1

mm: remove duplicated open-coded VMA policy check

Both can_vma_merge_before() and can_vma_merge_after() are invoked after
checking for compatible VMA NUMA policy, we can simply move this to
is_mergeable_vma() and abstract this altogether.

In mmap_region() we set vmg->policy to NULL, so the policy comparisons
checked in can_vma_merge_before() and can_vma_merge_after() are exactly
equivalent to !vma_policy(vmg.next) and !vma_policy(vmg.prev).

Equally, in do_brk_flags(), vmg->policy is NULL, so the
can_vma_merge_after() is checking !vma_policy(vma), as we set vmg.prev to
vma.

In vma_merge(), we compare prev and next policies with vmg->policy before
checking can_vma_merge_after() and can_vma_merge_before() respectively,
which this patch causes to be checked in precisely the same way.

This therefore maintains precisely the same logic as before, only now
abstracted into is_mergeable_vma().

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0dbff286d9c4988333bc6f4ff3734cb95dd5410a.1725040657.git.lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Bert Karwatzki <spasswolf@web.de>
Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Lorenzo Stoakes 2024-08-30 19:10:16 +01:00 committed by Andrew Morton
parent 2f1c6611b0
commit 3e01310d29
2 changed files with 7 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -1423,8 +1423,7 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
/* Attempt to expand an old mapping */
/* Check next */
if (next && next->vm_start == end && !vma_policy(next) &&
can_vma_merge_before(&vmg)) {
if (next && next->vm_start == end && can_vma_merge_before(&vmg)) {
merge_end = next->vm_end;
vma = next;
vmg.pgoff = next->vm_pgoff - pglen;
@ -1438,8 +1437,7 @@ unsigned long mmap_region(struct file *file, unsigned long addr,
}
/* Check prev */
if (prev && prev->vm_end == addr && !vma_policy(prev) &&
can_vma_merge_after(&vmg)) {
if (prev && prev->vm_end == addr && can_vma_merge_after(&vmg)) {
merge_start = prev->vm_start;
vma = prev;
vmg.pgoff = prev->vm_pgoff;
@ -1779,7 +1777,7 @@ static int do_brk_flags(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
* Expand the existing vma if possible; Note that singular lists do not
* occur after forking, so the expand will only happen on new VMAs.
*/
if (vma && vma->vm_end == addr && !vma_policy(vma)) {
if (vma && vma->vm_end == addr) {
VMG_STATE(vmg, mm, vmi, addr, addr + len, flags, PHYS_PFN(addr));
vmg.prev = vma;

View File

@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ static inline bool is_mergeable_vma(struct vma_merge_struct *vmg, bool merge_nex
*/
bool may_remove_vma = merge_next;
if (!mpol_equal(vmg->policy, vma_policy(vma)))
return false;
/*
* VM_SOFTDIRTY should not prevent from VMA merging, if we
* match the flags but dirty bit -- the caller should mark
@ -1053,17 +1055,14 @@ static struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_merge_struct *vmg)
vma_pgoff = prev->vm_pgoff;
/* Can we merge the predecessor? */
if (addr == prev->vm_end && mpol_equal(vma_policy(prev), vmg->policy)
&& can_vma_merge_after(vmg)) {
if (addr == prev->vm_end && can_vma_merge_after(vmg)) {
merge_prev = true;
vma_prev(vmg->vmi);
}
}
/* Can we merge the successor? */
if (next && mpol_equal(vmg->policy, vma_policy(next)) &&
can_vma_merge_before(vmg)) {
if (next && can_vma_merge_before(vmg)) {
merge_next = true;
}