter->wait_index++;
+	/* Make sure the waiters see the new wait_index */
+	smp_wmb();
+
+	ring_buffer_wake_waiters(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int tracing_buffers_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
 	struct ftrace_buffer_info *info = file->private_data;
@@ -8404,12 +8418,6 @@ static int tracing_buffers_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 
 	__trace_array_put(iter->tr);
 
-	iter->wait_index++;
-	/* Make sure the waiters see the new wait_index */
-	smp_wmb();
-
-	ring_buffer_wake_waiters(iter->array_buffer->buffer, iter->cpu_file);
-
 	if (info->spare)
 		ring_buffer_free_read_page(iter->array_buffer->buffer,
 					   info->spare_cpu, info->spare);
@@ -8625,6 +8633,7 @@ static const struct file_operations tracing_buffers_fops = {
 	.read		= tracing_buffers_read,
 	.poll		= tracing_buffers_poll,
 	.release	= tracing_buffers_release,
+	.flush		= tracing_buffers_flush,
 	.splice_read	= tracing_buffers_splice_read,
 	.unlocked_ioctl = tracing_buffers_ioctl,
 	.llseek		= no_llseek,

kernel/trace/trace_output.c

@@ -1587,12 +1587,11 @@ static enum print_line_t trace_print_print(struct trace_iterator *iter,
 {
 	struct print_entry *field;
 	struct trace_seq *s = &iter->seq;
-	int max = iter->ent_size - offsetof(struct print_entry, buf);
 
 	trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
 
 	seq_print_ip_sym(s, field->ip, flags);
-	trace_seq_printf(s, ": %.*s", max, field->buf);
+	trace_seq_printf(s, ": %s", field->buf);
 
 	return trace_handle_return(s);
 }
@@ -1601,11 +1600,10 @@ static enum print_line_t trace_print_raw(struct trace_iterator *iter, int flags,
 					 struct trace_event *event)
 {
 	struct print_entry *field;
-	int max = iter->ent_size - offsetof(struct print_entry, buf);
 
 	trace_assign_type(field, iter->ent);
 
-	trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "# %lx %.*s", field->ip, max, field->buf);
+	trace_seq_printf(&iter->seq, "# %lx %s", field->ip, field->buf);
 
 	return trace_handle_return(&iter->seq);
 }