remoteproc: k3-r5: Fix IPC-only mode detection
ret variable was used to test reset status, get from
reset_control_status() call. But this variable was overwritten by
ti_sci_proc_get_status() a few lines bellow.
And as ti_sci_proc_get_status() returns 0 or a negative value (in this
latter case, followed by a return), the expression !ret was always true,
Clearly, this was not what was intended:
In the comment above it's said that "requires both local and module
resets to be deasserted"; if reset_control_status() returns 0 it means
that the reset line is deasserted.
So, it's pretty clear that the return value of reset_control_status()
was intended to be used instead of ti_sci_proc_get_status() return
value.
This could lead in an incorrect IPC-only mode detection if reset line is
asserted (so reset_control_status() return > 0) and c_state != 0 and
halted == 0.
In this case, the old code would have detected an IPC-only mode instead
of a mismatched mode.
Fixes: 1168af40b1
("remoteproc: k3-r5: Add support for IPC-only mode for all R5Fs")
Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Hari Nagalla <hnagalla@ti.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240621150058.319524-2-richard.genoud@bootlin.com
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
67ca3f9807
commit
a8631f6d63
@ -1144,6 +1144,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
|
|||||||
u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama;
|
u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama;
|
||||||
struct k3_r5_core *core0;
|
struct k3_r5_core *core0;
|
||||||
enum cluster_mode mode = cluster->mode;
|
enum cluster_mode mode = cluster->mode;
|
||||||
|
int reset_ctrl_status;
|
||||||
int ret;
|
int ret;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
|
core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem);
|
||||||
@ -1160,11 +1161,11 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
|
|||||||
r_state, c_state);
|
r_state, c_state);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ret = reset_control_status(core->reset);
|
reset_ctrl_status = reset_control_status(core->reset);
|
||||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
if (reset_ctrl_status < 0) {
|
||||||
dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n",
|
dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n",
|
||||||
ret);
|
reset_ctrl_status);
|
||||||
return ret;
|
return reset_ctrl_status;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
@ -1199,7 +1200,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
|
|||||||
* irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset
|
* irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset
|
||||||
* deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode
|
* deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (c_state && !ret && !halted) {
|
if (c_state && !reset_ctrl_status && !halted) {
|
||||||
dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n");
|
dev_info(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n");
|
||||||
kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
|
kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED;
|
||||||
ret = 1;
|
ret = 1;
|
||||||
@ -1217,7 +1218,7 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
|
|||||||
ret = 0;
|
ret = 0;
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else {
|
||||||
dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n",
|
dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n",
|
||||||
!ret ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
|
!reset_ctrl_status ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
|
||||||
c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
|
c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted",
|
||||||
halted ? "halted" : "unhalted");
|
halted ? "halted" : "unhalted");
|
||||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user