From 6f28c4a852fab8bd759a383149dfd30511477249 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 16:54:54 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] cpuidle: Avoid explicit cpumask allocation on stack In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of stack space and make stack overflows more likely. Use cpumask_first_and_and() and cpumask_weight_and() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on the stack. Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240416085454.3547175-8-dawei.li@shingroup.cn --- drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c | 13 +++---------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c b/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c index 9acde71558d5..bb8761c8a42e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c @@ -439,13 +439,8 @@ static int cpuidle_coupled_clear_pokes(int cpu) static bool cpuidle_coupled_any_pokes_pending(struct cpuidle_coupled *coupled) { - cpumask_t cpus; - int ret; - - cpumask_and(&cpus, cpu_online_mask, &coupled->coupled_cpus); - ret = cpumask_and(&cpus, &cpuidle_coupled_poke_pending, &cpus); - - return ret; + return cpumask_first_and_and(cpu_online_mask, &coupled->coupled_cpus, + &cpuidle_coupled_poke_pending) < nr_cpu_ids; } /** @@ -626,9 +621,7 @@ out: static void cpuidle_coupled_update_online_cpus(struct cpuidle_coupled *coupled) { - cpumask_t cpus; - cpumask_and(&cpus, cpu_online_mask, &coupled->coupled_cpus); - coupled->online_count = cpumask_weight(&cpus); + coupled->online_count = cpumask_weight_and(cpu_online_mask, &coupled->coupled_cpus); } /**