kevin/linux
1
Fork 0
Code

btrfs: fix mismatching parameter names for btrfs_get_extent()

Browse Source 
The definition for btrfs_get_extent() is using "u64 end" as the last
parameter, but in implementation we go "u64 len", and all call sites
follows the implementation.

This can be very confusing during development, as most developers
including me, would just use the snippet returned by LSP (clangd in my
case), which would only check the definition.

Unfortunately this mismatch is introduced from the very beginning of
btrfs.

Fix it to prevent further confusion.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
Qu Wenruo 2023-12-05 18:21:29 +10:30 committed by David Sterba
parent f86f7a75e2
commit 4618d0a66b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
View File

@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ struct inode *btrfs_iget_path(struct super_block *s, u64 ino,
struct inode *btrfs_iget(struct super_block *s, u64 ino, struct btrfs_root *root);
struct extent_map *btrfs_get_extent(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
struct page *page, size_t pg_offset,
u64 start, u64 end);
u64 start, u64 len);
int btrfs_update_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
struct btrfs_inode *inode);
int btrfs_update_inode_fallback(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,