kevin/linux
1
Fork 0
Code

proc: Fix typo in the comment

Browse Source 
The deference here confuses me.

Maybe here want to say that because show_fd_locks() does not dereference
the files pointer, using the stale value of the files pointer is safe.

Correctly spelled comments make it easier for the reader to understand
the code.

replace 'deferences' with 'dereferences' in the comment &
replace 'inialized' with 'initialized' in the comment.

Signed-off-by: Yan Zhen <yanzhen@vivo.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240909063353.2246419-1-yanzhen@vivo.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Yan Zhen 2024-09-09 14:33:53 +08:00 committed by Christian Brauner
parent 33d8525dc1
commit 698e7d1680
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 91C61BC06578DCA2
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
fs/proc/fd.c
View File

@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static int seq_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
real_mount(file->f_path.mnt)->mnt_id,
file_inode(file)->i_ino);
/* show_fd_locks() never deferences files so a stale value is safe */
/* show_fd_locks() never dereferences files, so a stale value is safe */
show_fd_locks(m, file, files);
if (seq_has_overflowed(m))
goto out;

2
fs/proc/kcore.c
View File

@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int kcore_ram_list(struct list_head *list)
int nid, ret;
unsigned long end_pfn;
/* Not inialized....update now */
/* Not initialized....update now */
/* find out "max pfn" */
end_pfn = 0;
for_each_node_state(nid, N_MEMORY) {