mm: swap: reuse exclusive folio directly instead of wp page faults
After swapping out, we perform a swap-in operation. If we first read and then write, we encounter a major fault in do_swap_page for reading, along with additional minor faults in do_wp_page for writing. However, the latter appears to be unnecessary and inefficient. Instead, we can directly reuse in do_swap_page and completely eliminate the need for do_wp_page. This patch achieves that optimization specifically for exclusive folios. The following microbenchmark demonstrates the significant reduction in minor faults. #define DATA_SIZE (2UL * 1024 * 1024) #define PAGE_SIZE (4UL * 1024) static void *read_write_data(char *addr) { char tmp; for (int i = 0; i < DATA_SIZE; i += PAGE_SIZE) { tmp = *(volatile char *)(addr + i); *(volatile char *)(addr + i) = tmp; } } int main(int argc, char **argv) { struct rusage ru; char *addr = mmap(NULL, DATA_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0); memset(addr, 0x11, DATA_SIZE); do { long old_ru_minflt, old_ru_majflt; long new_ru_minflt, new_ru_majflt; madvise(addr, DATA_SIZE, MADV_PAGEOUT); getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, &ru); old_ru_minflt = ru.ru_minflt; old_ru_majflt = ru.ru_majflt; read_write_data(addr); getrusage(RUSAGE_SELF, &ru); new_ru_minflt = ru.ru_minflt; new_ru_majflt = ru.ru_majflt; printf("minor faults:%ld major faults:%ld\n", new_ru_minflt - old_ru_minflt, new_ru_majflt - old_ru_majflt); } while(0); return 0; } w/o patch, / # ~/a.out minor faults:512 major faults:512 w/ patch, / # ~/a.out minor faults:0 major faults:512 Minor faults decrease to 0! Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240602004502.26895-1-21cnbao@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7b09fa7ea4
commit
c18160dba5
18
mm/memory.c
18
mm/memory.c
@ -4310,6 +4310,10 @@ check_folio:
|
||||
add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES, nr_pages);
|
||||
add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_SWAPENTS, -nr_pages);
|
||||
pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
|
||||
if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(vmf->orig_pte))
|
||||
pte = pte_mksoft_dirty(pte);
|
||||
if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(vmf->orig_pte))
|
||||
pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Same logic as in do_wp_page(); however, optimize for pages that are
|
||||
@ -4319,18 +4323,18 @@ check_folio:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!folio_test_ksm(folio) &&
|
||||
(exclusive || folio_ref_count(folio) == 1)) {
|
||||
if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
|
||||
pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
|
||||
vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
|
||||
if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) && !userfaultfd_pte_wp(vma, pte) &&
|
||||
!vma_soft_dirty_enabled(vma)) {
|
||||
pte = pte_mkwrite(pte, vma);
|
||||
if (vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) {
|
||||
pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
|
||||
vmf->flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
rmap_flags |= RMAP_EXCLUSIVE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
folio_ref_add(folio, nr_pages - 1);
|
||||
flush_icache_pages(vma, page, nr_pages);
|
||||
if (pte_swp_soft_dirty(vmf->orig_pte))
|
||||
pte = pte_mksoft_dirty(pte);
|
||||
if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(vmf->orig_pte))
|
||||
pte = pte_mkuffd_wp(pte);
|
||||
vmf->orig_pte = pte_advance_pfn(pte, page_idx);
|
||||
|
||||
/* ksm created a completely new copy */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user