kevin/linux
1
Fork 0
Code

io-wq: use IO_WQ_ACCT_NR rather than hardcoded number

Browse Source 
It's better to use the defined enum stuff not the hardcoded number to
define array.

Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220206095241.121485-4-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Hao Xu 2022-02-06 17:52:41 +08:00 committed by Jens Axboe
parent e13fb1fe14
commit 86127bb18a
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
fs/io-wq.c
View File

@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ enum {
*/
struct io_wqe {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
struct io_wqe_acct acct[2];
struct io_wqe_acct acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_NR];
int node;
@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ int io_wq_max_workers(struct io_wq *wq, int *new_count)
BUILD_BUG_ON((int) IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND != (int) IO_WQ_UNBOUND);
BUILD_BUG_ON((int) IO_WQ_ACCT_NR != 2);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
for (i = 0; i < IO_WQ_ACCT_NR; i++) {
if (new_count[i] > task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC))
new_count[i] = task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
}