From 3ccae1dc84086721c300a1026d2c38574e433e69 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 17:18:36 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: assert hugetlb_lock in
 __hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge

This is similar to __hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_folio() where it relies on
holding hugetlb_lock.  Add the similar assertion like the other one, since
it looks like such things may help some day.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240417211836.2742593-4-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
 mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
index aa4486bd3904..e20339a346b9 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void __hugetlb_cgroup_commit_charge(int idx, unsigned long nr_pages,
 {
 	if (hugetlb_cgroup_disabled() || !h_cg)
 		return;
-
+	lockdep_assert_held(&hugetlb_lock);
 	__set_hugetlb_cgroup(folio, h_cg, rsvd);
 	if (!rsvd) {
 		unsigned long usage =