nilfs2: handle inconsistent state in nilfs_btnode_create_block()
Syzbot reported that a buffer state inconsistency was detected in
nilfs_btnode_create_block(), triggering a kernel bug.
It is not appropriate to treat this inconsistency as a bug; it can occur
if the argument block address (the buffer index of the newly created
block) is a virtual block number and has been reallocated due to
corruption of the bitmap used to manage its allocation state.
So, modify nilfs_btnode_create_block() and its callers to treat it as a
possible filesystem error, rather than triggering a kernel bug.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240725052007.4562-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Fixes: a60be987d4
("nilfs2: B-tree node cache")
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+89cc4f2324ed37988b60@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=89cc4f2324ed37988b60
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f556acc2fa
commit
4811f7af60
@ -51,12 +51,21 @@ nilfs_btnode_create_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr)
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
bh = nilfs_grab_buffer(inode, btnc, blocknr, BIT(BH_NILFS_Node));
|
bh = nilfs_grab_buffer(inode, btnc, blocknr, BIT(BH_NILFS_Node));
|
||||||
if (unlikely(!bh))
|
if (unlikely(!bh))
|
||||||
return NULL;
|
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (unlikely(buffer_mapped(bh) || buffer_uptodate(bh) ||
|
if (unlikely(buffer_mapped(bh) || buffer_uptodate(bh) ||
|
||||||
buffer_dirty(bh))) {
|
buffer_dirty(bh))) {
|
||||||
brelse(bh);
|
/*
|
||||||
BUG();
|
* The block buffer at the specified new address was already
|
||||||
|
* in use. This can happen if it is a virtual block number
|
||||||
|
* and has been reallocated due to corruption of the bitmap
|
||||||
|
* used to manage its allocation state (if not, the buffer
|
||||||
|
* clearing of an abandoned b-tree node is missing somewhere).
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
nilfs_error(inode->i_sb,
|
||||||
|
"state inconsistency probably due to duplicate use of b-tree node block address %llu (ino=%lu)",
|
||||||
|
(unsigned long long)blocknr, inode->i_ino);
|
||||||
|
goto failed;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
memset(bh->b_data, 0, i_blocksize(inode));
|
memset(bh->b_data, 0, i_blocksize(inode));
|
||||||
bh->b_bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
|
bh->b_bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
|
||||||
@ -67,6 +76,12 @@ nilfs_btnode_create_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr)
|
|||||||
folio_unlock(bh->b_folio);
|
folio_unlock(bh->b_folio);
|
||||||
folio_put(bh->b_folio);
|
folio_put(bh->b_folio);
|
||||||
return bh;
|
return bh;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
failed:
|
||||||
|
folio_unlock(bh->b_folio);
|
||||||
|
folio_put(bh->b_folio);
|
||||||
|
brelse(bh);
|
||||||
|
return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
int nilfs_btnode_submit_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr,
|
int nilfs_btnode_submit_block(struct address_space *btnc, __u64 blocknr,
|
||||||
@ -217,8 +232,8 @@ retry:
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
nbh = nilfs_btnode_create_block(btnc, newkey);
|
nbh = nilfs_btnode_create_block(btnc, newkey);
|
||||||
if (!nbh)
|
if (IS_ERR(nbh))
|
||||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
return PTR_ERR(nbh);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
BUG_ON(nbh == obh);
|
BUG_ON(nbh == obh);
|
||||||
ctxt->newbh = nbh;
|
ctxt->newbh = nbh;
|
||||||
|
@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ static int nilfs_btree_get_new_block(const struct nilfs_bmap *btree,
|
|||||||
struct buffer_head *bh;
|
struct buffer_head *bh;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
bh = nilfs_btnode_create_block(btnc, ptr);
|
bh = nilfs_btnode_create_block(btnc, ptr);
|
||||||
if (!bh)
|
if (IS_ERR(bh))
|
||||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
return PTR_ERR(bh);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
set_buffer_nilfs_volatile(bh);
|
set_buffer_nilfs_volatile(bh);
|
||||||
*bhp = bh;
|
*bhp = bh;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user