jffs2: Allow setting rp_size to zero during remounting
Set rp_size to zero will be ignore during remounting. The method to identify whether we input a remounting option of rp_size is to check if the rp_size input is zero. It can not work well if we pass "rp_size=0". This patch add a bool variable "set_rp_size" to fix this problem. Reported-by: Jubin Zhong <zhongjubin@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: lizhe <lizhe67@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
This commit is contained in:
parent
08cd274f9b
commit
cd3ed3c73a
@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct jffs2_mount_opts {
|
||||
* users. This is implemented simply by means of not allowing the
|
||||
* latter users to write to the file system if the amount if the
|
||||
* available space is less then 'rp_size'. */
|
||||
bool set_rp_size;
|
||||
unsigned int rp_size;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int jffs2_show_options(struct seq_file *s, struct dentry *root)
|
||||
|
||||
if (opts->override_compr)
|
||||
seq_printf(s, ",compr=%s", jffs2_compr_name(opts->compr));
|
||||
if (opts->rp_size)
|
||||
if (opts->set_rp_size)
|
||||
seq_printf(s, ",rp_size=%u", opts->rp_size / 1024);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ static int jffs2_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
|
||||
if (opt > c->mtd->size)
|
||||
return invalf(fc, "jffs2: Too large reserve pool specified, max is %llu KB",
|
||||
c->mtd->size / 1024);
|
||||
c->mount_opts.set_rp_size = true;
|
||||
c->mount_opts.rp_size = opt;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
@ -225,8 +226,10 @@ static inline void jffs2_update_mount_opts(struct fs_context *fc)
|
||||
c->mount_opts.override_compr = new_c->mount_opts.override_compr;
|
||||
c->mount_opts.compr = new_c->mount_opts.compr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (new_c->mount_opts.rp_size)
|
||||
if (new_c->mount_opts.set_rp_size) {
|
||||
c->mount_opts.set_rp_size = new_c->mount_opts.set_rp_size;
|
||||
c->mount_opts.rp_size = new_c->mount_opts.rp_size;
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&c->alloc_sem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user