From b393590992b78e8753173b99da81209f4376dbb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Li Zhijian Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 09:00:28 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: exception-tables.rst: Fix the wrong steps referenced When it was in text format, it correctly hardcoded steps 8a to 8c. However, after it was converted to RST, the sequence numbers were auto-generated during rendering and became incorrect after some steps were inserted. Change it to refer to steps a to c in a relative way. Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian [jc: Indented the line to make the relative reference more clear] Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240614010028.48262-1-lizhijian@fujitsu.com --- Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst index efde1fef4fbd..6e7177363f8f 100644 --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/exception-tables.rst @@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ vma occurs? c) execution continues at local label 2 (address of the instruction immediately after the faulting user access). -The steps 8a to 8c in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction. + The steps a to c above in a certain way emulate the faulting instruction. That's it, mostly. If you look at our example, you might ask why we set EAX to -EFAULT in the exception handler code. Well, the