bpf, x64: Remove tail call detection
As 'prog->aux->tail_call_reachable' is correct for tail call present, it's unnecessary to detect tail call in x86 jit. Therefore, let's remove it. Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <hffilwlqm@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610124224.34673-3-hffilwlqm@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
01793ed86b
commit
f663a03c8e
@ -1234,13 +1234,11 @@ bool ex_handler_bpf(const struct exception_table_entry *x, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void detect_reg_usage(struct bpf_insn *insn, int insn_cnt,
|
||||
bool *regs_used, bool *tail_call_seen)
|
||||
bool *regs_used)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 1; i <= insn_cnt; i++, insn++) {
|
||||
if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL))
|
||||
*tail_call_seen = true;
|
||||
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_6 || insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_6)
|
||||
regs_used[0] = true;
|
||||
if (insn->dst_reg == BPF_REG_7 || insn->src_reg == BPF_REG_7)
|
||||
@ -1324,7 +1322,6 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
|
||||
struct bpf_insn *insn = bpf_prog->insnsi;
|
||||
bool callee_regs_used[4] = {};
|
||||
int insn_cnt = bpf_prog->len;
|
||||
bool tail_call_seen = false;
|
||||
bool seen_exit = false;
|
||||
u8 temp[BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE + BPF_INSN_SAFETY];
|
||||
u64 arena_vm_start, user_vm_start;
|
||||
@ -1336,11 +1333,7 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
|
||||
arena_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_kern_vm_start(bpf_prog->aux->arena);
|
||||
user_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_user_vm_start(bpf_prog->aux->arena);
|
||||
|
||||
detect_reg_usage(insn, insn_cnt, callee_regs_used,
|
||||
&tail_call_seen);
|
||||
|
||||
/* tail call's presence in current prog implies it is reachable */
|
||||
tail_call_reachable |= tail_call_seen;
|
||||
detect_reg_usage(insn, insn_cnt, callee_regs_used);
|
||||
|
||||
emit_prologue(&prog, bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth,
|
||||
bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog), tail_call_reachable,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user