1

perf script: Minimize "not reaching sample" for '-F +brstackinsn'

In some situations 'perf script -F +brstackinsn' sees a lot of "not
reaching sample" messages.

This happens when the last LBR block before the sample contains a branch
that is not in the LBR, and the instruction dumping stops.

  $ perf record -b  emacs -Q --batch '()'
  [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
  [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.396 MB perf.data (443 samples) ]
  $ perf script -F +brstackinsn
  ...
          00007f0ab2d171a4        insn: 41 0f 94 c0
          00007f0ab2d171a8        insn: 83 fa 01
          00007f0ab2d171ab        insn: 74 d3                     # PRED 6 cycles [313] 1.00 IPC
          00007f0ab2d17180        insn: 45 84 c0
          00007f0ab2d17183        insn: 74 28
          ... not reaching sample ...

  $ perf script -F +brstackinsn | grep -c reach
  136
  $

This is a problem for further analysis that wants to see the full code
upto the sample.

There are two common cases where the message is bogus:

- The LBR only logs taken branches, but the branch might be a
  conditional branch that is not taken (that is the most common case
  actually)

- The LBR sampling uses a filter ignoring some branches, but the perf
  script check checks for all branches.

This patch fixes these two conditions, by only checking for conditional
branches, as well as checking the perf_event_attr's branch filter
attributes.

For the test case above it fixes all the messages:

  $ ./perf script -F +brstackinsn | grep -c reach
  0

Note that there are still conditions when the message is hit --
sometimes there can be a unconditional branch that misses the LBR update
before the sample -- but they are much more rare now.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229161828.386397-1-ak@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andi Kleen 2024-02-29 08:18:28 -08:00 committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
parent 8b3b1bb3ea
commit bf0db8c759
4 changed files with 9 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
* Due to pipeline delays the LBRs might be missing a branch * Due to pipeline delays the LBRs might be missing a branch
* or two, which can result in very large or negative blocks * or two, which can result in very large or negative blocks
* between final branch and sample. When this happens just * between final branch and sample. When this happens just
* continue walking after the last TO until we hit a branch. * continue walking after the last TO.
*/ */
start = entries[0].to; start = entries[0].to;
end = sample->ip; end = sample->ip;
@ -1463,7 +1463,9 @@ static int perf_sample__fprintf_brstackinsn(struct perf_sample *sample,
printed += fprintf(fp, "\n"); printed += fprintf(fp, "\n");
if (ilen == 0) if (ilen == 0)
break; break;
if (arch_is_branch(buffer + off, len - off, x.is64bit) && start + off != sample->ip) { if ((attr->branch_sample_type == 0 || attr->branch_sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY)
&& arch_is_uncond_branch(buffer + off, len - off, x.is64bit)
&& start + off != sample->ip) {
/* /*
* Hit a missing branch. Just stop. * Hit a missing branch. Just stop.
*/ */

View File

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ const char *dump_insn(struct perf_insn *x __maybe_unused,
} }
__weak __weak
int arch_is_branch(const unsigned char *buf __maybe_unused, int arch_is_uncond_branch(const unsigned char *buf __maybe_unused,
size_t len __maybe_unused, size_t len __maybe_unused,
int x86_64 __maybe_unused) int x86_64 __maybe_unused)
{ {

View File

@ -21,6 +21,6 @@ struct perf_insn {
const char *dump_insn(struct perf_insn *x, u64 ip, const char *dump_insn(struct perf_insn *x, u64 ip,
u8 *inbuf, int inlen, int *lenp); u8 *inbuf, int inlen, int *lenp);
int arch_is_branch(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len, int x86_64); int arch_is_uncond_branch(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len, int x86_64);
#endif #endif

View File

@ -209,12 +209,13 @@ int intel_pt_get_insn(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len, int x86_64,
return 0; return 0;
} }
int arch_is_branch(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len, int x86_64) int arch_is_uncond_branch(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len, int x86_64)
{ {
struct intel_pt_insn in; struct intel_pt_insn in;
if (intel_pt_get_insn(buf, len, x86_64, &in) < 0) if (intel_pt_get_insn(buf, len, x86_64, &in) < 0)
return -1; return -1;
return in.branch != INTEL_PT_BR_NO_BRANCH; return in.branch == INTEL_PT_BR_UNCONDITIONAL ||
in.branch == INTEL_PT_BR_INDIRECT;
} }
const char *dump_insn(struct perf_insn *x, uint64_t ip __maybe_unused, const char *dump_insn(struct perf_insn *x, uint64_t ip __maybe_unused,