additional ata changes for 6.9-rc1
- A single fix for ASMedia HBAs. These HBAs do not indicate that they support SATA Port Multipliers CAP.SPM (Supports Port Multiplier) is not set. Likewise, they do not allow you to probe the devices behind an attached PMP, as defined according to the SATA-IO PMP specification. Instead, they have decided to implement their own version of PMP, and because of this, plugging in a PMP actually works, even if the HBA claims that it does not support PMP. Revert a recent quirk for these HBAs, as that breaks ASMedia's own implementation of PMP. Unfortunately, this will once again give some users of these HBAs significantly increased boot time. However, a longer boot time for some, is the lesser evil compared to some other users not being able to detect their drives at all. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIgEABYKADAWIQRN+ES/c4tHlMch3DzJZDGjmcZNcgUCZfl1DxIcY2Fzc2VsQGtl cm5lbC5vcmcACgkQyWQxo5nGTXLbfgD/YSHXSMFTch4waFnTVqbI73s8YY7MAf3N Udis3pXUnL4A/24OxmRaWvE3esgura1puHbMUxgQuFSoxqiF+W47iGcJ =JrQQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Merge tag 'ata-6.9-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/libata/linux Pull ata fix from Niklas Cassel: "A single fix for ASMedia HBAs. These HBAs do not indicate that they support SATA Port Multipliers CAP.SPM (Supports Port Multiplier) is not set. Likewise, they do not allow you to probe the devices behind an attached PMP, as defined according to the SATA-IO PMP specification. Instead, they have decided to implement their own version of PMP, and because of this, plugging in a PMP actually works, even if the HBA claims that it does not support PMP. Revert a recent quirk for these HBAs, as that breaks ASMedia's own implementation of PMP. Unfortunately, this will once again give some users of these HBAs significantly increased boot time. However, a longer boot time for some, is the lesser evil compared to some other users not being able to detect their drives at all" * tag 'ata-6.9-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/libata/linux: ahci: asm1064: asm1166: don't limit reported ports
This commit is contained in:
commit
2f3c2b3976
@ -669,19 +669,6 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(mobile_lpm_policy, "Default LPM policy for mobile chipsets");
|
|||||||
static void ahci_pci_save_initial_config(struct pci_dev *pdev,
|
static void ahci_pci_save_initial_config(struct pci_dev *pdev,
|
||||||
struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
|
struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ASMEDIA) {
|
|
||||||
switch (pdev->device) {
|
|
||||||
case 0x1166:
|
|
||||||
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ASM1166 has only six ports\n");
|
|
||||||
hpriv->saved_port_map = 0x3f;
|
|
||||||
break;
|
|
||||||
case 0x1064:
|
|
||||||
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "ASM1064 has only four ports\n");
|
|
||||||
hpriv->saved_port_map = 0xf;
|
|
||||||
break;
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_JMICRON && pdev->device == 0x2361) {
|
if (pdev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_JMICRON && pdev->device == 0x2361) {
|
||||||
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "JMB361 has only one port\n");
|
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "JMB361 has only one port\n");
|
||||||
hpriv->saved_port_map = 1;
|
hpriv->saved_port_map = 1;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user