mm: memcg: add cacheline padding after lruvec in mem_cgroup_per_node
Oliver Sand reported a performance regression caused by commit98c9daf5ae
("mm: memcg: guard memcg1-specific members of struct mem_cgroup_per_node"), which puts some fields of the mem_cgroup_per_node structure under the CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 config option. Apparently it causes a false cache sharing between lruvec and lru_zone_size members of the structure. Fix it by adding an explicit padding after the lruvec member. Even though the padding is not required with CONFIG_MEMCG_V1 set, it seems like the introduced memory overhead is not significant enough to warrant another divergence in the mem_cgroup_per_node layout, so the padding is added unconditionally. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240723171244.747521-1-roman.gushchin@linux.dev Fixes:98c9daf5ae
("mm: memcg: guard memcg1-specific members of struct mem_cgroup_per_node") Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202407121335.31a10cb6-oliver.sang@intel.com Tested-by: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com> Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b3bebe4430
commit
f59adcf593
@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
|
||||
|
||||
/* Fields which get updated often at the end. */
|
||||
struct lruvec lruvec;
|
||||
CACHELINE_PADDING(_pad2_);
|
||||
unsigned long lru_zone_size[MAX_NR_ZONES][NR_LRU_LISTS];
|
||||
struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter iter;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user